Connect with us

Camera

The need for (transfer) speed: Five full-featured Thunderbolt 3 docks compared

Published

on

The need for (transfer) speed: Five full-featured Thunderbolt 3 docks compared

Intro

There’s no shortage of Thunderbolt dock options on the market. We took a look at five different units and compared them by price, features, and speed.

The new Apple M1 Mac Mini has a lot going for it: it’s an amazing machine in a small form factor. Unfortunately, in what seems to be a continuing Apple trend, it has lost a couple of Thunderbolt ports over the previous version. Enter the Thunderbolt dock: a must-have solution for a lot of photographers and videographers looking to connect multiple high-speed drives and/or other peripherals to machines with minimal connection points.

In this article, we’ll compare five popular Thunderbolt 3 Docks based on price, features, and speed to crown a winner. All of the docks in this comparison are capable of connecting to fast drives via USB-C and most offer built-in high-speed SD card readers as well as additional connectivity for various peripherals.

All of the docks in this comparison are capable of connecting to fast drives via USB-C and most offer built-in high-speed SD card readers as well as additional connectivity for various peripherals

Below you can see how these five docks stack up, on paper:

Price Power delivery over Thunderbolt USB-C ports

(10Gb/s)

USB-A ports

(10Gb/s)

Thunderbolt pass though USB-A ports

(5Gb/s)

StarTech TB3DK2DPM2 $330 85w 1 0 Yes 2
Hyperdrive GEN2 16-Port $300 85w 2 2 Yes 3
Plugable TBT3-UDC3 $219 96w 2 1 No 2
Corsair TBT100 $250 85w 2 0 No 2
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock $250 85w 1 0 Yes 5

Note: Manufacturer availability was a factor in the docks we included. If your favorite Thunderbolt dock is not represented here, please mention it in the comments. We’ll look to update this comparison in the not-too-distant future.

We’ll start first with an overview of each dock, including its design, features and included accessories, and we’ll follow up with a series of benchmarks where we pit all the docks against each other to see which drives excel in which areas.


StarTech TB3DK2DPM2

$330 | StarTech

The StarTech hides its key feature on the bottom of the case.

This StarTech dock has a single front-facing USB-A port running at 5Gb/s and a USB-C port running at 10Gb/s. There’s also a UHS-II SD Card slot and separate microphone and headphone sockets. At the back is where you find the upstream and downstream Thunderbolt connections as well as a Gigabit Ethernet jack, a second 5Gb/s USB-A socket, and finally a DisplayPort connector. Included in the box is a 17-inch Thunderbolt 3 cable.

This dock is the only product here that offers the ability to insert an SSD into the enclosure

One thing that you notice right away is the size of the included power supply, which is larger than the dock itself. This is due to the power delivery requirements needed for attached devices so that a single cable hookup can be used for charging your laptop and the data connection.

This dock is the only product here that offers the ability to insert an SSD into the enclosure (specifically, an M2 80mm NVME drive) for integrated storage. StarTech says the enclosure supports transfer speeds up to 1.5GB/s, but your mileage may vary. Note: it will not work with the SATA variant as the internal slot is not compatible.

Some NVME drives may prove a tight fit, especially if they are double-sided.

On to a small issue, the compartment’s lid already has a rather thick thermal pad attached. I found this interfered with the fit of my drive as supplied and you may find a similar issue if your drive has a heat spreader already attached. The XPG drive I used was double-sided, but the lid closed properly after removing the pad.

Upstream and downstream Thunderbolt ports are handy for adding fast SSDs.

All in all, I had no issues with the StarTech dock, although it can get warm in use, especially if you’re using an NVME drive in the internal enclosure. But overall, it offers a nice mix of speed and connectivity.

What we liked

  • Ability to add internal SSD storage to the dock
  • Separate headphone and microphone sockets

What we didn’t like


Hyperdrive GEN2 16-Port

$300 | Hyperdrive

Monolithic in design; the Hyperdrive takes up less desk space and includes a wide selection of ports.

The second dock I looked at is the diminutive unit from Hyperdrive. This small and dense unit with its solid all-metal construction has dual digital as well as analog audio ports, which is unusual. It also has full-size and micro SD slots supporting UHS-II cards.

If direct digital audio is important to you then the Hyperdrive has both Coax and Toslink connections.

It supports 10Gb/s speeds via dual front-facing USB-A ports in addition to a USB-C port. It also has the usual single 3.5mm socket with headset support. Additionally, there’s a front-mounted USB-A port that supports power delivery standard for charging devices (but it has no data capability). At the back are the two Thunderbolt ports and connection points for Gigabit Ethernet, a DisplayPort connection, and another 3 USB-A ports with 5Gb/s speeds. If direct digital audio is important to you then the Hyperdrive has both Coax and Toslink connections.

There’s a small power LED on the front of the unit which can be difficult to see in bright lighting. The included Thunderbolt cable is 17 inches long. As is the case with any of these docks, you might find the length of the included cable quite short, but this is to keep to the advertised speeds. Longer aftermarket active Thunderbolt cables are available, but these cost more and are available in copper or optical versions.

Digital audio is not something you often find on most Thunderbolt docks. This combined with twin Thunderbolt connections and a lot of USB sockets makes this dock extremely flexible.

I should mention that the SD card sockets on this dock are inverted from the norm, so if you want to put this horizontally on your desk, you need to insert your cards with the label face-down or flip the whole unit.

This dock is designed primarily for vertical orientation and while there’s nothing to stop that from happening, I found it to be a bit unstable in practice. The design would be better if a stand or rubber feet were supplied to stop it from slipping on a desk.

What we liked

  • Well-built, small footprint (when used vertically)
  • Large number of connections including three at 10Gb/s
  • Dedicated front-facing USB-A charging port
  • Digital and analog audio ports

What we didn’t like

  • Limited stability in a vertical position

Plugable TBT3-UDC3

$219 | Plugable

A budget option, but it’s missing more than a high price tag.

The Plugable is the most affordable dock we looked at and also one of the smallest. It ships with a longer cable than most of the docks here (28.5 inches) and also includes an active DisplayPort to HDMI adaptor in the box. Considering the cost of these items by themselves, this might be a deal clincher. However, it does lack a second Thunderbolt port for daisy-chaining devices.

The Plugable is the most affordable dock we looked at and also one of the smallest

This is another unit with three 10Gb/s ports, all around-back, including two USB-C and one USB-A. It also has both DisplayPort and HDMI sockets, although on an M1 Mac you can’t use both at the same time.

As usual, you also get a Gigabit Ethernet support and a 3.5mm headset socket as well as two more 5Gb/s USB-A ports on the front. It’s also has a large LED power indicator on top and a side-mounted Kensington lock slot.

You get a total of three 10Gb/s USB Ports on the Plugable.

With the smaller than usual volume, you have to sacrifice something and with this dock, and we’ve lost the ability to use SD cards; there’s also no second Thunderbolt socket. Then again, it’s all about balancing requirements with form factor and cost.

What we liked

  • Included cable options
  • Three 10Gb/s USB Ports
  • Price and size

What we didn’t like

  • No SD Card slot
  • No Thunderbolt passthrough
  • Glossy black front and back panel are prone to show scratches

Back to top


Corsair TBT100

$250 | Corsair

Corsair’s offering is the only one here to include a power button.

The next dock comes from one of the heavy hitters in the PC space, Corsair. There’s a certain visual appeal to this dock with its rounded edges, matt grey and black finish, and low profile design. Corsair has decided to include a power button and like the Plugable dock, you also get a longer-than-normal 25-inch Thunderbolt 3 cable.

This dock offers a lot of versatility, as long as you don’t need a second Thunderbolt port or front-facing USB-A connectivity

This dock offers a front-facing USB-C socket, an SD card slot (with UHS-II support), and a headset port. At the rear your find a single Thunderbolt port, twin HDMIs, and two USB-A (5Gb/s) ports. There’s also a USB-C port as well as the usual Gigabit Ethernet jack, as well as a Kensington lock slot.

Initially, I had some disappointing results when testing read/write speeds for the SD card reader. For some reason, the speeds were well below what should have been possible. This was rectified by power cycling the dock.

There’s no Thunderbolt pass-through here, but you do get a second 10Gb/s USB-C port on the back.

This dock offers a lot of versatility, as long as you don’t need a second Thunderbolt port or front-facing USB-A connectivity. It’s also one of the more elegant designs.

What we liked

  • Appealing design
  • Length of included cable

What we didn’t like

  • No front-facing USB-A port
  • No Thunderbolt pass-through

OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock

$250 | OWC Digital

While the OWC might give you everything you would need in terms of connections, the black plastic top is prone to showing scratches and fingerprints.

This offering from OWC gives you five USB 3.1 Gen1 ports, four on the back and one on the front. Two of these support high power devices (1.5A) and a 17-inch Thunderbolt cable is included in the box. Like a couple of other docks here you also get a Thunderbolt pass-through connection around the back as well as the usual Gigabit Ethernet socket.

This dock gives you just about everything you want in terms of connections. That said we’d happily give up one of the many 5Gb/s USB-A ports for the faster version

As with the Hyperdrive, it also gives you digital audio out, although this time it’s optical only and you do get the usual headset output on the front. It’s the only dock in this article that connects via mini DisplayPort for the video output and there’s no dongle in the box. You also get both a UHS-II SD and micro SD card slot at the front. Additionally, on the underside are two LEDs (green and blue) indicating host Thunderbolt connection and power status.

The OWC offers a Thunderbolt pass-through socket and a Mini DisplayPort socket to connect your monitor.

When testing the font USB-C port I was slightly surprised to find that it was quite a bit slower than the other docks on test here. This is because this socket uses a dedicated PCI-e Gen 3 x 1 lane. In practice, this means that while you only get about 8Gb/s it’s not throttled by any other port when in use. From a design point of view, I was a little disappointed to see that the top and bottom are both pieces of glossy black plastic that tend to show up fingerprints and scratches long term.

This dock gives you just about everything you want in terms of connections. That said I’d happily give up one of the 5Gb/s USB-A ports for the faster version, although it does offer a couple of advantages over the similarly priced Corsair dock.

What we liked

  • Good selection of ports
  • Optical digital audio out
  • Value for money

What we didn’t like

  • Glossy top and bottom panel
  • Mini DisplayPort output

Speed test

Thunderbolt and NVME speeds in these tests are with an ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB. For USB-C testing it was placed in a Sabrent Tool-Less USB-C enclosure and for Thunderbolt speeds, the same drive was placed in an Orico Thunderbolt enclosure. A 32GB SanDisk Extreme Pro UHS-II SD card was used to test the card reader speeds.

Tests were conducted using the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test app, the file size was set to 5GB and results were averaged over 5 runs.

UHS-II read UHS-II write TB read TB write NVME write NVME
read
USB-C read USB-C
write
StarTech TB3DK2DPM2 244 186 1405 956 1356 1073 723 654
Hyperdrive GEN2 16-Port 265 231 1409 973 n/a n/a 930 903
Plugable TBT3-UDC3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 928 922
Corsair TBT100 256 211 n/a n/a n/a n/a 945 929
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock 255 205 1375 1043 n/a n/a 764 694

*All speeds recorded in MB/s.

The Hyperdrive dock offers the fastest UHS-II read and write speeds of the bunch, but not by a huge margin. Similarly, those docks with Thunderbolt connections all delivered similar read and write speeds, with the OWC dock being just a bit faster than the competition. In terms of USB-C speeds, the Corsair dock came out on top (again, not by much), with the Plugable and Hyperdrive docks following close behind.


Conclusion

After working with each of these for a while, I chose the Hyperdrive for long-term use. The balance of good transfer speeds, the number of ports, and the small footprint led me to choose it as my daily driver.

However, just because this is the best dock for me doesn’t mean it will work best for you. You need to work out what’s best for your particular workflow. Do you need to connect up a lot of kit? How fast do the ports need to be? And if you’re using these with a laptop, do they pass through enough power for charging your battery?

I chose the Hyperdrive for long-term use. The balance of good transfer speeds, the number of ports, and the small footprint lead me to choose it as my daily driver

The Plugable is the only one here with 96W support for charging and the StarTech is the only one with an NVME drive slot built-in. If you need digital audio then the Hyperdrive ticks that box and has faster UHS-II speeds as well. The Corsair gives very good UHS-II speeds and also has two 10Gb/s USB-C ports. The OWC gives you a good balance of the number and type of ports and is a great value.

Of course, you could always combine more than one if your budget allows. And things are about to get more complicated with the introduction of Thunderbolt 4.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Tips for taking epic shots of tonight’s ‘blood moon’ total lunar eclipse

Published

on

By

Tips for taking epic shots of tonight’s ‘blood moon’ total lunar eclipse


A lunar eclipse, captured by Jamie Malcolm-Brown in November 2021. Used with permission.

Editor’s note: This article was originally published in 2022. We have updated it with information about the current eclipse as a service to readers.


Starting tonight, March 13, through the early hours of tomorrow, March 14th, skywatchers in the Americas will be able to view the first total lunar eclipse of the year. The moon will turn a ‘blood red’ hue for a brief period as it passes entirely into the Earth’s shadow when lined up with the sun. Depending on where you are located, there is a specific time you can witness this phenomenon.

Time and Date, a top-ranking site for times and timezones, created a useful tool that allows you to make a plan by entering your viewing location. From there, it gives you pertinent information, including the total duration, what time each phase of the eclipse starts and the direction it’ll travel, plus altitude during these phases. A helpful animation gives you a visual of how it will appear, minute by minute, once it starts.

Details of the March 13  2025 total lunar eclipse
Time and Date created a free tool to help you plan your total lunar eclipse viewing, depending on your location. This is the data for Seattle, WA, where DPReview’s headquarters is located.

If you plan on bringing your camera out for the ‘blood moon’, photographer Jamie Malcolm-Brown has some helpful tips for camera settings. Describing his process for capturing a lunar eclipse in 2021, he tells DPReview that ‘it was taken with [a] 200-600mm lens at 600mm, ISO 800, F6.3, at 1/3 sec. I bracketed the shots at 5 shots with an EV (exposure value) change of 1. Next time I would probably bracket 5 shots but with only an EV change of .3. The final image was cropped fairly significantly to fill the frame with the moon.’

While useful for capturing more detail on the moon’s surface, you don’t necessarily need a long lens that extends to 600mm to photograph the blood moon. John Weatherby released a quick, helpful tutorial on Instagram outlining his process for getting the best images possible. For one, you can shoot at a focal length between 100–200mm if you want to include a foreground.

Weatherby also explains that having a sturdy tripod and ball head is an absolute necessity. Ensuring that the lens is locked in securely will yield clearer images of the moon. Using the camera’s shutter delay or self-timer, or an external remote, will also help prevent blurry shots as the camera is likely to shake a bit once you press the shutter. PhotoPills, an app that helps you identify where the moon will travel in accordance with your specific location, is recommended as well.

It’s important to check the weather in your area as cloud coverage can potentially conceal the moon completely. Windy.com is a free app available on desktop, iOS and Android that, in my opinion, does a decent job of forecasting weather patterns. It’ll give you a visual of where clouds will appear at specific dates and times so you can determine the best place to set up in your state or country.

Screen Shot 2022-05-15 at 12.59.27 AM
Windy.com, a free app, is an effective tool for forecasting weather elements, including cloud coverage.

The next total lunar eclipse will take place on September 7, and will be visible in parts of Asia, Africa and Australia. If skywatching interests you, you’re in or near one of the locations where the eclipse is visible and weather permits, I recommend getting out for a few hours and witnessing this wonderful event first-hand.





Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Fast and fun: Photographer captures the thrill of Formula 1 with Lego

Published

on

By

Fast and fun: Photographer captures the thrill of Formula 1 with Lego


Photo: Benedek Lampert

This weekend marks the start of the 2025 Formula 1 season, and one photographer is kicking things off with a series of photographs to celebrate. With a fine focus on detail and many hours of work, toy photographer Benedek Lampert has recreated F1 moments using Lego. This project is just the latest for Lampert, who has previously created life-like scenes of Lego versions of the Eiffel Tower and Shackleton’s Endurance.

In September 2024, Lego and F1 announced a partnership that included releasing numerous F1 Lego sets, some of which featured more realistic-looking models of F1 team cars. Lampert managed to get his hands on the entire starting grid and set to work on creating highly detailed, life-like photographs of the Lego F1 cars.

Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Photos: Benedek Lampert

As with all of Lampert’s work, nearly everything was done in camera. “It’s extremely important to me that these are actual photos and not AI-generated graphics,” he explained. That meant lots of hands-on time to build sets and problem-solve special effects. He built the track scenery and crafted unique sets that allowed him to get motion blur, spinning wheels, smoke and water vapor without any editing work. Lampert explained that the only thing he added while editing was the cloud texture in the sky and rear lights in one image.

All said and done, Lampert says the project took 70 hours for the 10 final images. The photo shoot portion of the project took five days, with ten to twelve-hour days at times. You can see how he meticulously created each image in the behind-the-scenes video below, as well as the photos in the gallery above.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Inspiringly simple: Sigma BF review-in-progress

Published

on

By

Inspiringly simple: Sigma BF review-in-progress


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.
Product photos: Richard Butler

The Sigma BF is a minimalist 24MP full-frame mirrorless camera that offers distinctive design and an unconventional user interface.

Key specifications

  • 24MP full-frame CMOS sensor
  • Phase detection AF with human and animal detection
  • No mechanical shutter
  • 3.2″ 2.1M dot rear touchscreen
  • Pressure-sensitive buttons with haptic feedback
  • 6K video up to 30p, 4K up to 30p
  • 1080 up to 120p
  • Leica L-Log profile
  • Zebras and False Color exposure displays
  • 230GB of internal memory
  • 10Gbps USB-C port, external mic compatible

The Sigma BF is available in Black or Silver at a cost of $2000. Sigma has also made versions of all its i-series primes to match the silver version of the camera.

Index:


What is it?

Sigma BF rear controls

The Sigma BF is explicitly not trying to be a do-everything, Swiss Army Knife of a camera. Sony’s a7C II already exists, bringing an EVF, multiple dials, a mechanical second-curtain shutter mechanism and in-body image stabilization, for a list price just 10% higher than the BF’s.

But if Sigma was trying to go head-to-head with Sony in the mass market, it probably wouldn’t be spending seven hours milling each camera out of blocks of aluminium, nor doing so in Japan: neither of which is the approach you take if you’re primarily driven to hit a specific price point.

Similarly, just looking at the specs, the BF might be mistaken for an unstabilized Panasonic S9 in a fancier body, but despite sharing a sensor, the two cameras couldn’t be more different.

Instead Sigma explicitly says the BF is designed for ‘everyday’ photography. An elegant object designed to be carried with you, rather than a utilitarian device you take when you’re taking photos. It’s absolutely not optimized for rapid operation, it’s not teeming with clever features. Instead it includes only the bare essentials for photography (or, arguably, slightly less than that, given its lack of mechanical shutter).

Sigma BF with notebook

Think of it like a Moleskine notebook: in many respects it’s not as practical for taking notes and recording ideas as the smartphone you’re already carrying, but the very process of carrying it with you acts as a prompt to look at the world and capture the thoughts you were having. The BF is trying to do the same.

It’s the difference between a camera that you’d grab when you want to go and take photos of something, vs a tool that encourages you to look for things to photograph.


Body and controls

Sigma BF top plate

User interface

The best way to understand the BF is to note the dedicated settings display towards the top right-hand corner on the back of the camera. This displays one of ten parameters:

Drive mode File format Aspect ratio Focus mode White balance
Shutter speed Aperture value Exp comp. ISO Color mode

These are also the ten parameters that appear on the main screen if you press the center button on the back of the camera, in the pattern shown in the table above.

You can navigate between them by pressing the cardinal points on the rear dial, then scroll the dial to change the current setting.

Sigma BF settings display
Pressing the center button lets you see and edit the camera’s core ten parameters, but the chosen setting is also shown in the dedicated settings display to the top right of the screen.

In this instance the aperture value is shown in dark grey because it’s being controlled from the lens.

But you don’t have to press the center button and bring them up on the main screen: once you’ve learned their relative positions (and chances are it’s the ones in the bottom row you’ll change regularly), you can navigate around them just using the settings display. And, for me, that’s the key to understanding the BF: it’s designed so that the core settings can be adjusted without looking at the main screen. You can set the camera to show all the settings on the main screen,

In keeping with this idea, the touchscreen is almost solely used for positioning the AF point or selecting a subject to track: even if you summon-up the settings on the main screen, you can’t tap to change settings, just choose what to focus on.

Exposure modes

The BF has no mode dial, so exposure mode is set by selecting which parameters you want to be controlled by the camera. This is done via the main screen. Press the center button to bring up the settings then press it again to edit them, and the ISO, aperture value and shutter speed indicators show ‘Auto’ options above them, letting you engage and disengage automated control of each parameter.

Any of the exposure parameters that can’t be changed by spinning the dial, either because they’re set to Auto or because aperture value is being set by an aperture ring, is rendered in darker grey, both in the settings display and on the main screen display.

Other settings

Sigma BF other settings display
Ten further settings, including the level gauge and options to display information such as focal length and focus distance are accessed via the three-dot button. Navigating down to the word ‘System’ takes you to the menu where fundamental settings such as date and time are edited.

Another ten settings, six of which relate to how much detail appears on the main screen (exposure parameters, guides, virtual horizon, etc), can be accessed by pressing the ‘three dots’ settings button. At the bottom of this settings menu is the word ‘System’ which gives you access to a ten-option-long list of fundamental camera settings, including firmware information, copyright information, menu language and date/time.

That’s the extent of the BF’s interface: ten top-level parameters, ten settings and ten menu options. But what this doesn’t fully convey is the degree to which it’s a camera in which Shutter speed, Aperture value, Exposure compensation and ISO can all be set using just the settings display, leaving the monitor solely for focus and composition.

Handling

Sigma BF at a diagonal

The BF is a very solid-feeling camera, as you might expect from something hewn from a solid block of metal. The body itself is relatively light but the weight adds up as soon as you mount a lens of any appreciable size on it.

Despite it’s minimalist appearance, it’s quite easy to hold. The textured front-plate and raised thumb rest at the back mean you can get a pretty solid grip on the camera, and you can cradle the weight of the lens in your left hand if you’re working with anything larger than one of the compact primes offered by Sigma or Panasonic.

However, we found that it was common for our ring finger to wrap around to the base of the camera as we held it, which quickly makes apparent how sharply angled the edge of the BF is. It’s not hard to imagine users adding a little tape to the lower edge of the camera or being tempted to chamfer the edge with a fine file, once they come to live with the camera.

I’ve primarily used it with the Sigma 35mm F2 prime and the Panasonic 20-60mm F3.5-5.6 lenses, both of which are small and light enough that it’s been comfortable to use.

Battery

Sigma BF with BP-81 battery

The BF uses a new 11.88Wh BP-81 battery. This will power the camera to a CIPA rating of 260 shots per charge. As always, the CIPA figure will tend to under-represent how many shots you’re likely to get, and we found it’s the camera’s propensity to show its charge percentage on its settings display that caused us to worry a little disproportionately.

Still, a rating of 260 is pretty low and means you may want to consider carrying a power bank if you plan to do more than occasional shots each day. Putting it on to charge overnight, just as you might do with your phone will probably be sufficient for everyday casual use, though.

A gentle press of the power button puts the camera into standby mode, but the battery will continue to drain at an appreciable rate. The BF starts up from cold quickly enough that this is usually a better approach.


Initial impressions

By Richard Butler

Sigma BF with lens cap
Even the body cap is an over-engineered delight.

The Sigma BF is one of the most unusual cameras we’ve ever encountered. On paper it looks like an under-specced rival to the Panasonic DC-S9 or even the Sony a7C II. Or, perhaps even a slightly re-purposed Sigma fp. But, even though it shares components and a small rectangular body, the BF is quite unlike any of these cameras.

Sigma’s CEO, Kazuto Yamaki talked about completely re-thinking the camera’s interface to pare it back to the fundamental things a camera needs to offer, in an attempt to make it simple to use, with the aim of making a camera for everyday use. And the more I use the BF, the more I think I understand this intent.

The idea of a dedicated settings display, leaving the main screen as a means of composing your image and positioning the focus point is a refreshingly simple one, undermined only by the challenge of viewing a fixed LCD in bright light. The decision to display only one setting, rather than a full array of settings and icons makes it very quick to interpret and I did find it made me consider what changes I wanted to make, shot-to-shot, in a way I don’t on a more conventional twin-dial camera.

Sigma BF full playback info
Playback mode has three levels of information that can be displayed, this is the most detailed, but you can also opt just to see the top two rows of information, or just the first.

Touching, rather than pressing, the playback button lets you review the last image you shot, without entering the full playback mode, for as long as your finger remains on the button.

This really hit home when I realized I prefer to set aperture from the camera, rather than using an aperture ring; I think the camera works best with everything controlled from the settings display, rather than trying to increase the number of control points.

Another surprise was how good the BF’s autofocus appears to be. Its subject tracking is very simple to use and impressively tenacious, while its eye detection works well and can be left turned on without minimal risk of the camera prioritizing nearby faces ahead of a different subject you’ve selected.

There are distinct downsides, though. The lack of mechanical shutter not only means there’s a risk of rolling shutter and that the camera can’t be used with flash, it also means it’s quite prone to banding caused by the inherent flicker of artificial lights. This can be fairly subtle at longer shutter speeds but becomes increasingly apparent in short exposures, limiting its use as an indoor camera, despite a sensor that works well in low light.

BF 00250
Sigma 35mm F2.0 | F4.0 | 1/500 sec | ISO 400

Photo: Richard Butler

Sigma’s sometimes quite dramatic color modes may not be to everyone’s tastes, and I’m not wholly convinced by the ‘Light Source Priority’ auto white balance mode, that tries to maintain some of the character of the detected light source. But even when the results are unexpected, they’re often interesting.

The BF’s battery life is also quite short. An external charger is available, if you want to keep a second battery topped-up, but mainly it’s a case of remembering to put the camera on to charge regularly, just as you might for your smartphone.

Other than a slight concern about the sharp lower front edge, I’m really looking forward to spending more time with the BF. It’s not a camera that lets you respond quickly to the unexpected; instead it’s one that makes you slow down and look for the photos you might otherwise not notice.

Sigma BF sample gallery

Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending