Camera
The need for (transfer) speed: Five full-featured Thunderbolt 3 docks compared

Intro
There’s no shortage of Thunderbolt dock options on the market. We took a look at five different units and compared them by price, features, and speed. |
The new Apple M1 Mac Mini has a lot going for it: it’s an amazing machine in a small form factor. Unfortunately, in what seems to be a continuing Apple trend, it has lost a couple of Thunderbolt ports over the previous version. Enter the Thunderbolt dock: a must-have solution for a lot of photographers and videographers looking to connect multiple high-speed drives and/or other peripherals to machines with minimal connection points.
In this article, we’ll compare five popular Thunderbolt 3 Docks based on price, features, and speed to crown a winner. All of the docks in this comparison are capable of connecting to fast drives via USB-C and most offer built-in high-speed SD card readers as well as additional connectivity for various peripherals.
All of the docks in this comparison are capable of connecting to fast drives via USB-C and most offer built-in high-speed SD card readers as well as additional connectivity for various peripherals
Below you can see how these five docks stack up, on paper:
Price | Power delivery over Thunderbolt | USB-C ports
(10Gb/s) |
USB-A ports
(10Gb/s) |
Thunderbolt pass though | USB-A ports
(5Gb/s) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
StarTech TB3DK2DPM2 | $330 | 85w | 1 | 0 | Yes | 2 |
Hyperdrive GEN2 16-Port | $300 | 85w | 2 | 2 | Yes | 3 |
Plugable TBT3-UDC3 | $219 | 96w | 2 | 1 | No | 2 |
Corsair TBT100 | $250 | 85w | 2 | 0 | No | 2 |
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock | $250 | 85w | 1 | 0 | Yes | 5 |
Note: Manufacturer availability was a factor in the docks we included. If your favorite Thunderbolt dock is not represented here, please mention it in the comments. We’ll look to update this comparison in the not-too-distant future.
We’ll start first with an overview of each dock, including its design, features and included accessories, and we’ll follow up with a series of benchmarks where we pit all the docks against each other to see which drives excel in which areas.
StarTech TB3DK2DPM2
$330 | StarTech
![]() |
The StarTech hides its key feature on the bottom of the case. |
This StarTech dock has a single front-facing USB-A port running at 5Gb/s and a USB-C port running at 10Gb/s. There’s also a UHS-II SD Card slot and separate microphone and headphone sockets. At the back is where you find the upstream and downstream Thunderbolt connections as well as a Gigabit Ethernet jack, a second 5Gb/s USB-A socket, and finally a DisplayPort connector. Included in the box is a 17-inch Thunderbolt 3 cable.
This dock is the only product here that offers the ability to insert an SSD into the enclosure
One thing that you notice right away is the size of the included power supply, which is larger than the dock itself. This is due to the power delivery requirements needed for attached devices so that a single cable hookup can be used for charging your laptop and the data connection.
This dock is the only product here that offers the ability to insert an SSD into the enclosure (specifically, an M2 80mm NVME drive) for integrated storage. StarTech says the enclosure supports transfer speeds up to 1.5GB/s, but your mileage may vary. Note: it will not work with the SATA variant as the internal slot is not compatible.
![]() |
Some NVME drives may prove a tight fit, especially if they are double-sided. |
On to a small issue, the compartment’s lid already has a rather thick thermal pad attached. I found this interfered with the fit of my drive as supplied and you may find a similar issue if your drive has a heat spreader already attached. The XPG drive I used was double-sided, but the lid closed properly after removing the pad.
![]() |
Upstream and downstream Thunderbolt ports are handy for adding fast SSDs. |
All in all, I had no issues with the StarTech dock, although it can get warm in use, especially if you’re using an NVME drive in the internal enclosure. But overall, it offers a nice mix of speed and connectivity.
What we liked
- Ability to add internal SSD storage to the dock
- Separate headphone and microphone sockets
What we didn’t like
Hyperdrive GEN2 16-Port
$300 | Hyperdrive
![]() |
Monolithic in design; the Hyperdrive takes up less desk space and includes a wide selection of ports. |
The second dock I looked at is the diminutive unit from Hyperdrive. This small and dense unit with its solid all-metal construction has dual digital as well as analog audio ports, which is unusual. It also has full-size and micro SD slots supporting UHS-II cards.
If direct digital audio is important to you then the Hyperdrive has both Coax and Toslink connections.
It supports 10Gb/s speeds via dual front-facing USB-A ports in addition to a USB-C port. It also has the usual single 3.5mm socket with headset support. Additionally, there’s a front-mounted USB-A port that supports power delivery standard for charging devices (but it has no data capability). At the back are the two Thunderbolt ports and connection points for Gigabit Ethernet, a DisplayPort connection, and another 3 USB-A ports with 5Gb/s speeds. If direct digital audio is important to you then the Hyperdrive has both Coax and Toslink connections.
There’s a small power LED on the front of the unit which can be difficult to see in bright lighting. The included Thunderbolt cable is 17 inches long. As is the case with any of these docks, you might find the length of the included cable quite short, but this is to keep to the advertised speeds. Longer aftermarket active Thunderbolt cables are available, but these cost more and are available in copper or optical versions.
![]() |
Digital audio is not something you often find on most Thunderbolt docks. This combined with twin Thunderbolt connections and a lot of USB sockets makes this dock extremely flexible. |
I should mention that the SD card sockets on this dock are inverted from the norm, so if you want to put this horizontally on your desk, you need to insert your cards with the label face-down or flip the whole unit.
This dock is designed primarily for vertical orientation and while there’s nothing to stop that from happening, I found it to be a bit unstable in practice. The design would be better if a stand or rubber feet were supplied to stop it from slipping on a desk.
What we liked
- Well-built, small footprint (when used vertically)
- Large number of connections including three at 10Gb/s
- Dedicated front-facing USB-A charging port
- Digital and analog audio ports
What we didn’t like
- Limited stability in a vertical position
Plugable TBT3-UDC3
$219 | Plugable
![]() |
A budget option, but it’s missing more than a high price tag. |
The Plugable is the most affordable dock we looked at and also one of the smallest. It ships with a longer cable than most of the docks here (28.5 inches) and also includes an active DisplayPort to HDMI adaptor in the box. Considering the cost of these items by themselves, this might be a deal clincher. However, it does lack a second Thunderbolt port for daisy-chaining devices.
The Plugable is the most affordable dock we looked at and also one of the smallest
This is another unit with three 10Gb/s ports, all around-back, including two USB-C and one USB-A. It also has both DisplayPort and HDMI sockets, although on an M1 Mac you can’t use both at the same time.
As usual, you also get a Gigabit Ethernet support and a 3.5mm headset socket as well as two more 5Gb/s USB-A ports on the front. It’s also has a large LED power indicator on top and a side-mounted Kensington lock slot.
![]() |
You get a total of three 10Gb/s USB Ports on the Plugable. |
With the smaller than usual volume, you have to sacrifice something and with this dock, and we’ve lost the ability to use SD cards; there’s also no second Thunderbolt socket. Then again, it’s all about balancing requirements with form factor and cost.
What we liked
- Included cable options
- Three 10Gb/s USB Ports
- Price and size
What we didn’t like
- No SD Card slot
- No Thunderbolt passthrough
- Glossy black front and back panel are prone to show scratches
Corsair TBT100
$250 | Corsair
![]() |
Corsair’s offering is the only one here to include a power button. |
The next dock comes from one of the heavy hitters in the PC space, Corsair. There’s a certain visual appeal to this dock with its rounded edges, matt grey and black finish, and low profile design. Corsair has decided to include a power button and like the Plugable dock, you also get a longer-than-normal 25-inch Thunderbolt 3 cable.
This dock offers a lot of versatility, as long as you don’t need a second Thunderbolt port or front-facing USB-A connectivity
This dock offers a front-facing USB-C socket, an SD card slot (with UHS-II support), and a headset port. At the rear your find a single Thunderbolt port, twin HDMIs, and two USB-A (5Gb/s) ports. There’s also a USB-C port as well as the usual Gigabit Ethernet jack, as well as a Kensington lock slot.
Initially, I had some disappointing results when testing read/write speeds for the SD card reader. For some reason, the speeds were well below what should have been possible. This was rectified by power cycling the dock.
![]() |
There’s no Thunderbolt pass-through here, but you do get a second 10Gb/s USB-C port on the back. |
This dock offers a lot of versatility, as long as you don’t need a second Thunderbolt port or front-facing USB-A connectivity. It’s also one of the more elegant designs.
What we liked
- Appealing design
- Length of included cable
What we didn’t like
- No front-facing USB-A port
- No Thunderbolt pass-through
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock
$250 | OWC Digital
![]() |
While the OWC might give you everything you would need in terms of connections, the black plastic top is prone to showing scratches and fingerprints. |
This offering from OWC gives you five USB 3.1 Gen1 ports, four on the back and one on the front. Two of these support high power devices (1.5A) and a 17-inch Thunderbolt cable is included in the box. Like a couple of other docks here you also get a Thunderbolt pass-through connection around the back as well as the usual Gigabit Ethernet socket.
This dock gives you just about everything you want in terms of connections. That said we’d happily give up one of the many 5Gb/s USB-A ports for the faster version
As with the Hyperdrive, it also gives you digital audio out, although this time it’s optical only and you do get the usual headset output on the front. It’s the only dock in this article that connects via mini DisplayPort for the video output and there’s no dongle in the box. You also get both a UHS-II SD and micro SD card slot at the front. Additionally, on the underside are two LEDs (green and blue) indicating host Thunderbolt connection and power status.
![]() |
The OWC offers a Thunderbolt pass-through socket and a Mini DisplayPort socket to connect your monitor. |
When testing the font USB-C port I was slightly surprised to find that it was quite a bit slower than the other docks on test here. This is because this socket uses a dedicated PCI-e Gen 3 x 1 lane. In practice, this means that while you only get about 8Gb/s it’s not throttled by any other port when in use. From a design point of view, I was a little disappointed to see that the top and bottom are both pieces of glossy black plastic that tend to show up fingerprints and scratches long term.
This dock gives you just about everything you want in terms of connections. That said I’d happily give up one of the 5Gb/s USB-A ports for the faster version, although it does offer a couple of advantages over the similarly priced Corsair dock.
What we liked
- Good selection of ports
- Optical digital audio out
- Value for money
What we didn’t like
- Glossy top and bottom panel
- Mini DisplayPort output
Speed test
Thunderbolt and NVME speeds in these tests are with an ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB. For USB-C testing it was placed in a Sabrent Tool-Less USB-C enclosure and for Thunderbolt speeds, the same drive was placed in an Orico Thunderbolt enclosure. A 32GB SanDisk Extreme Pro UHS-II SD card was used to test the card reader speeds.
Tests were conducted using the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test app, the file size was set to 5GB and results were averaged over 5 runs.
UHS-II read | UHS-II write | TB read | TB write | NVME write | NVME read |
USB-C read | USB-C write |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
StarTech TB3DK2DPM2 | 244 | 186 | 1405 | 956 | 1356 | 1073 | 723 | 654 |
Hyperdrive GEN2 16-Port | 265 | 231 | 1409 | 973 | n/a | n/a | 930 | 903 |
Plugable TBT3-UDC3 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 928 | 922 |
Corsair TBT100 | 256 | 211 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 945 | 929 |
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock | 255 | 205 | 1375 | 1043 | n/a | n/a | 764 | 694 |
*All speeds recorded in MB/s.
The Hyperdrive dock offers the fastest UHS-II read and write speeds of the bunch, but not by a huge margin. Similarly, those docks with Thunderbolt connections all delivered similar read and write speeds, with the OWC dock being just a bit faster than the competition. In terms of USB-C speeds, the Corsair dock came out on top (again, not by much), with the Plugable and Hyperdrive docks following close behind.
Conclusion
After working with each of these for a while, I chose the Hyperdrive for long-term use. The balance of good transfer speeds, the number of ports, and the small footprint led me to choose it as my daily driver.
![]() |
However, just because this is the best dock for me doesn’t mean it will work best for you. You need to work out what’s best for your particular workflow. Do you need to connect up a lot of kit? How fast do the ports need to be? And if you’re using these with a laptop, do they pass through enough power for charging your battery?
I chose the Hyperdrive for long-term use. The balance of good transfer speeds, the number of ports, and the small footprint lead me to choose it as my daily driver
The Plugable is the only one here with 96W support for charging and the StarTech is the only one with an NVME drive slot built-in. If you need digital audio then the Hyperdrive ticks that box and has faster UHS-II speeds as well. The Corsair gives very good UHS-II speeds and also has two 10Gb/s USB-C ports. The OWC gives you a good balance of the number and type of ports and is a great value.
Of course, you could always combine more than one if your budget allows. And things are about to get more complicated with the introduction of Thunderbolt 4.
Camera
Accessory Roundup: A wireless mic, vintage-inspired iPhone case, and more

Images: Godox, Shure and Fotogear |
Happy Saturday, everyone! We’ve made it to the weekend, so it’s time to look at some new accessories that came out this week. Today’s roundup includes a battery pack for lights, a vintage-inspired smartphone case and a new mic. But first, let’s check out what’s on sale.
The sales
![]() |
Photo: Dale Baskin |
Canon’s powerful and versatile R6 Mark II is currently on sale for $200 off. We reviewed it two years ago, and although the camera is due for a refresh, it’s still a very worthy piece of equipment, especially at this price.
![]() |
Image: Fujifilm |
For something a bit more fun (and affordable), the Fujifilm Instax Mini 12 is currently at its lowest price since the holidays. The Instax Mini 12 brought some worthwhile improvements over its predecessor, making it easier to get keepers with this fun little instant camera.
Buy now:
Easier audio
![]() |
Photo: Shure |
Shure’s latest microphone, the MoveMic 88+, features direct-to-phone stereo microphone technology, making it faster to get to recording. Its Bluetooth connection offers a range of up to 100 feet, and there’s no extra dongle or recorder necessary. It even offers four polar patterns to help you record a variety of situations.
Turn your iPhone into a vintage camera
![]() |
Image: Fotogear |
iPhoneographers who want something a bit more special to house their phone may appreciate the Fotogear Retro DMF Photography Kit. It’s a multi-part case that looks like a vintage camera while adding control dials and a shutter to make your phone function more like a camera, too. It’s compatible with the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max and comes in a few different configurations. The case is available for pre-order now through Fotogear’s website.
More power
![]() |
Image: Godox |
The Godox BG02 Battery Grip is a powerful tool for photographers and videographers who use Godox lights on the go. The grip features a 95Wh capacity battery that is airline-friendly, extending the life of your lights when on location. It’s compatible with the AD200, AD200Pro, AD200Pro II, AD300Pro flashes, ML100Bi, ML100R and FH series LED lights. You can pre-order it now through B&H.
Back-button focus
Finally, this week’s educational video comes from Adorama’s YouTube series Ask David Bergman. In it, Bergman discusses back-button focus, how to set it up and whether it’s still worthwhile with the advanced subject detection autofocus modes on new mirrorless cameras.
Camera
New Pen not yet on the drawing board, says OM System

OM System’s Director of Product Planning, Hiroki Koyama and VP for Brand Strategy and Product Planning, Kazuhiro Togashi, at CP+ 2025
Photo: Dale Baskin |
“We are considering the new Pen concept as OM System brand,” says OM System’s Kazuhiro Togashi, VP for Brand Strategy and Product Planning.
We spoke at the CP+ trade show in Yokohama, Japan, and he reassured us that the arrival of the OM-3 with a Pen-F style ‘creative dial’ on the front doesn’t close the door on the rangefinder-style series.
“There’s a different concept between OM-3 and Pen-F series,” he explains: “basically the Pen-F series is about ultimate beauty and the ultimate craftsmanship. Whereas OM-3’s core concept is to take authentic and great creative photos.”
But, he says, it’s too soon to know what a future Pen might look like. “We think the camera’s design must realize the concept of the product, so we don’t start to decide the camera design before deciding the camera’s concept: the product concept must come first.”
“Therefore, we haven’t yet decided if the product design for a new Pen will look like the Pen-F or similar to the E-P7 because we haven’t decided on the product concept.”
But what’s clear is that OM System does plan to continue the Pen line.
The continued appeal of dedicated cameras
We asked Togashi what he thought makes shooting with a dedicated camera special, in a time when smartphone image quality has got so good.
“Experience is very important,” he says: “There’s a different kind of experience between smartphones and a camera. For example, I personally love to use a smartphone, but just to record; without any emotional feeling.”
“When a user decides the moment with their camera, maybe their feelings are being moved by such an attempt: they’re not just recording, there’s more to it.”
“It’s like with professional sportsmen. They have to prepare to give their best performance during the game. They are always training before the game.”
“When you get a perfect photo, you feel a win”
“In the case of photos, photo enthusiasts always think or calculate before taking a photograph. Before you take something, you consider the place, or you think about which position is better, or what sort of atmosphere or angle: you calculate before you take the photo.”
“This is like a serious game, just as it is for football or baseball player. And when you get a perfect photo, you feel a win. ‘I win, by myself’ I don’t know if many people can get that similar experience by taking photos with a smartphone.”
And he thinks this difference should remain, even as the image quality gap narrows. “Smartphone’s development speed is very high, and in the future, the difference between smartphones and camera might become very small,” he says: “however the difference in experience, is a bit bigger.”
We’re not the company to make an enthusiast compact
Despite this, and in spite of rising sales of compacts, Togashi says we shouldn’t expect an enthusiast compact.
“As for the current popularity of compact digital cameras, lower-priced models seem to be selling very well worldwide, but we feel that this is a temporary trend.” he says: “We are continuing to study the development of a successor to the TG series, but currently we don’t have any plans to introduce other compact camera concepts.”
“We don’t have any plans to introduce other compact camera concepts”
“As for high-end compact digital cameras, we recognize that there is a dedicated user base that remains a valued segment of the market, however, at OM System, we are focused on developing products that align with the evolving needs of photographers, ensuring we deliver the best possible innovation and performance across our lineup.”
“When we were Olympus, our brand was known for high-end compact cameras like the XZ series and Stylus 1. However, since becoming OM System, we no longer carry high-end compact cameras. Instead, we focus on cameras that align with broader market needs, including those of younger generation photographers. Given the significant investment required – not only in research and development but also in reestablishing a high-end compact brand image – such a product would be challenging to make profitable.”
The TG series endures…
![]() |
The TG series of rugged, waterproof cameras continues to have an audience, the company says.
Image: OM System |
But the TG series definitely has a future, says Togashi, because it has a dedicated user base.
“TG still survives and is well received by the market,” he says: “Outdoor enthusiasts want to capture their activities and adventures. Also families look for ways to preserve special memories—whether it’s their children playing in the pool or on vacations and situations like that.”
“On the other hand, professional scuba divers or climbers continue to rely on the TG series. For them, safety is very important during these extreme activities, and the TG series remains a trusted tool in these challenging environments. “
“Both types of users continue to use the TG series, setting it apart from other high-end compact cameras. Their main priorities are mobility and ease of operation, rather than smartphone connectivity. They love the operation and mobility.”
…but a high-end TG would be challenging
These specific requirements might rule out a higher-end TG, he suggests
“We’re always talking about the successor of the TG series and whether to add a new, higher TG line, maybe using a bigger sensor, or perhaps a TG-DSLR.”
“We’re always thinking about the possibilities. However, as of today we don’t have any best answer to realize this concept because the requirement for TG series is very hard. For example, making a large or removable lens drop resistant is very difficult.”
Also, he says, keeping the size down is important: “if we adopted a bigger sensor and we maintain the same optical zoom range, the body would need to be very big. That means such a TG would lose the mobility concept.”
Togashi didn’t seem enthused by our suggestion of a prime lens: “A lot of TG users’ photographic needs are different from enthusiasts’, so they like to use a zoom lens. They like to enlarge subjects in their photos, therefore they always use tele-zoom.”
Director of Product Planning, Hiroki Koyama raises another concern: ” We also give priority for close-up capability. TG can be used very close to the subject. If we choose a bigger sensor size, the close-up capability will be reduced. The current sensor size is the best balance, but we’ll try to study the concept.”
The OM System lens range
On the subject of lenses, we asked whether they believe the current Micro Four Thirds lens lineup includes all the options an OM-3 user might want.
“Still not yet,” says Togashi: “We are also trying to develop small and light and bright lenses or something like that. We have space to make new lenses in the future. I can’t disclose [the details], but yes.”
Choosing the right lenses to add isn’t always easy, he suggests: “People always ask ‘will you make a pancake lens?’,” he says: “but then the pancake lens sales are not so good in general. But still, we’ll continue to consider it.”
Interview conducted by Dale Baskin and Richard Butler, answers edited for flow.
Camera
Tips for taking epic shots of tonight’s ‘blood moon’ total lunar eclipse

A lunar eclipse, captured by Jamie Malcolm-Brown in November 2021. Used with permission. |
Editor’s note: This article was originally published in 2022. We have updated it with information about the current eclipse as a service to readers.
Starting tonight, March 13, through the early hours of tomorrow, March 14th, skywatchers in the Americas will be able to view the first total lunar eclipse of the year. The moon will turn a ‘blood red’ hue for a brief period as it passes entirely into the Earth’s shadow when lined up with the sun. Depending on where you are located, there is a specific time you can witness this phenomenon.
Time and Date, a top-ranking site for times and timezones, created a useful tool that allows you to make a plan by entering your viewing location. From there, it gives you pertinent information, including the total duration, what time each phase of the eclipse starts and the direction it’ll travel, plus altitude during these phases. A helpful animation gives you a visual of how it will appear, minute by minute, once it starts.
![]() |
Time and Date created a free tool to help you plan your total lunar eclipse viewing, depending on your location. This is the data for Seattle, WA, where DPReview’s headquarters is located. |
If you plan on bringing your camera out for the ‘blood moon’, photographer Jamie Malcolm-Brown has some helpful tips for camera settings. Describing his process for capturing a lunar eclipse in 2021, he tells DPReview that ‘it was taken with [a] 200-600mm lens at 600mm, ISO 800, F6.3, at 1/3 sec. I bracketed the shots at 5 shots with an EV (exposure value) change of 1. Next time I would probably bracket 5 shots but with only an EV change of .3. The final image was cropped fairly significantly to fill the frame with the moon.’
While useful for capturing more detail on the moon’s surface, you don’t necessarily need a long lens that extends to 600mm to photograph the blood moon. John Weatherby released a quick, helpful tutorial on Instagram outlining his process for getting the best images possible. For one, you can shoot at a focal length between 100–200mm if you want to include a foreground.
View this post on Instagram
Weatherby also explains that having a sturdy tripod and ball head is an absolute necessity. Ensuring that the lens is locked in securely will yield clearer images of the moon. Using the camera’s shutter delay or self-timer, or an external remote, will also help prevent blurry shots as the camera is likely to shake a bit once you press the shutter. PhotoPills, an app that helps you identify where the moon will travel in accordance with your specific location, is recommended as well.
It’s important to check the weather in your area as cloud coverage can potentially conceal the moon completely. Windy.com is a free app available on desktop, iOS and Android that, in my opinion, does a decent job of forecasting weather patterns. It’ll give you a visual of where clouds will appear at specific dates and times so you can determine the best place to set up in your state or country.
![]() |
Windy.com, a free app, is an effective tool for forecasting weather elements, including cloud coverage. |
The next total lunar eclipse will take place on September 7, and will be visible in parts of Asia, Africa and Australia. If skywatching interests you, you’re in or near one of the locations where the eclipse is visible and weather permits, I recommend getting out for a few hours and witnessing this wonderful event first-hand.
-
Solar Energy3 years ago
DLR testing the use of molten salt in a solar power plant in Portugal
-
TOP SCEINCE7 months ago
Searching old stem cells that stay young forever
-
Camera1 year ago
DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?
-
Indian Defense4 years ago
Israeli Radar Company Signs MoU To Cooperate With India’s Alpha Design Technologies
-
Camera1 year ago
Sony a9 III: what you need to know
-
world news1 year ago
Gulf, France aid Gaza, Russia evacuates citizens
-
world news5 months ago
Sirens trigger across central Israel following rocket barrage targeting Tel Aviv Iron Dome battery
-
world news5 months ago
Hezbollah’s gold mine catches fire: Nasrallah’s bunker under hospital held half billion dollars