Connect with us

Camera

DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?

Published

on

DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?


The Air 3 (left) and the Mini 4 Pro (right) were released months apart in 2023. They share many similarities and a few differences. Which one is right for you?

Photo: Kara Murphy

Drones have been accessible to the general public for about a decade and continue to grow in popularity. They’ve become a valuable tool for videographers and photographers alike, providing unique vantage points that otherwise would have required renting a helicopter. With Skydio and Autel recently announcing a departure from the consumer drone market, DJI has emerged as the leader in this particular niche.


Buy the DJI Mini 4 Pro:



Buy the DJI Air 3:


DJI’s Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are ushering in a new era of safer, more reliable flying. Both models offer 360º omnidirectional obstacle detection, superior connectivity between the remote and drone with DJI’s OcuSync 4 (O4) transmission technology, and a variety of automated features that make capturing polished and professional-looking imagery feasible – all at a relatively affordable price.

The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro have updated gimbal clamps that protect the wide-angle fisheye cameras on the front of their bodies.

Photo: Kara Murphy

These drones have a lot in common, but they each have specific features that make them more suitable for certain people, depending on budget. We’ll explore what the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro offer and see which is the best option for most drone pilots. Is it worth investing in one of these newer models? Let’s find out.

By the numbers: DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro

The Air 3 is larger, heavier, and costs more than the sub-250g Mini 4 Pro. [A sub-250g does not need to be registered with the FAA in the US or with analogous agencies in many other countries, as long as it’s being used for recreational purposes.] This will make any Mini or sub-250g drone more appealing for some folks as Remote ID becomes effective in March 2024.

Weighing 720g, the Air 3 is heavier and will fare much better in high winds and other elements than the lightweight Mini 4 Pro. If you are in urban areas where wind tunnels form between buildings or if you fly your drone along the coast near large bodies of water, a lightweight drone is not your best option. And, yes, due to its weight, you’ll need to register it to comply with Remote ID.

DJI Air 3 Mini 4 Pro
Price $1,099 with RC-N2

$1,349 Fly More Combo with RC-N2

$1,549 Fly More Combo with RC 2

$759 with RC-N2

$959 with RC 2

$1,099 Fly More Combo with RC 2

$1,159 Fly More Combo Plus with RC 2

Camera Dual-camera system

Type 1/1.3 sensor

12MP (AEB 3/5/7) or 48MP (AEB 3/5)

F2.8 (fixed), 70mm, F1.7 (fixed)

Type 1/1.3 sensor, F1.7 (fixed)

12MP (AEB 5/7, 2X zoom)

48MP (AEB 3)

Digital Zoom Wide-Angle Camera: 1-3x
Medium Tele Camera: 3-9x

4K/60p

1-3x, up to 4K/60p
4x, up to 1080p/60p
Max Video Resolution 4K/60p, 150 Mbps 4K/60p, 150 Mbps
Video Transmission OcuSync 4.0 (O4), 20 km OcuSync 4.0 (O4), 20 km
Log Video 10-bit D-Log M 10-bit D-Log M
Intelligent Flight Features Waypoints

Cruise Control

FocusTrack

MasterShots

QuickShots

Waypoints

Cruise Control

FocusTrack,

ActiveTrack 360º

MasterShots

QuickShots

Obstacle Detection and Avoidance Omnidirectional, 360º Omnidirectional, 360º
Flight Time 46 minutes 34 minutes/45 minutes*
Dimensions 207×100.5×91.1 mm (8.15×3.96×3.59 in) 148×94×64 mm (5.83×3.7×2.52 in)
Weight 720g 249g
Vertical Shooting 2.7K/60p True Vertical, 4K/60p

*45-minute flight time requires a heavier battery, increasing the Mini 4 Pro’s weight to >250g.

The Mini 4 Pro is the first DJI drone to offer ActiveTrack 360º, which allows you to follow a subject from any angle, in any direction, including the front. The Air 3 will not allow you to track a car or person from the front.

The Mini 4 Pro also allows for True Vertical Shooting, meaning the camera’s entire sensor is used without cropping in any FocusTrack mode or while recording video at up to 4K/60p. This also applies to still images. Vertical shooting is available on the Air 3, but only at a maximum resolution of 2.7K/30p as of this writing. Since this camera does not rotate, the image is cropped.

DJI Air 3 vs Mini 4 Pro: Battery life and runtime

DJI made the front legs of the Mini 4 Pro longer. This makes launching and landing much easier than the Mini 3 Pro.

Photo: Kara Murphy

The Air 3 has brand-new, larger-capacity batteries that snap into the back of the drone. At up to 46 minutes of battery life, the Air 3 has the same flight time as the much more expensive Mavic 3 series.

If you use a standard Intelligent Flight battery on the Mini 4 Pro, you’ll get up to 34 minutes of flight time. The Intelligent Flight Plus batteries give you up to 45 minutes. However, using the bigger Plus battery will place the Mini 4 Pro’s weight above 250g, and you’ll need to register it before flying.

Both the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro have charging consoles that secure the batteries when charging. Because you can’t see how much a Mini battery is charged, the console will display the remaining amount of power for each one. As a bonus, the Air 3’s console is designed to allocate all the power from the other two batteries to one so you can take a full flight.

DJI Air 3 vs Mini 4 Pro: Remote compatibility

The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are compatible with the RC-N2 and RC 2 remote controllers. These are your only remote options since there’s no backward compatibility with older models. Both remotes have DJI’s O4 technology, which gives the drones a 20-kilometer (12.4-mile) range. While you never would fly that far beyond visual line of sight, this robust transmission can help deliver uninterrupted connectivity and a 1080p/60p low-latency stream to your remote’s screen.

DJI’s RC 2 remote looks similar to the original DJI RC. The difference is the antennas included for superior transmission between the drone and its remote.

Photo: Kara Murphy

DJI Air 3 vs Mini 4 Pro: Cameras

The Air 3 is the first in its series to offer a dual-camera system and support native vertical (9:16) shooting. The bottom main camera has a 24mm equiv. fixed F1.7 wide-angle lens and 82º FOV. On top is a 70mm medium telephoto camera (giving you the equivalent of 3X optical zoom from the main camera) with a fixed F2.8 aperture with a 35º FOV. Both cameras use Type 1/1.3 CMOS sensors that support 12MP pixel-binned and 48MP full-resolution photos.

The Mini 4 Pro has a single camera with the same Type 1/1.3 CMOS sensor, 24mm equiv. focal length and fixed F1.7 aperture as the Mini 3 Pro. Instead of relying on a separate telephoto lens, you can crop in up to 2x digitally when shooting 12MP photos, which does result in a hit to image quality.

The Air 3 is the first in its series to offer a dual-camera system.

Photo: Kara Murphy

The Air 3 allows for 4K/60p video recording and 4K/100p for slow-motion clips, all of which can be captured using DJI’s D-Log M color profile for more flexible post-processing. The Air 3 also includes Night Mode, introduced with the Mavic 3 series; this feature allows you to record up to 4K/30p video at an ISO up to 12800. D-Log M (10-bit) is not supported, however.

The Mini 4 Pro can also record up to 4K/60p video and Slo-Mo 4K/100p footage. The Mini 4 Pro has D-Log M, too; however, as with the Air 3, it’s unavailable while shooting in Night Mode.

Intelligent Flight Modes

Both the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro offer QuickShots – Dronie, Circle, Helix, Rocket, Asteroid, and Boomerang. MasterShots – which performs a series of QuickShots and stitches them all together in the DJI Fly app – is available on both models. FocusTrack, which allows you to select a subject, typically a car or person, and follow it using Point of Interest, ActiveTrack, or Spotlight, is also included.

The Mini 4 Pro is the first DJI drone to introduce ActiveTrack 360º. Building on the original ActiveTrack, this iteration allows you to track a subject from all angles. While the Air 3 allows you to track your subject from the sides or behind, the Mini 4 Pro can also track from the front. A large trace wheel will appear at the bottom left-hand corner of your remote’s screen, and you can use your finger to create a custom path for the drone to fly around the subject.

The Mini 4 Pro introduced the ActiveTrack 360º feature. You can draw a path with your finger, and the drone will automatically follow that same course around your tracked subject.

Screenshot: Pilot Institute

What makes either the Mini 4 Pro or the Air 3 a worthwhile investment, however, is the inclusion of the Waypoints Flight feature. This feature allows you to set a predetermined flight path by customizing various parameters for each waypoint, including altitude, speed, and the camera’s orientation so that you can repeat a shot multiple times. The drone will then fly the course automatically in the order you designated or in reverse.

On the Air 3 and more advanced drones, including the Mavic 3 series, you’ll get more information in your app’s interface, including how long the drone takes to complete its course. On the Mini 4 Pro, you get sparse information and will know how long your pre-planned course will take when it starts. All missions can be saved and repeated.

DJI squeezed an auxiliary light onto the Mini 4 Pro while keeping it under 250g. It will activate when you launch and land the drone at night or in low-light conditions.

Photo: Kara Murphy

Another feature available on both drones is Cruise Control. You need to set either the ‘C1’ or ‘C2’ button in the Fly app to activate it. You’ll fly at a certain speed, and as soon as you hit the designated button, your drone will fly at a consistent speed. This is useful for longer flights and allows you to focus on camera maneuvers, altitude, and other effects.

I already own a Mini 3 Pro or Air 2S. Is it worth the upgrade?

The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are both significant upgrades from their predecessors. The Air 3 performs much better in flight, especially in higher winds, has obstacle avoidance in all directions, the Waypoints Flight feature, and far superior battery life. The Air 2S camera has a 20MP, 1-inch CMOS sensor. While the Air 3’s Type 1/1.3 camera can produce 48MP images, it uses a quad-bayer sensor and can sometimes produce less refined results.

Starting with the Mini 3 Pro (right) and now the Air 3 (left), DJI has significantly improved the design and functionality of its battery charging consoles.

Photo: Kara Murphy

The Mini 4 Pro’s camera uses the same Type 1/1.3 sensor as the Mini 3 Pro, and both are capable of True Vertical Shooting. Where this model shines is, once again, omnidirectional avoidance, Waypoints Flight, and the new Active Track 360º feature that can track a subject from every angle. It’s worth noting that if you’re like me and ever accidentally flew into a tree due to a lack of sensors on the side, having obstacle detection on every possible side is extremely helpful.

“The Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are both major upgrades from their predecessors.”

Now that we’ve established that the Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are, in fact, significant upgrades, we also need to talk about why they may only be for some. Even though they are more budget-friendly than the Mavic 3 series, they still need to be purchased with a new remote. If you already have a DJI RC or RC-N1 controller that you’re using with another drone, the Mini 3 Pro or Air 2S are more economically friendly choices. Ultimately, it comes down to what you’re willing to spend and what features you’re most excited about.

Which one is best for you?

Let’s try to answer this article’s underlying question: Which DJI drone, released in 2023, is right for you? I’ve flown both extensively and came to the following conclusions.

The Air 3

the Air 3 is ideal for photographers and videographers looking to shoot at different focal lengths and fly at higher altitudes or along coastlines where wind speeds pick up.

The Air 3’s body is 470g heavier than the Mini 4 Pro. That added weight makes it ready to scale tall buildings or mountainous areas. Plus, you get more advanced video and photo features – the maximum 8-second shutter speed can create cool light trail effects or enhance lower-light settings, for instance. The added flight time and extra camera can both be very nice to have, too.

Even though the Mini 4 Pro has omnidirectional obstacle detection and avoidance, it is still susceptible to colliding with small twigs or power wires. Same with the Air 3 or any other DJI drone. A prop cage, pictured, is a great tool for preserving the drone if it crashes or runs into a wall.

Photo: DJI

The Mini 4 Pro

The Mini 4 Pro is ideal for two types of remote pilots: the casual flyer or the professional remote pilot needing additional perks. As we covered in our extensive article on the forthcoming Remote ID ruling, any drone weighing less than 250g at takeoff does not need to be registered with the FAA – so long as it’s flown recreationally. That means you get some of DJI’s best features at your disposal without needing to register it with the FAA.

“The Air 3 is ideal for those looking to shoot at different focal lengths and fly at higher altitudes or along coastlines where wind speeds pick up.”

What I appreciate about the Mini 4 Pro or any Mini-series drone is that DJI has constructed a light prop guard cage that makes operating indoors a breeze. Whether you have the Mini 4 Pro, with omnidirectional obstacle detection and avoidance, or one of the original models with no sensors, the cage, in most cases, will cause the drone to bounce off a wall or object and keep moving.

The Air 3’s (right) build resembles the more advanced Mavic 3 (left). Both drones will likely hold up better in higher altitudes and windy conditions than smaller DJI models, such as the Air 2S and Mini series.

Photo: Kara Murphy

I taught my daughter to fly in our house, and we practiced during the winter when it was too cold to operate outside. It should be noted that the FAA’s airspace regulations do not apply indoors. A tiny, lightweight drone like the Mini 4 Pro is perfect for this use case.

“The Mini 4 Pro is ideal for two types of remote pilots: the casual flyer or the professional remote pilot who needs some additional perks.”

Ultimately, you’d want a Mini 4 Pro for affordable access to cool features such as ActiveTrack 360º and True Vertical shooting – this model is highly versatile thanks to its lengthy feature list. Although it’s less capable outdoors and has weaker imaging specs, you do get a lot for your money with this model. Ultimately, there are some distinct differences between the Air and Mini models, and you’ll need to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of both based on what you’re hoping to do with a drone.


Buy the DJI Mini 4 Pro:



Buy the DJI Air 3:




Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850

Published

on

By

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

As part of our twenty fifth anniversary, we’re looking back at some of the most significant cameras launched and reviewed during that period. Today’s pick was launched seven years ago today* and yet we’re only quite recently stepping out of its shadow.

The Nikon D850 is likely to be remembered as the high watermark of DSLR technology. We may yet still see impressive developments from Ricoh in the future (we’d love to see a significantly upgraded Pentax K-1 III), but the D850 was perhaps the green flash as the sun set on the DSLR as the dominant technology in the market.

Click here to read our Nikon D850 review

Why do we think it was such a big deal? Because it got just about everything right. Its 45MP sensor brought dual conversion gain to high pixel count sensors, meaning excellent dynamic range at base ISO and lower noise at high ISOs. Its autofocus system was one of the best we’ve ever seen on a DSLR: easy to use and highly dependable, with a good level of coverage. And then there was a body and user interface honed by years of iterative refinement, that made it easy to get the most out of the camera.

None of this is meant as a slight towards the other late-period DSLRs but the likes of Canon’s EOS 5DS and 5DSR didn’t present quite such a complete package of AF tracking, daylight DR and low-light quality as the Nikon did. With its ability to shoot at up to 9fps (if you used the optional battery grip), the D850 started to chip away at the idea that high megapixel cameras were specialized landscape and studio tools that would struggle with movement or less-than-perfect lighting. And that’s without even considering its 4K video capabilities.

In the seven years since the D850 was launched, mirrorless cameras have eclipsed most areas in which DSLRs once held the advantage. For example, the Z8 can shoot faster, autofocus more with more accuracy and precision, across a wider area of the frame and do so while shooting at much faster rates.

But, even though it outshines the D850 in most regards, the Z8 is still based around what we believe is a (significant) evolution of the same sensor, and its reputation still looms large enough for Nikon to explicitly market the Z8 as its “true successor.”

Nikon D850 sample gallery

Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

*Actually seven years ago yesterday: we had to delay this article for a day to focus on the publishing the Z6III studio scene: the latest cameras taking precedence over our anniversary content.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear

Published

on

By

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Photo: Richard Butler

We’ve just received a production Nikon Z6III and took it into our studio immediately to get a sense for how the sensor really performs.

Dynamic range tests have already been conducted, but these only give a limited insight into the image quality as a whole. As expected, our Exposure Latitude test – which mimics the effect of reducing exposure to capture a bright sunrise or sunset, then making use of the deep shadows – shows a difference if you use the very deepest shadows, just as the numerical DR tests imply.

Likewise, our ISO Invariance test shows there’s more of a benefit to be had from applying more amplification by raising the ISO setting to overcome the read noise, than there was in the Z6 II. This means there’s a bigger improvement when you move up to the higher gain step of the dual conversion gain sensor but, as with the Z6 II, little more to be gained beyond that.

These are pushing at the extreme of the sensor’s performance though. For most everyday photography, you don’t use the deepest shadows of the Raw files, so differences in read noise between sensors don’t play much of a role. In most of the tones of an image, sensor size plays a huge role, along with any (pretty rare) differences in light capturing efficiency.

Image Comparison
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

As expected, the standard exposures look identical to those of the Z6 II. There are similar (or better) levels of detail at low ISO, in both JPEG and Raw. At higher ISO, the Z6III still looks essentially the same as the Z6II. Its fractionally higher level of read noise finally comes back to have an impact at very, very high ISO settings.

Overall, then, there is a read noise price to be paid for the camera’s faster sensor, in a way that slightly blunts the ultimate flexibility of the Raw files at low ISO and that results in fractionally more noise at ultra-high ISOs. But we suspect most people will more than happily pay this small price in return for a big boost in performance.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Canon EOS R5 II for video: what you need to know

Published

on

By

Canon EOS R5 II for video: what you need to know


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Canon EOS R5 II as a video tool

The Canon EOS R5 II isn’t just a new version of the company’s popular R5 mirrorless camera; it’s the spiritual successor to the EOS 5D series of ‘affordable’ full-frame digital cameras. That includes the EOS 5D Mark II, the world’s first Full HD video-capable DSLR, a model that reset the market’s expectations for video capabilities on ‘photography’ cameras, and which, according to several Canon insiders we’ve talked to over the years, gave Canon the confidence to expand more aggressively into the digital cinema market.

Many of the R5 II’s headline-grabbing specs have centered around the camera’s photo capabilities, but it shouldn’t be a surprise that the EOS R5 II is for filmmakers as much as it is for stills shooters. In the following slides, we’ll examine what the camera offers to movie shooters.

Video specs

The EOS R5 II includes a wide variety of resolutions and frame rates to support just about any level of video quality. At its highest quality, the camera can capture DCI-style 8K Raw video internally at frame rates up to 60p. The R5 II also features a new 4K ‘SRaw’ recording option, with frame rates up to 60p. Canon hasn’t disclosed whether this 4K is downsampled from 8K or subsampled on the sensor, but it’s something we’ll test for our full review.

When shooting compressed video, the camera can capture 8K, 4K, and even Full HD resolutions in either DCI (1.89:1) or UHD (16:9) aspect ratios, using either the full width of the sensor or a very slight crop (1.05x). This includes 8K up to 30p, subsampled 4K up to 120p, and subsampled FHD up to 240p. It’s also possible to capture 4K and FHD resolutions in both DCI and UHD ratios using a cropped APS-C region of the sensor.

Finally, when connected to an external recorder via HDMI, the camera can also output 8K Raw at up to 30p or 4K Raw at up to 60p, both in a 1.89:1 aspect ratio. We’d be very surprised if this can’t be encoded as ProRes RAW once Atomos has had some time with the camera.

Codecs

The R5 II includes multiple codecs to support its myriad video options. When recording Raw video, the camera provides the option to record in either Canon’s Raw or Raw Light format. Video captured at frame rates of 50p or higher uses the Raw Light format to keep file sizes in check. Of course, there’s also the aforementioned SRaw option for 4K Raw video.

In an effort to better align its newest mirrorless cameras with its Cinema EOS product line, the R5 II features Canon’s XF-HEVC S and XF-AVC S compressed video formats, both of which can capture 4:2:2 10-bit color. The XF-HEVC S format, based on the H.265 codec, also allows you to capture 4:2:0 8- or 10-bit video, whereas XF-AVC S, based on the older H.264 codec, offers a 4:2:0 8-bit option.

The R5 II also includes the ability to capture HDR video by simultaneously capturing normal and underexposed frames, combining them to better preserve highlights in high-contrast scenes. This can be combined with the camera’s PQ picture profile for use on compatible TVs or displays.

Rolling shutter

One of the most significant upgrades in the EOS R5 II is the addition of a Stacked CMOS sensor, which promises to improve the camera’s rolling shutter performance (though it isn’t nearly as fast as the one in Canon’s new flagship mirrorless camera, the R1).

We measured the R5 II’s rolling shutter rate when shooting DCI 8K video at ∼12.6ms. That’s not going to set any records, but it’s faster than the 15.4ms we measured for the same resolution on the original R5, which should make rolling shutter artifacts less noticeable on the newer model.

Most Stacked sensor cameras don’t capture video using the super-fast multi-line readout modes they use for stills, so they’re not as impressively fast. A sub-15ms rolling shutter rate is extremely good, though, so you’d have to really provoke it to see any rolling shutter distortion.

C-Log2

The EOS R5 II will be the first Canon mirrorless camera to hit the market with Canon’s C-Log2 gamma profile. According to Canon, this is part of its effort to better align video capabilities and workflows across its product line.

C-Log2 encodes a wider dynamic range than the C-Log3 gamma profile included on some previous Canon mirrorless bodies and will better replicate and match footage from Canon’s cinema cameras. However, C-Log3 remains available for use in less challenging situations where the extra dynamic range of the C-Log2 curve isn’t required, retaining more data per stop of light.

Overheating

The original R5 received criticism for its propensity to overheat, particularly when shooting 8K video. The R5 II can also experience thermal issues at its most demanding resolutions and frame rates, but Canon has introduced a new accessory grip with a built-in cooling fan, the CF-R20EP, to help mitigate this issue. It joins manufacturers like Panasonic and Fujifilm that have provided accessory cooling fans for video-focused mirrorless cameras.

According to Canon, when capturing 8K/30p video, the R5 II should run for up to 26 minutes or up to 37 minutes with the camera’s auto power-off temperature set to high (based on an unused camera starting in an environment of 23ºC/73ºF). With the accessory fan attached, these times should increase to 106 minutes or 120 minutes (or more). When capturing 4K/60p footage, Canon claims the accessory fan will allow recording without time restrictions.

The CF-R20EP has a suggested retail price of $400. It also includes an ethernet port for fast connectivity or remote operation.

Dual recording

The R5 II includes a new dual recording feature that allows you to capture high-resolution JPEG images while recording video. Using this feature, the camera can capture Full HD video at up to 30p on one card while capturing UHD 8K (7620 x 4230 resolution) JPEG images at up to 7.5fps on the other.

This feature does have limitations. You’ll likely need to optimize your shutter speed for either photos or video, as the camera uses the same setting for both media. Also, some camera functions, such as focus breathing correction, chromatic aberration correction, diffraction correction, and in-camera image upscaling, will not work in this mode. Dual recording requires the new LP-E6P battery that can provide more sustained power.

Video tools

Although the R5 II has some very impressive video specs, we’re equally excited to see Canon include helpful tools to better support the user experience of capturing video. To start, Canon has finally added a waveform display to one of its mirrorless bodies, allowing video shooters to judge exposure across the frame when shooting video more accurately. Similarly, Canon has also added a false color display, which makes it easier to visualize exposure values in an image or to quickly dial in the correct exposure for a particular part of an image, like skin tones.

On the hardware side, the R5 II now includes a full-sized HDMI port, an improvement over the mini-HDMI port on its predecessor. It also has a front tally light to let subjects know when you’re recording. It includes 3.5mm headphone and microphone jacks.

Finally, Canon has also added the ability to pre-capture either three or five seconds of video, which should help in situations where it’s difficult to anticipate when the action will start.

Multi-function hot shoe and digital/4-channel recording

The EOS R5 II also gains Canon’s multi-function hot shoe, which includes communication pins for compatibility with accessories beyond speedlights. The original R5 didn’t include this feature, though it appeared subsequently on the EOS R3.

The main benefit of the multi-function shoe for video shooters is support for digital audio input, as well as 4-channel audio support.

Summary

The original EOS R5 came to be known as a capable video camera, able to deliver stunning video quality, once the initial concern about overheating had cooled. The R5 II goes the next step to address some of the challenges encountered by its predecessor, such as providing an add-on fan to improve thermal management, refining the workflow experience through the addition of tools like waveforms, false color and better hardware connections, and through enhanced capabilities, like the addition of C-Log2 and dual recording.

The result is a camera that promises to perform very well for both stills and video and could potentially integrate pretty seamlessly as a B-cam on a production using Cinema EOS equipment. If you’re a serious video shooter or even an enthusiast just looking to experiment and expand your horizons, the R5 has a lot of potential. We’ll see how it stands up to real-world use once we receive a production copy, and look forward to testing the autofocus to see how well the experience on the stills side of the camera translates to video.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending