French camera maker Pixii has announced the Pixii Max, a 24MP full-frame rangefinder camera that accepts Leica M-mount lenses.

The Pixii Max (Model A3410) is the company’s fifth camera and the first to move from an APS-C sensor to full frame. Like the previous, 26MP A2572+ and A2572 models, the Max uses a fully 64-bit processing pipeline, allowing fine-precision manipulation of the sensor’s 14-bit output.

Also like its predecessors, the camera’s true rangefinder viewfinder has framelines projected into it (35mm in this instance), meaning they can correct for parallax as you focus to closer distances. The outer limits of the finder represent a 28mm angle of view. The camera’s core exposure settings are also projected into the viewfinder.

Photo: Pixii

It also has a mono option that takes into account the relative perceptual lightness of its sensor’s Red, Green and Blue filters, to create a monochrome DNG Raw file. This should give the sharpness benefit of not having to demosaic the results, but won’t gain the ∼1EV improvement at any given ISO that completely removing the filter array would bring.

The Pixii Max is available for pre-order from July 5th at a cost of €3999, without taxes (approx $4325 at current exchange rates) for the version with 32GB of internal memory or €4249 (∼$4595). As before, the company says there are options to upgrade previous models to the latest specifications. We’ve asked the company for more details of this upgrade path.

Results published by Bill Claff and forum regular Horshack both point to the Nikon Z6 III having appreciably lower dynamic range than the previous generation of 24MP sensors.

Faster sensor readout is often associated with higher levels of read noise, and this appears to be the case with what Nikon is calling the “Partially Stacked” sensor in the Z6III. Bill Claff’s photons to photos site reports a maximum dynamic range of 10.4EV, using his own “photographic DR” metric. This compares to a figure of 11.3EV for the Z6 II.

It’s important to stress that dynamic range is not the same thing as image quality: two cameras can demonstrate the same dynamic range cut-off even while one exhibits much better tonal quality across much of the brightness range of its images. So it’s not safe to make assumptions about the Z6III’s overall image quality in relation to other cameras’ DR numbers.

However, after a long period in which most cameras showed extremely low levels of read noise, allowing the deep shadows of images to be brightened and incorporated into images, it’s definitely noteworthy that the Z6III will have noisier shadows than its predecessor and the Nikon Zf. The trade-off for this reduction in shadow performance is the high-speed shooting modes, the improved rolling shutter in both video and e-shutter stills, and any AF performance advantage shown over the Zf.

The Z6III’s sensor has a dual conversion gain design, and the higher gain step is sufficient to overcome the read noise difference seen at lower ISOs, bringing the Z6III back into line with the Z6 II, but it’s the peak dynamic range figures (typically for base ISO) that are most meaningful.

We have not yet received a testable camera so cannot corroborate the results, but the findings of lower dynamic range by experienced and knowledgeable users makes us feel confident enough to report them. We’ll be testing the Z6 III and showing how photographically meaningful these differences are or aren’t, as soon as we receive a camera.