Connect with us

Camera

DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?

Published

on

DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?


The Air 3 (left) and the Mini 4 Pro (right) were released months apart in 2023. They share many similarities and a few differences. Which one is right for you?

Photo: Kara Murphy

Drones have been accessible to the general public for about a decade and continue to grow in popularity. They’ve become a valuable tool for videographers and photographers alike, providing unique vantage points that otherwise would have required renting a helicopter. With Skydio and Autel recently announcing a departure from the consumer drone market, DJI has emerged as the leader in this particular niche.


Buy the DJI Mini 4 Pro:



Buy the DJI Air 3:


DJI’s Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are ushering in a new era of safer, more reliable flying. Both models offer 360º omnidirectional obstacle detection, superior connectivity between the remote and drone with DJI’s OcuSync 4 (O4) transmission technology, and a variety of automated features that make capturing polished and professional-looking imagery feasible – all at a relatively affordable price.

The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro have updated gimbal clamps that protect the wide-angle fisheye cameras on the front of their bodies.

Photo: Kara Murphy

These drones have a lot in common, but they each have specific features that make them more suitable for certain people, depending on budget. We’ll explore what the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro offer and see which is the best option for most drone pilots. Is it worth investing in one of these newer models? Let’s find out.

By the numbers: DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro

The Air 3 is larger, heavier, and costs more than the sub-250g Mini 4 Pro. [A sub-250g does not need to be registered with the FAA in the US or with analogous agencies in many other countries, as long as it’s being used for recreational purposes.] This will make any Mini or sub-250g drone more appealing for some folks as Remote ID becomes effective in March 2024.

Weighing 720g, the Air 3 is heavier and will fare much better in high winds and other elements than the lightweight Mini 4 Pro. If you are in urban areas where wind tunnels form between buildings or if you fly your drone along the coast near large bodies of water, a lightweight drone is not your best option. And, yes, due to its weight, you’ll need to register it to comply with Remote ID.

DJI Air 3 Mini 4 Pro
Price $1,099 with RC-N2

$1,349 Fly More Combo with RC-N2

$1,549 Fly More Combo with RC 2

$759 with RC-N2

$959 with RC 2

$1,099 Fly More Combo with RC 2

$1,159 Fly More Combo Plus with RC 2

Camera Dual-camera system

Type 1/1.3 sensor

12MP (AEB 3/5/7) or 48MP (AEB 3/5)

F2.8 (fixed), 70mm, F1.7 (fixed)

Type 1/1.3 sensor, F1.7 (fixed)

12MP (AEB 5/7, 2X zoom)

48MP (AEB 3)

Digital Zoom Wide-Angle Camera: 1-3x
Medium Tele Camera: 3-9x

4K/60p

1-3x, up to 4K/60p
4x, up to 1080p/60p
Max Video Resolution 4K/60p, 150 Mbps 4K/60p, 150 Mbps
Video Transmission OcuSync 4.0 (O4), 20 km OcuSync 4.0 (O4), 20 km
Log Video 10-bit D-Log M 10-bit D-Log M
Intelligent Flight Features Waypoints

Cruise Control

FocusTrack

MasterShots

QuickShots

Waypoints

Cruise Control

FocusTrack,

ActiveTrack 360º

MasterShots

QuickShots

Obstacle Detection and Avoidance Omnidirectional, 360º Omnidirectional, 360º
Flight Time 46 minutes 34 minutes/45 minutes*
Dimensions 207×100.5×91.1 mm (8.15×3.96×3.59 in) 148×94×64 mm (5.83×3.7×2.52 in)
Weight 720g 249g
Vertical Shooting 2.7K/60p True Vertical, 4K/60p

*45-minute flight time requires a heavier battery, increasing the Mini 4 Pro’s weight to >250g.

The Mini 4 Pro is the first DJI drone to offer ActiveTrack 360º, which allows you to follow a subject from any angle, in any direction, including the front. The Air 3 will not allow you to track a car or person from the front.

The Mini 4 Pro also allows for True Vertical Shooting, meaning the camera’s entire sensor is used without cropping in any FocusTrack mode or while recording video at up to 4K/60p. This also applies to still images. Vertical shooting is available on the Air 3, but only at a maximum resolution of 2.7K/30p as of this writing. Since this camera does not rotate, the image is cropped.

DJI Air 3 vs Mini 4 Pro: Battery life and runtime

DJI made the front legs of the Mini 4 Pro longer. This makes launching and landing much easier than the Mini 3 Pro.

Photo: Kara Murphy

The Air 3 has brand-new, larger-capacity batteries that snap into the back of the drone. At up to 46 minutes of battery life, the Air 3 has the same flight time as the much more expensive Mavic 3 series.

If you use a standard Intelligent Flight battery on the Mini 4 Pro, you’ll get up to 34 minutes of flight time. The Intelligent Flight Plus batteries give you up to 45 minutes. However, using the bigger Plus battery will place the Mini 4 Pro’s weight above 250g, and you’ll need to register it before flying.

Both the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro have charging consoles that secure the batteries when charging. Because you can’t see how much a Mini battery is charged, the console will display the remaining amount of power for each one. As a bonus, the Air 3’s console is designed to allocate all the power from the other two batteries to one so you can take a full flight.

DJI Air 3 vs Mini 4 Pro: Remote compatibility

The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are compatible with the RC-N2 and RC 2 remote controllers. These are your only remote options since there’s no backward compatibility with older models. Both remotes have DJI’s O4 technology, which gives the drones a 20-kilometer (12.4-mile) range. While you never would fly that far beyond visual line of sight, this robust transmission can help deliver uninterrupted connectivity and a 1080p/60p low-latency stream to your remote’s screen.

DJI’s RC 2 remote looks similar to the original DJI RC. The difference is the antennas included for superior transmission between the drone and its remote.

Photo: Kara Murphy

DJI Air 3 vs Mini 4 Pro: Cameras

The Air 3 is the first in its series to offer a dual-camera system and support native vertical (9:16) shooting. The bottom main camera has a 24mm equiv. fixed F1.7 wide-angle lens and 82º FOV. On top is a 70mm medium telephoto camera (giving you the equivalent of 3X optical zoom from the main camera) with a fixed F2.8 aperture with a 35º FOV. Both cameras use Type 1/1.3 CMOS sensors that support 12MP pixel-binned and 48MP full-resolution photos.

The Mini 4 Pro has a single camera with the same Type 1/1.3 CMOS sensor, 24mm equiv. focal length and fixed F1.7 aperture as the Mini 3 Pro. Instead of relying on a separate telephoto lens, you can crop in up to 2x digitally when shooting 12MP photos, which does result in a hit to image quality.

The Air 3 is the first in its series to offer a dual-camera system.

Photo: Kara Murphy

The Air 3 allows for 4K/60p video recording and 4K/100p for slow-motion clips, all of which can be captured using DJI’s D-Log M color profile for more flexible post-processing. The Air 3 also includes Night Mode, introduced with the Mavic 3 series; this feature allows you to record up to 4K/30p video at an ISO up to 12800. D-Log M (10-bit) is not supported, however.

The Mini 4 Pro can also record up to 4K/60p video and Slo-Mo 4K/100p footage. The Mini 4 Pro has D-Log M, too; however, as with the Air 3, it’s unavailable while shooting in Night Mode.

Intelligent Flight Modes

Both the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro offer QuickShots – Dronie, Circle, Helix, Rocket, Asteroid, and Boomerang. MasterShots – which performs a series of QuickShots and stitches them all together in the DJI Fly app – is available on both models. FocusTrack, which allows you to select a subject, typically a car or person, and follow it using Point of Interest, ActiveTrack, or Spotlight, is also included.

The Mini 4 Pro is the first DJI drone to introduce ActiveTrack 360º. Building on the original ActiveTrack, this iteration allows you to track a subject from all angles. While the Air 3 allows you to track your subject from the sides or behind, the Mini 4 Pro can also track from the front. A large trace wheel will appear at the bottom left-hand corner of your remote’s screen, and you can use your finger to create a custom path for the drone to fly around the subject.

The Mini 4 Pro introduced the ActiveTrack 360º feature. You can draw a path with your finger, and the drone will automatically follow that same course around your tracked subject.

Screenshot: Pilot Institute

What makes either the Mini 4 Pro or the Air 3 a worthwhile investment, however, is the inclusion of the Waypoints Flight feature. This feature allows you to set a predetermined flight path by customizing various parameters for each waypoint, including altitude, speed, and the camera’s orientation so that you can repeat a shot multiple times. The drone will then fly the course automatically in the order you designated or in reverse.

On the Air 3 and more advanced drones, including the Mavic 3 series, you’ll get more information in your app’s interface, including how long the drone takes to complete its course. On the Mini 4 Pro, you get sparse information and will know how long your pre-planned course will take when it starts. All missions can be saved and repeated.

DJI squeezed an auxiliary light onto the Mini 4 Pro while keeping it under 250g. It will activate when you launch and land the drone at night or in low-light conditions.

Photo: Kara Murphy

Another feature available on both drones is Cruise Control. You need to set either the ‘C1’ or ‘C2’ button in the Fly app to activate it. You’ll fly at a certain speed, and as soon as you hit the designated button, your drone will fly at a consistent speed. This is useful for longer flights and allows you to focus on camera maneuvers, altitude, and other effects.

I already own a Mini 3 Pro or Air 2S. Is it worth the upgrade?

The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are both significant upgrades from their predecessors. The Air 3 performs much better in flight, especially in higher winds, has obstacle avoidance in all directions, the Waypoints Flight feature, and far superior battery life. The Air 2S camera has a 20MP, 1-inch CMOS sensor. While the Air 3’s Type 1/1.3 camera can produce 48MP images, it uses a quad-bayer sensor and can sometimes produce less refined results.

Starting with the Mini 3 Pro (right) and now the Air 3 (left), DJI has significantly improved the design and functionality of its battery charging consoles.

Photo: Kara Murphy

The Mini 4 Pro’s camera uses the same Type 1/1.3 sensor as the Mini 3 Pro, and both are capable of True Vertical Shooting. Where this model shines is, once again, omnidirectional avoidance, Waypoints Flight, and the new Active Track 360º feature that can track a subject from every angle. It’s worth noting that if you’re like me and ever accidentally flew into a tree due to a lack of sensors on the side, having obstacle detection on every possible side is extremely helpful.

“The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are both major upgrades from their predecessors.”

Now that we’ve established that the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are, in fact, significant upgrades, we also need to talk about why they may only be for some. Even though they are more budget-friendly than the Mavic 3 series, they still need to be purchased with a new remote. If you already have a DJI RC or RC-N1 controller that you’re using with another drone, the Mini 3 Pro or Air 2S are more economically friendly choices. Ultimately, it comes down to what you’re willing to spend and what features you’re most excited about.

Which one is best for you?

Let’s try to answer this article’s underlying question: Which DJI drone, released in 2023, is right for you? I’ve flown both extensively and came to the following conclusions.

The Air 3

the Air 3 is ideal for photographers and videographers looking to shoot at different focal lengths and fly at higher altitudes or along coastlines where wind speeds pick up.

The Air 3’s body is 470g heavier than the Mini 4 Pro. That added weight makes it ready to scale tall buildings or mountainous areas. Plus, you get more advanced video and photo features – the maximum 8-second shutter speed can create cool light trail effects or enhance lower-light settings, for instance. The added flight time and extra camera can both be very nice to have, too.

Even though the Mini 4 Pro has omnidirectional obstacle detection and avoidance, it is still susceptible to colliding with small twigs or power wires. Same with the Air 3 or any other DJI drone. A prop cage, pictured, is a great tool for preserving the drone if it crashes or runs into a wall.

Photo: DJI

The Mini 4 Pro

The Mini 4 Pro is ideal for two types of remote pilots: the casual flyer or the professional remote pilot needing additional perks. As we covered in our extensive article on the forthcoming Remote ID ruling, any drone weighing less than 250g at takeoff does not need to be registered with the FAA – so long as it’s flown recreationally. That means you get some of DJI’s best features at your disposal without needing to register it with the FAA.

“The Air 3 is ideal for those looking to shoot at different focal lengths and fly at higher altitudes or along coastlines where wind speeds pick up.”

What I appreciate about the Mini 4 Pro or any Mini-series drone is that DJI has constructed a light prop guard cage that makes operating indoors a breeze. Whether you have the Mini 4 Pro, with omnidirectional obstacle detection and avoidance, or one of the original models with no sensors, the cage, in most cases, will cause the drone to bounce off a wall or object and keep moving.

The Air 3’s (right) build resembles the more advanced Mavic 3 (left). Both drones will likely hold up better in higher altitudes and windy conditions than smaller DJI models, such as the Air 2S and Mini series.

Photo: Kara Murphy

I taught my daughter to fly in our house, and we practiced during the winter when it was too cold to operate outside. It should be noted that the FAA’s airspace regulations do not apply indoors. A tiny, lightweight drone like the Mini 4 Pro is perfect for this use case.

“The Mini 4 Pro is ideal for two types of remote pilots: the casual flyer or the professional remote pilot who needs some additional perks.”

Ultimately, you’d want a Mini 4 Pro for affordable access to cool features such as ActiveTrack 360º and True Vertical shooting – this model is highly versatile thanks to its lengthy feature list. Although it’s less capable outdoors and has weaker imaging specs, you do get a lot for your money with this model. Ultimately, there are some distinct differences between the Air and Mini models, and you’ll need to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of both based on what you’re hoping to do with a drone.


Buy the DJI Mini 4 Pro:



Buy the DJI Air 3:




Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Image of Palestinian boy with amputated limbs wins World Press Photo of the Year

Published

on

By

Image of Palestinian boy with amputated limbs wins World Press Photo of the Year


World Press Photo has announced its 2025 Photo of the Year, along with two finalists, highlighting some of the most impactful photojournalism of the past year. 3,778 photographers submitted 59,320 photographs, and DPReview recently covered the category winners. This year’s top honor, revealed last night, was bestowed upon Samar Abu Elouf, a Palestinian photojournalist based in Doha, for The New York Times.

Her winning image is a portrait of Mahmoud Ajjour, a young boy wounded while fleeing an Israeli airstrike in Gaza in March 2024. The boy had turned his back to urge his family to move faster when an explosion tore through the street, severing one of his arms and damaging the other. It’s a stark depiction of the toll ongoing violence has taken on the denizens of the region.

Elouf was evacuated from Gaza in late 2023. She shares an apartment complex with Ajjor, the double amputee subject of her image. In recent months, she has continued to document the lives of a small number of severely-wounded Gazans who, like Mahmoud, were able to leave for medical treatment.

WPP-2025Contest-WestCentralAndSouthAsia-SIN-SamarAbuElouf
Mahmoud Ajjor has a modest goal: to receive prosthetic limbs and live like other children. By the end of 2024, the United Nations estimated that Gaza had the highest number of child amputees per capita in the world.

Copyright: © Samar Abu Elouf, for The New York Times

Two other finalists were selected as runners-up: John Moore for Night Crossing, depicting Chinese migrants warming themselves at the US-Mexico border at night. Musuk Nolte was also recognized for Droughts in the Amazon, capturing a young man bringing food to his mother in the drought-ridden village of Manacapuru.

WPP-2025Contest-NorthAndCentralAmerica-SIN-JohnMoore
Moore’s image of Chinese migrants warming themselves after a rainstorm, at the US-Mexico border, captures a moment of vulnerability that contrasts with how migration is depicted in mainstream talking points.

Copyright: © John Moore, United States, Getty Images

“I remain endlessly grateful for the photographers who, despite the personal risks and emotional costs, record these stories to give all of us the opportunity to understand, empathise, and be inspired to action,” said Joumana El Zein Khoury, World Press Photo’s Executive Director.

WPP-2025Contest-SouthAmerica-STO-MusukNolte-01
A young man carries food to his mother in Manacapuru, a village in the Amazon that was once accessible by boat. Now, the river has dried up due to drought, and he walks several kilometers across the cracked riverbed. A harsh reality: the world’s largest rainforest increasingly resembles a desert.

Copyright: © Musuk Nolte, Peru/Mexico, Panos Pictures, Bertha Foundation

The awarded stories will be shown to millions as part of the World Press Photo annual traveling exhibition in over 60 locations worldwide. These locations include the premiere in Amsterdam and then move on to other significant metropolises, including London, Rome, Berlin, Vienna, and Budapest. More information about the images and photographers can be found on the World Press Photo site.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Canon EOS R1 shooting experience: let's see it in action

Published

on

By

Canon EOS R1 shooting experience: let's see it in action


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Canon EOS R1 | RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z | 200mm | F4 | 1/1000 sec | ISO 3200
Photo: Mitchell Clark

Canon’s EOS R1 is the company’s first ‘1 series’ flagship camera to be mirrorless and is specifically aimed at sports and action photographers. Given its narrow focus, we wanted to test it out at a professional sports game – preferably one supported by its Action Priority autofocus mode, which Canon says will recognize when players are performing a specific action and automatically focus on them.

Thankfully, we were able to get a media pass to photograph a Spokane Velocity FC game, which was the perfect opportunity to put the EOS R1 to the test. A caveat before we start: I am by no means a professional sports photographer, nor am I a football expert. However, part of the pitch for Action Priority autofocus is that it’s able to react to what’s happening in the game automatically, which made this an especially interesting test of its abilities, even though most people looking likely to buy an R1 are fully capable of shooting a game without it.

So how’d it do? Quite well, I found. It made shooting feel natural; I would move the camera along with the action, and most of the time, it just handled subject selection, making sure the player in control of the ball was the one in focus. However, it clearly wasn’t a magical replacement for talent, either. There were a few times it decided to track a player who wasn’t involved in the action, though it was relatively easy to correct it by manually putting the AF tracking point over the player.

1N0A9322
RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z | 200mm | F2.8 | 1/1000 sec | ISO 1600
Photo: Mitchell Clark

Despite its occasional missteps, upon reviewing my shots, I found that Action Priority mode got me far better results than the combination of my football-tracking skills and standard subject recognition did. The EOS R1 was very tenacious at tracking people and excelled at keeping them in focus – which is great if you have the skill and knowledge necessary to know who to track and when to start tracking someone else.

I actually got the chance to talk to someone with those skills. One of the professional photographers at the game asked what I was shooting with, then said they also use an EOS R1; previously, they’d used an EOS R3. When I asked what they thought of the Action Priority mode, they said they didn’t think it made much of a difference. Given that they’d essentially trained themselves to do what it does, it’s not surprising that they didn’t find it as useful as I – someone without that training – did. However, they did find the EOS R1’s standard subject detection to be stickier than the EOS R3’s, especially when players were passing in front of and behind each other.

They were very fond of the camera’s Eye Control autofocus, where the camera automatically places the focus point on whatever you’re looking at. Despite having calibrated it a few times, I couldn’t get it to work reliably enough for me to be an asset rather than a liability. I tried it for a little bit at the game but ended up turning it off. However, it’s easy to see how it could improve the shooting experience if it does work for you – rather than relying on the camera to figure out what player is important, you can just follow the action with your eye.

Getting back to Action Priority mode, I did bump up against a few limitations with the system. It’s only available when using the electronic shutter and can’t be used with the EOS R1’s anti-flicker feature. While the camera’s readout is jaw-droppingly quick – I didn’t notice any rolling shutter artifacts on soccer balls in mid-flight – you will still see banding on electronic screens and under some LED lights.

EOS-R1-Electronic-sign-banding
You can eliminate banding by switching to the mechanical shutter, but doing so means giving up some of the EOS R1’s features and capabilities.

Electronic shutter | RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z | 200mm | F2.8 | 1/1000 sec | Edited to taste in ACR
Photo: Mitchell Clark

The former was definitely an issue at the Spokane One stadium, and I found myself having to choose between giving myself a better chance of capturing the game with Action Priority and not having some quite distracting artifacts in the background. With that said the mechanical shutter on the EOS R1 can only shoot at 12fps instead of 40, which helped make the decision a bit easier.

I also found myself wishing that the pre-burst capture feature was configurable. The amount it buffers is based on your shooting speed: Canon’s manual says that in the 40 shots per second mode, it’ll buffer around half a second, but there’s no setting to control for how long or how many shots you’d like it to buffer.

Because my shooting style involves starting focus tracking with a half-press of the shutter button well before actually taking the photo, I wound up filling almost a third of my storage in the first half-hour of the game since every shot I took saved the 20 shots before it. Rather than trying to get myself used to back-button focusing, which doesn’t start pre-capture*, in the middle of the game, I just turned it off, but I feel like I could’ve gotten a few more good shots if I could’ve used the pre-burst capture, but set to only save five or ten photos from before the shutter press.

* And, in fact, cannot be set to start pre-capture, something that irked the pro I talked to.

1N0A6263
It took me a while to get a header shot, which I strongly suspect would’ve been easier with pre-capture.

RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z + RF 1.4x Teleconvertor 150mm | F4 | 1/100 | ISO 320
Photo: Mitchell Clark

Also, Canon, while I have your attention, why can’t I set one of my custom buttons to turn pre-burst capture on and off? To get around this, I followed Brian Worley’s trick of setting up a custom mode that’s exactly the same as my manual shooting mode, except with pre-capture off, but even that’s a bad solution. For one, there’s only one button you can assign to switch between modes, but also, if I made any changes while I was shooting pre-capture, those wouldn’t be carried over when I switched modes to turn it off.

While I’ve picked a lot of nits here, there were, unsurprisingly, a lot of things the EOS R1 did right. Its buffer felt endless – during the game, the camera only ever stopped shooting when I took my finger off the shutter, and never because it had to stop and write the photos to the card. At home, I let it run at 40fps for around 20 seconds and still didn’t reach the bottom of the buffer.

Being able to let the camera run at 40fps means you can capture the entire moment without having to worry about whether you captured the key shot.

The battery had a similar amount of stamina. Over the course of the 90-ish minute game I shot mostly using the viewfinder and took around 9000 photos. (If you’re not confident that you can capture the decisive moment, you might as well capture every moment.) At the end of the day, I still had three out of four bars of battery and would’ve felt quite comfortable shooting for another 90 minutes. I couldn’t have, of course, but the camera could.

That’s probably the moral of the story. It’s no shock that using the EOS R1 didn’t immediately make me a pro sports photographer. Action Priority mode did, however, let me capture moments that only pro sports photographers could’ve not so long ago, and I suspect that Eye Control could’ve done the same if I could get it to work reliably for me.

It’s easy to imagine that sort of thing being really exciting as it makes its way into more accessible models – there’s always been something of a Catch-22 where entry-level cameras aimed at beginners come with the autofocus systems that offer the least assistance. Something like Action Priority mode or Eye Control could help parents capture their children’s sporting achievements without requiring them to become pro photographers or buy high-end cameras that cost thousands of dollars.

1N0A7878
RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z | 200mm | F4 | 1/1000 | ISO 1250
Photo: Mitchell Clark

That future may be a ways off, though, and it doesn’t really help tell the story of the EOS R1, a camera almost exclusively for pros. That’s not to say that they won’t use those features, just that they’ll have different considerations when doing so; is Action Priority worth narrowing your shooting options and giving up some manual control so you can fully focus on composition and understanding the state of play, and can you rely on Eye Control when everything’s on the line?

Realistically, I’m not the person to answer those questions. However, it’s interesting that Canon added so many features designed to make a camera that’ll likely only ever be used by professionals easier to use. It’s like getting into an F1 car and discovering that, alongside all the manual controls, it actually has a quite capable self-driving system. The surprising part isn’t that the EOS R1 was up to the task of shooting the game – it’s essentially designed from the ground up to do that – but I wasn’t expecting it to also help me out so much along the way.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Sony World Photography Awards 2025 reveals its Photographer of the Year

Published

on

By

Sony World Photography Awards 2025 reveals its Photographer of the Year


Sony World Photography Awards Overall Winners

Sony’s World Photography Awards celebrated the 18th edition of its Overall Winners competition with a gala ceremony in London. Ten professional category winners received recognition for their work across multiple genres, including architecture, wildlife, portraiture, and landscape. Each winner participated in Insights, a day of industry talks, and received Sony digital imaging equipment as a prize.

British photographer Zed Nelson was named Photographer of the Year for The Anthropocene Illusion, a six-years-in-the-making documentary project examining how humans shape and simulate nature in an increasingly artificial world. He will have the opportunity to present an additional body of work at next year’s Sony World Photography Awards 2026 exhibition.

Olivier Unia was awarded Open Photographer of the Year for his image of a traditional Moroccan equestrian performance. Micaela Vidivia Medina was awarded Student Photographer of the Year for her series about incarcerated women in Chile’s prisons. Daniel Dian-Ji Wu won Youth Photographer of the Year for a skateboarding silhouette shot at sunset in Venice Beach, California.

Acclaimed documentary photographer Susan Meiselas was honored with the Outstanding Contribution to Photography award. Sixty of her images will be featured with more than 300 total prints, including the competition’s second and third-place finalists from the World Photography Awards, at Somerset House in London from April 17th to May 5th. You can see all of the winning images on the contest website, worldphoto.org.

Photographer of the Year

© Zed Nelson  United Kingdom  Photographer of the Year  Professional competition  Wildlife   Nature  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 3

Photographer: Zed Nelson

Series title: The Anthropocene Illusion

Description: In a tiny fraction of Earth’s history, humans have altered the world beyond anything it has experienced in tens of millions of years. Scientists are calling it a new epoch: The Anthropocene – the age of human. Future geologists will find evidence in the rock strata of an unprecedented human impact on our planet, from huge concentrations of plastics to the fallout from the burning of fossil fuels, and vast deposits of concrete used to build our cities.

We are forcing animals and plants to extinction by removing their habitats, and divorcing ourselves from the land we once roamed. Yet we cannot face the true scale of our loss. Somewhere within us the desire for contact with nature remains. ‘So, while we devastate the world around us, we have become masters of a stage-managed, artificial ‘experience’ of nature – a reassuring spectacle, an illusion.’

Over six years, and across four continents, Zed Nelson has explored how we immerse ourselves in increasingly choreographed and simulated environments to mask our destructive impact on the natural world.

Camera & equipment: Hasselblad X1D, D810, Mamiya RZ67, D850

Copyright: © Zed Nelson, United Kingdom, Photographer of the Year, Professional competition, Wildlife & Nature, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Open Photographer of the Year: Motion Category

© Olivier Unia  France  Open Photographer of the Year  Open Competition  Motion  Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Photographer: Olivier Unia

Series title: Tbourida La Chute

Description: Many of the photographs taken during a traditional Moroccan ‘tbourida’ show the riders firing their rifles. With this image, the photographer wanted to share another side of the event, and show how dangerous it can be when a rider is thrown from their mount.

Camera: Sony a7 IV

Copyright: © Olivier Unia, France, Open Photographer of the Year, Open Competition, Motion, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Architecture & Design

© Ulana Switucha  Canada  Winner  Professional competition  Architecture   Design  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 1

Photographer: Ulana Switucha

Series title: The Tokyo Toilet Project

Description: The Tokyo Toilet Project is an urban redevelopment project in Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan that involves the design and construction of modern public restrooms that encourages their use. The distinctive buildings are as much works of art as they are a public convenience. These images are part of a larger body of work documenting the architectural aesthetics of these structures in their urban environment.

Camera: Nikon Z7

Copyright: © Ulana Switucha, Canada, Winner, Professional competition, Architecture & Design, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Creative

© Rhiannon Adam  United Kingdom  Winner  Professional competition  Creative  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 6

Photographer: Rhiannon Adam

Series title: Rhi-Entry

Description: Throughout history, 117 billion humans have gazed at the same moon, yet only 24 people – all American men – have seen its surface up close. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the artist discovered an application for the ultimate art residency: dearMoon. In 2018, Japanese billionaire and art collector Yusaku Maezawa announced a global search for eight artists to join him on a week-long lunar mission aboard SpaceX’s Starship – the first civilian mission to deep space.

The mission’s flight path would echo that of Apollo 8’s 1968 journey, which famously led astronaut Bill Anders to suggest NASA ‘should have sent poets’ to capture the sense of wonder he experienced. In 2021, Rhiannon Adam was chosen as the only female crew member from one million applicants, with the chance to achieve the seemingly impossible. For three years she immersed herself in the space industry, until, in June 2024, Maezawa abruptly canceled the mission, leaving the crew to pick up the pieces of their disrupted lives.

Camera & equipment: Polaroid SLR 680, RZ-67 pro II, Canon 5D MKIV, Wista Field, Apple Mac screenshot, iPhone 15 Pro Max, Canon EOS R

Copyright: © Rhiannon Adam, United Kingdom, Winner, Professional competition, Creative, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Documentary Projects

© Toby Binder  Germany  Winner  Professional competition  Documentary Projects  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 2

Photographer: Toby Binder

Series title: Divided Youth of Belfast

Description: ‘If I had been born at the top of my street, behind the corrugated-iron border, I would have been British. Incredible to think. My whole idea of myself, the attachments made to a culture, heritage, religion, nationalism and politics are all an accident of birth. I was one street away from being born my “enemy.”’ Paul McVeigh, Belfast-born novelist.

Binder notes ‘there is hardly any other country in Europe where a past conflict is still as present in daily life as it is in Northern Ireland.’ It is not only the physical barriers – the walls and fences – but also the psychological divisions in society. For many years, Toby Binder has been documenting what it means for young people, all of whom were born after the peace agreement was signed, to grow up under this intergenerational tension in both Protestant and Catholic neighbourhoods.

Camera & equipment: Leica Q2, Mamiya 645 PRO TL

Copyright: © Toby Binder, Germany, Winner, Professional competition, Documentary Projects, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Environment

© Nicolás Garrido Huguet  Peru  Winner  Professional competition  Environment  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 9

Photographer: Nicolás Garrido Huguet

Series title: Alquimia Textil

Description: Alquimia Textil is a collaborative project undertaken by Nicolás Garrido Huguet and researcher and fashion designer María Lucía Muñoz, which showcases the natural dyeing techniques practiced by the artisans of Pumaqwasin in Chinchero, Cusco, Peru. The project aims to bring visibility to, and help preserve, these ancestral dyeing practices, which demand many hours of meticulous work that is often underestimated within the textile sector.

Industrial methods are close to displacing these traditional dyeing processes completely, while climate change threatens the plants that are crucial to these practices. These photographs feature three dye types: qolle (Buddleja coriacea), a shrub with yellow-producing flowers; ch’illka (Baccharis sp.), a shrub whose leaves and stems yield ochre and green hues; and cochineal (Dactylopius coccus), an Andean insect producing reds, carmines and purples in a broad color spectrum.

Camera & equipment: EM, Epson scanner v550, Nikon Z7 II, Mamiya RB67

Copyright: © Nicolás Garrido Huguet, Peru, Winner, Professional competition, Environment, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Landscape

© Seido Kino  Japan  Winner  Professional competition  Landscape  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 7

Photographer: Seido Kino

Series title: The Strata of Time

Description: This project invites viewers to consider what it means for a country to grow, and the advantages and disadvantages linked to that growth, by overlaying archival photographs from the 1940s-60s within current scenes of the same location. Early in Japan’s period of rapid economic growth from 1945 to 1973, the trade-off for affluence was pollution in many parts of the country. As an island, its land and resource constraints also led to an uneven population distribution.

Camera: Nikon D850

Copyright: © Seido Kino, Japan, Winner, Professional competition, Landscape, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Perspectives

© Laura Pannack  United Kingdom  Winner  Professional competition  Perspectives  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 9

Photographer: Laura Pannack

Series title: The Journey Home From School

Description: Making our way home from school is a simple, nostalgic, universal activity that we can all relate to. This project explores the tumultuous public lives of young people in the gang-governed Cape Flats area of Cape Town, South Africa, where their daily commute carries the risk of death.

Using handmade, lo-fi experimental techniques, this project explores how young people have to walk to and from school avoiding the daily threat of gang crossfire. Through poetry, analogue photography, drawings, collages and cyanotypes, an intimate portrayal of adolescence amidst stark social divides is created that offers a rare insight into this confusing and challenging world.

Camera & equipment: EZ Controller, 500cm

Copyright: © Laura Pannack, United Kingdom, Winner, Professional competition, Perspectives, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Portraiture

© Gui Christ  Brazil  Winner  Professional competition  Portraiture  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 7

Photographer: Gui Christ

Series title: M’kumba

Description: M’kumba is an ongoing project that illustrates the resilience of Afro-Brazilian communities in the face of local religious intolerance. Its name derives from an ancient Kongo word for spiritual leaders, before it was distorted by local society to demean African religions. For more than 300 years, nearly 5 million African people were brought to Brazil.

They lost their freedom, and their spiritualities were persecuted by colonial ideologies. Until 1970, Afro-Brazilian religions were criminalised, and due to longstanding prejudice they still face violence – more than 2,000 attacks were reported in 2024 alone. Although 56 per cent of Brazilians are of Afro-descent, fewer than 2 per cent identify as Afro-religious due to fear of persecution.

As an Afro-religious priest in training, Gui Christ wanted to photograph a proud, young generation representing African deities and mythological tales. Through intimate imagery, this project challenges prejudice while celebrating these spiritual traditions as vital to Brazil’s cultural identity.

Camera: Canon EOS R5

Copyright: © Gui Christ, Brazil, Winner, Professional competition, Portraiture, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Sport

© Chantal Pinzi  Italy  Winner  Professional competition  Sport  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 2

Photographer: Chantal Pinzi

Series title: Shred the Patriarchy

Description: M’kumba is an ongoing project that illustrates the resilience of Afro-Brazilian communities in the face of local religious intolerance. Its name derives from an ancient Kongo word for spiritual leaders, before it was distorted by local society to demean African religions.

For more than 300 years, nearly 5 million African people were brought to Brazil. They lost their freedom, and their spiritualities were persecuted by colonial ideologies. Until 1970, Afro-Brazilian religions were criminalised, and due to longstanding prejudice they still face violence – more than 2,000 attacks were reported in 2024 alone. Although 56 per cent of Brazilians are of Afro-descent, fewer than 2 per cent identify as Afro-religious due to fear of persecution.

As an Afro-religious priest in training, Gui Christ wanted to photograph a proud, young generation representing African deities and mythological tales. Through intimate imagery, this project challenges prejudice while celebrating these spiritual traditions as vital to Brazil’s cultural identity.

Camera: Canon EOS R5

Copyright: © Chantal Pinzi, Italy, Winner, Professional competition, Sport, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Professional Category Winner: Still Life

© Peter Franck  Germany  Winner  Professional competition  Still Life  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 - 2

Photographer: Peter Franck

Series title: Still Waiting

Description: Still Waiting presents collages that capture moments of pause, of waiting. They depict the liminal space between events, a threshold where time seems to stretch, and meanings remain unfixed. The juxtaposition of objects within the space leaves room for interpretation, inviting surreal flights of thought. Everything is suspended, held in a fragile equilibrium where intervention feels imminent. Just fractions of a second away from some decisive action, the images linger in a fleeting moment of stillness, a breath before the world moves again.

Camera: N/A (unknown)

Copyright: © Peter Franck, Germany, Winner, Professional competition, Still Life, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Student Photographer of the Year

© Micaela Valdivia Medina  Peru  Student Photographer of the Year  Student Competition  Sony World Photography Awards 2025 5

Photographer: Micaela Valdivia Medina

Series title: The Last Day We Saw the Mountains and the Sea

Description: This project explores the complexity of female prison spaces and the people who inhabit them, from the inmates to their families. The series consists of photographs of the architecture of the prisons, the neighbourhoods they are in, and the dynamics at the visitor and family member entrances. This project was carried out at the women's penitentiary centres of San Miguel, San Joaquín and Valparaíso, between the months of March and July 2024.

Camera & equipment: Canon EOS R, iPhone 12

Copyright: © Micaela Valdivia Medina, Peru, Student Photographer of the Year, Student Competition, Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Youth Photographer of the Year

© Daniel Dian-Ji Wu  Taiwan  Youth Photographer of the Year  Youth Competition  Sony World Photography Awards 2025

Photographer: Daniel Dian-Ji Wu

Image title: Eclipse of Motion

Description: Daniel Dian-Ji Wu took this photo during summer break in 2024, at Venice Beach Skatepark in LA during golden hour. The photographer captured this image of a skater mid-air, silhouetted against the sunset, expressing the raw energy of that moment. He says this image ‘made me feel a sense of passion and freedom.’

Camera & equipment: Sony a7 IV

Copyright: © Daniel Dian-Ji Wu, Taiwan, Youth Photographer of the Year, Youth Competition, Sony World Photography Awards 2025



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending