Camera
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 II review
Almost six years after the announcement of the Lumix DC-G9, Panasonic rolled out its successor, the Lumix DC-G9 II. This is the company’s high-end model aimed at stills shooters, and it is the first-ever Lumix Micro Four Thirds camera to include phase detection autofocus. Despite its target demographic, the G9 II comes with a surprisingly long list of video features as well. A thorough redesign, the G9 II is based on the chassis of the full-frame Lumix S5 II and S5 IIX, giving it room for plentiful controls and ports.
Key specifications
- 25MP CMOS sensor with dual output gain
- 5-axis in-body image stabilization (CIPA-rated to 8 stops)
- On-sensor phase detection (779 points)
- 3″, 1.84M-dot fully articulating touchscreen
- 3.86M-dot OLED electronic viewfinder with 0.8x magnification
- 60 fps burst shooting with AF-C and electronic shutter (10 fps mechanical)
- 100MP handheld high-res mode
- Up to 5.8K Open Gate 4:2:0, C4K 4:2:2 10-bit, with V-Log and HLG
- ProRes 422 and 422 HQ recording to SSD
- Raw output to Atomos and Blackmagic external recorders
- 390 shots per charge battery life (using LCD)
- USB-C power delivery
- Dual UHS-II card slots
The G9 II is priced at $1899 body-only: a $200 increase from its predecessor.
Buy now:
|
What’s new
The Lumix G9 II is a departure from the original G9 design in a few key ways. |
Rather than a refresh of the original DSLR-like Lumix G9 concept, the G9 II goes in a more modern direction. Not only does it take technological advancements from the full-frame Lumix S lineup, it has the same external design as the S5 II announced earlier in the year. It’s taller, more squared off, and has more controls than its predecessor. It isn’t just a similar design – it’s literally the same outer shell, but without fan vents and with a different lens mount and sensor inside.
Hybrid autofocus and DR Boost improvements
The G9 II is based around a sensor related to the one in the GH6, but that Panasonic says has been revised at both the hardware and software levels. The most obvious difference is that the version in the G9 II has phase-detection elements that make it the first Micro Four Thirds Lumix model to offer inherently depth-aware autofocus.
The other change that will make a big difference is the way the dual output gain system works. Panasonic describes it as having two parallel readout paths that are subjected to differing levels of gain, which are then combined. This way, you get the highlight capture benefits of low gain and the cleaner shadow performance of high gain paths, combined as a 16-bit Raw file to ensure room to encode this widened dynamic range.
The sensor in the G9 II is derived from the one in the GH6 but with some key improvements, both in hardware and software. |
For the G9 II, Panasonic appears to have reduced the lowest step offered by the high-gain path. Whereas on the GH6, the high gain (shadow) path was only used at ISO settings three stops above base (ie, ISO 800 in standard color modes, ISO 2000 in V-Log mode), on the G9 II, Panasonic says it’s available from base ISO upwards, suggesting the high gain step can be dropped further, to make it available at these lower ISOs.
However, it’s worth noting that the GH6’s base ISOs were 100 for standard color modes and 250 for V-Log, but for the G9 II, they’re 100 and 500, respectively. The one-stop jump in base ISO in V-Log mode seems to suggest a high-gain path applying one stop more gain than the low path in its base state (rather than the 3-stop difference required for DR Boost on the GH6). This doesn’t explain how Panasonic can offer a mode that includes a high-gain component while maintaining the same ISO 100 rating for standard gamma, and it’s interesing to note that when you exceed 60fps (where the Dual Output mode can’t operate) that the minimum ISO in V-Log drops to 250, suggesting this might still be the true ‘base’ state.
More video than you’d expect
Unlike the G9, which gained a lot of video features after launch, the G9 II throws in everything but the kitchen sink right from Day 1. Panasonic swears this is a camera for still shooters, but the number of video resolutions and features accounted for – including V-Log, open gate 5.8K, and ProRes support – sure make it feel almost as hybrid as the GH6 or S5 IIX. It retains the full-size HDMI port of the S5 II series and can even record directly to a USB-C SSD.
Although not marketed as a hybrid model, the G9 II has a ton of features that make it interesting for hybrid shooters and those curious about video. |
With its improved autofocus, why would anyone buy a GH6 over the G9 II? Rest assured that CFexpress card support and the built-in fan let the GH6 retain its hybrid crown for now. Panasonic says that G9 II shooters should think of this camera more as a B-cam than a primary run-and-gun setup and that the lack of a fan might become an issue when shooting high-res video in hot environments.
Improved IBIS
The smaller Four Thirds-type sensor is cushioned from jostles by an aggressive 8-stop CIPA-rated in-body image stabilization system. Panasonic says that the SyncIS system, where the sensor and lens stabilization systems work together, is only rated for 7.5 stops and that they’re reaching the physical limits of the lens-based optical stabilization systems at this point. There is a benefit though: the synchronization between the body and lens’ IS systems allows the camera to maintain 7.5 stops of correction at longer focal lengths where the in-body system alone could not.
High-resolution mode
The improved IBIS also enables the G9 II’s 100MP handheld high-res mode. Although the higher resolution of this mode means it’s a little slower to stitch its photos together, the more sophisticated algorithm Panasonic uses does a good job of reducing subject motion.
There are two motion blur processing modes; mode 1 doesn’t attempt it at all, and mode 2 does.
Handheld 100MP | ISO 100 | 1/250 sec | F5.6 | Leica DG 12-60mm F2.8-4 @ 38mm equiv. Photo: Jeff Keller |
The scene above is bustling, and you can see how well the G9 handled motion in this 100 Megapixel photo. A few people have extra feet, but otherwise, motion is handled very well.
While we’re on the subject of high resolution, here’s a real-world example of tripod mode. You’ll find an additional example in our studio scene further down the page.
Subject detection improvements
Panasonic’s older depth-from-defocus AF system lagged behind the competition somewhat, but the G9 II looks to address that. With the addition of distance-aware phase-detection, the G9 II also brings some new subject detection and tracking algorithms.
There are a number of subject types in the AF menu, including animals (mainly pets, but also can track birds), one for cars (targeting motorsports photography), and another for motorcycles (which they say may work for bicycles, depending on the angle of the subject). Like the G9 II’s improved human detection, the animal mode has eye detection as an additional option.
Cropped to taste. Shot in full area AF mode with animal tracking and continuous focus. ISO 125 | 1/400 sec | F4 | Leica DG 50-200mm @ 384mm equiv. Photo: Jeff Keller |
Live Composite
Once a feature exclusive to Olympus cameras, Live Composite made its way to Panasonic’s mirrorless lineup in 2020. This is essentially a multi-exposure mode where objects that do not change brightness are left alone during each shot. All you need to do is set the exposure time you want and the delay before shooting starts, then press the shutter release. The camera will silently take photos until you press the button again.
Converted from Raw using ACR. Exposure slightly brightened. Shot in Live Composite mode. ISO 400 | 8 sec per exposure | F3.5 | Leica DG 8-18mm F2.8-4 @ 20mm equiv. Photo: Jeff Keller |
How the Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 II compares to its peers
The new Panasonic Lumix G9 II comes in at a high price, befitting a flagship model (at least, as Panasonic’s G-series flagship for stills). Unfortunately, there’s a lot of competition in the ∼$2K high-performance camera category. While the newcomer significantly out-specs its predecessor, its stills rival in the Micro Four Thirds world: the OM System OM-1 Mark II, is lighter, has better battery life, and a higher-res EVF. It’s also quite a bit more expensive.
That’s not to mention the slew of fantastic APS-C cameras out there, and we’ve included the Fujifilm X-T5 and Sony a6700 as two of the best, both of which are cheaper than the Lumix.
Panasonic Lumix G9 II | Panasonic Lumix G9 | OM System OM-1 II | Sony a6700 | Fujifilm X-T5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $1899 | $1699 | $2399 | $1399 | $1699 |
Pixel count | 25.2MP | 20.2MP | 20.4MP | 26MP | 40MP |
Sensor size | Four Thirds (225mm²) |
Four Thirds (225mm²) |
Four Thirds (224mm²) |
APS-C (361mm²) |
APS-C (369mm²) |
Image stabilization | In-body + in-lens | In-body + in-lens | In-body + in-lens | In-body or in-lens | In-body or in-lens |
Max burst rate | 10 fps (mech shutter) 60 fps (elec shutter) |
9 fps (mech shutter) 20 fps (elec shutter) |
10 fps (mech shutter) 50 fps (elec shutter) |
11 fps (mech shutter) 11 fps (elec shutter) |
15 fps (mech shutter) 23 fps (elec shutter) |
Viewfinder res / mag | 3.68M dots / 0.8x |
3.68M dots / 0.83x | 5.76M dots / 0.83x | 2.36M dots / 0.70x | 3.69M dots / 0.8x |
Rear screen | 3.0″, 1.84M dot articulating touchscreen | 3.0″ 1.04M dot articulating touchscreen | 3.0″, 1.62M dot articulating touchscreen | 3.0″, 1.04M dot articulating touchscreen | 3.0″, 1.84M dot articulating touchscreen |
Video capabilities | Up to 5.8K/30p open-gate 4:2:0 10-bit | Up to C4K/30p 4:2:2 10-bit | Up to DCI 4K/60p 10-bit | Up to 4K/60p oversampled | Up to 6.2K/30p, 4K/60p sub-sampled |
Log video | V-Log, HLG | $100 V-Log firmware | OM-Log400, HLG | S-Log3, HLG | F-Log, F-Log 2, HLG |
Mic/ Headphone sockets | Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes |
Battery life (LCD) |
390 | 400 | 520 | 570 | 580 |
Card slot | 2x UHS II SD | 2x UHS II SD | 2x UHS II SD | 1x UHS II SD | 2x UHS II SD |
Weight (loaded) |
658g (23.21oz) | 658g (23.21oz) | 599g (21.13oz) | 493g (17.4oz) | 557g (19.6oz) |
On the whole, the G9 II is fairly competitive in the Micro Four Thirds system. But looking at the APS-C options out there (like the Sony A6700 and Fujifilm X-T5), the G9 II doesn’t appear to bring anything spectacular to the table, even if it is a noteworthy move forward for Panasonic’s G-series. That said, it’s alone here in being able to output video to an external SSD, if video is your thing.
Body and handling
Looking at it from the back, the Lumix G9 II offers up a new 8-way joystick and an improved autofocus selector. |
While the original G9 was far from compact, it certainly had a different design philosophy than its successor. Seemingly aimed at DSLR photographers, it was a wide camera with a big backlit top plate LCD. That camera also only had a single exposure mode dial (on the side opposite the grip), front and rear command dials, and a power switch that surrounded the shutter button.
The new G9 II, by comparison, feels more modern. Since it’s basically the same design as the Lumix DC-S5 II, this camera throws a ton of controls at the user. Make no mistake: this is a clean-sheet redesign, and if you were a big fan of the original, you might be disappointed that nothing has remained the same. That said, for everything you lose (like the top LCD, front Fn lever, and flash sync port), you gain a whole lot more (more ergonomic twin dials, a more prominent AF selector switch, a dedicated dial for continuous shooting, and an upgraded 8-way joystick).
The Lumix G9 II, unlike the very similar S5 II, lacks fan vents at the bottom of the EVF hump. |
And although the G9 II is taller and the grip a bit shallower, it still manages to feel plenty comfortable to hold, despite some of the rear controls being a bit clustered together. Overall, though, even though the weight is the same as the old model, this Micro Four Thirds body seems quite large for what it is.
Something that some found irritating on the original G9 was the overly sensitive shutter release button. Panasonic has addressed that on the G9 II with a firmer, less trigger-happy design.
What hasn’t improved a whole lot is the EVF, which is a 3680k dot (1280 x 960px) panel with a slight decrease in magnification at 0.8x. In use, it’s totally passable, and the magnification definitely makes up for the lack of sheer resolution. The rear articulating LCD, on the other hand, is a much higher resolution now at 1840k dots, making for a detailed, bright shooting experience even in direct sunlight.
The addition of a USB-C port and support for USB PD charging is a big step up from the original G9’s USB 3.0 Micro B socket. |
Like its cousin, the Lumix S5 II, the G9 II packs the ports we’d expect for a flagship camera in 2023. You get a full-size HDMI, fast USB-C PD charging (with 10Gbps transfer speeds and the ability to record stills and video to an external SSD), as well as mic and headphone sockets, the former of which is positioned out of the way of the screen hinge.
On the opposite side are 2 UHS-II speed SD card slots, which can be programmed to work in sequence or in parallel, backing up files on both for redundancy or filling the next card after the first one’s full. One benefit that’s worth mentioning is that since this is physically just about identical to the S5 II, many accessories will be compatible between the two models, including first-party accessories like the new DMW-BG1 battery grip and third-party add-ons like cages for video rigging.
The 2200mAh battery lets the G9 II shoot around 390 shots on a single charge. |
Inside the G9 II is the same DMW-BLK22 16Wh battery as we’ve seen in other big Lumix models. On the G9 II, however, you’re still only getting around 390 shots on a charge according to the CIPA method with either the LCD or EVF. That’s lower than other cameras in its class and certainly in its price range, trailing the OM System OM-1 Mark II by 130 shots and the Fujifilm X-T5 by 190.
This is despite Panasonic putting the camera in a deep sleep mode when it’s switched off, from which the camera takes 2-3 second to wake. Once awake, subsequent attempts to turn on the camera are quicker, but it’s worth being aware that you can’t just grab it from your bag and shoot.
Image quality
Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you’ll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes to see the effect of different lighting conditions.
The G9 II captures a decent amount of detail in its Raw files at base ISO, though the OM System OM-1 and Sony a6700 grab a smidge more. Moiré is well-controlled and competitive with most of its peers, save for the Sony a6700. At mid-ISOs the G9 II looks a lot like its peers, but from ISO 6400 upwards it falls increasingly behind.
Looking at JPEGs, the G9 II appears to use a bit more noise reduction than the other cameras in this comparison, which you can see in these brushes. Color in JPEGs are vibrant without being oversaturated. There’s very little noise at ISO 1600 thanks to Panasonic’s noise reduction system. At ISO 6400, the G9 II is more-or-less the same as its peers.
In situations where you can use the tripod-based pixel shift mode, the G9 II is able to offer resolution capture far beyond its peers. Our test shots are somewhat hampered by what we suspect is vibration in our testing studio, leaveing cross-hatched artifacts in places. This won’t always be the case, though it does give an insight into how steady your tripod and subject need to be to capture the very highest resolution.
Real-world photo quality makes one forget that the G9 II uses a smaller sensor than most of its peers. Whether it’s engraving in 19th-century buildings or the plumage on a short-ear owl, you’ll see plenty of detail in its JPEGs. As usual, shooting Raw and running it through Adobe Camera Raw or DxO PureRAW will give you the ability to fine-tune sharpening. You can also create a custom Photo Style was stronger sharpening.
Out-of-camera JPEG | Shadows/highlights adjusted in ACR |
The G9 II’s sensor allows you to boost shadows with a minimal increase in noise, as shown above, and in a few photos in the sample gallery.
Our DR tests bear this out, and highlight the improvement compared with the GH6. However Panasonic has been able to implement dual parallel gain at ISO 100, it works, with much cleaner shadows than its (even) more video-focused sibling. This means both the Raw files and the camera as a whole, are more flexible.
ISO Invariance | Exposure Latitude
Autofocus
Operating and adjusting autofocus isn’t much different than on the 7-year-old DC-G9 (or any Panasonic camera released since then). A switch lets you quickly switch between single, continuous and manual focus. Pressing the button in the center of the switch opens up the AF area menu, which offers the following options:
- Tracking
- Full area
- Zone (Horizontal/Vertical)
- Zone
- 1-area+
- 1-area
- Pinpoint
With the exception of pinpoint (which is well-suited for macro photography), all of the AF options let you turn subject detection on or off.
Adjusting the focus point can be done in a few ways. You can use the joystick, tap on the screen, or by using “Touchpad AF.” The latter is available when shooting through the viewfinder; to adjust the focus point, you move your finger on the LCD to adjust the focus point. There are a number of options for what area of the display is used for AF point movement. To switch between detected subjects, you can tap on the screen or use the joystick.
Cropped to taste. Shot in full area mode with animal tracking and continuous AF. Leica DG 50-200 @ 400mm | ISO 100 | 1/640 sec | F4 Photo: Jeff Keller |
Panasonic offers four options for subject detection: humans, animals, cars and motorcycles. For the first two options, you can select what you want the camera to lock onto: eye/face/body for humans and eye/body for animals.
The G9 II’s animal mode can detect people, birds, canines (domestic and wild) and felines (big and small). We tested it with all of them, and the camera detected them without issue. It was impressive when tracking owls and harriers in the Skagit Flats conservation area in the full area mode, even when they were flying away.
Customizing AF behavior
One of the four menus for customizing how the camera reacts to moving subjects in AF-C |
There are four sets of customizable parameters for continuous autofocus. Here, you can adjust AF sensitivity, AF Area switching sensitivity, and moving subject prediction. Set 1 is for general use, while the other three are for more specific situations. We found that choosing the most fitting option was the most effective.
For our test of continuous autofocus and its ability to judge distanct, we used Set 2, which is defined as “[when] the subject moves at a constant speed in one direction.” Face detection was disabled.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
The G9 II’s AF system did a nice job in this example. It took a few shots to lock on and then kept the cyclist in focus for the rest of the run, correctly anticipating subject distance and driving the lens accordingly.
Then we tested the camera’s ability to track a subject moving around the scene and approaching the camera at a less predictable speed. Here we switched to set 4 (“for situations where the speed of the subject changes significantly”). We then performed the test both with and without face detection.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
As we often see with cameras in this test, the G9 II struggled to keep the cyclist in focus during the turns, where the rate of approach suddenly changes. This was the case both with and without face detection engaged.
When we used face detection, when it started to lose focus, the camera was briefly tricked by the statues of firefighters in the background. Thankfully the G9 II quickly figured it out and locked back onto the correct subject.The G9 II can shoot at 60 fps with continuous AF (75 fps is only for single AF) and performed about the same as at slower speeds, complete with the brief distraction of the statues. These tests don’t represent all circumstances, of course, but suggest the G9 II’s AF, even when tuned to match the expected subject movement, is not as dependable as the best of its peers.
Video
For what Panasonic bills primarily as a stills camera, the G9 II has a surprisingly complete set of video features. And, as it often does, Panasonic has added more video features to the G9 II since it was announced via a firmware update.
The G9 II can capture “open gate” 5.8K video using the entire Four Thirds sensor using either HEVC. This gives 5760 x 4320 pixel 10-bit 4:2:0 footage at either 30 or 24 frames per second, giving flexibility to crop-in in post, or to take vertical and landscape crops from the same footage. At 5.7K the aspect ratio ships from 4:3 to 17:9 and the maximum frame rate jumps to 60p. At lower resolutions you can shoot 4:2:2 footage, and high-speed 120p capture also becomes available.
The list of video recording options is overwhelming, though you can narrow it down via filters and save your favorites to a custom menu. |
If you’re using Apple ProRes you get 4:2:2, 17:9 video up to 30p, or 16:9 Cinema 4K at 60p. If it’s Raw video output you’re after, the G9 II can send it over HDMI to select Atomos and Blackmagic external recorders.
The G9 II supports V-Log capture or the moderately flat Cinelike D2 photo styles if you intend to color grade during the editing process. It also supports HLG capture in most of its modes for direct use on HDR TVs.
The bit rates of the highest quality settings are so high (approaching 2Gbps in some of the ProRes 422 modes) that an SD card just can’t keep up, so you’ll have to use an SSD connected via USB-C.
Resolution | Frame rates | Aspect ratio | Crop | Bit depth/ chroma | Codec | Media type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.8K (5760 x 4320) |
4:3 open gate | 10-bit 4:2:0 | H.265 | SD / SSD | ||
5.7K (5728 x 3024) |
|
1.89:1 | 10-bit 4:2:0 | H.265 | SD / SSD | |
10-bit 4:2:2 | ProRes | SSD | ||||
4.4K (4096 x 2160) |
1.89:1 | 10-bit 4:2:0 | H.265 | SD / SSD | ||
DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) |
|
1.89:1 | 10-bit 4:2:0 | H.265 | SD / SSD | |
|
10-bit 4:2:2 | H.264 | ||||
ProRes | SSD | |||||
UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) |
|
16:9 | 10-bit 4:2:0 | H.265 | SD / SSD | |
|
10-bit 4:2:2 | H.264 | ||||
ProRes | SSD |
When 5.8K open-gate or UHD 4K is being captured, UHD 4K 4:2:2 is output over HDMI
When 5.7K or DCI 4K is being captured, DCI 4K 4:2:2 is output. 48p and 47.95p capture gives 24p or 23.98p HDMI out.
Scrolling through that list is overwhelming, but you can use Rec Quality (My List) feature. When you’ve found the resolution, frame rate, and bite rates that you lie, just press the Q button to get it to My List. You can then assign a button to access the list you’ve created, ensuring you only use one of your pre-selected modes.
Speaking of the Q button, there are separate Q Menus for both stills and video. By default, some settings are shared between still and video. Those include exposure, white balance, Photo Style, and metering and AF modes. You can break the link via the CreativeVideo Combined Set. option, found in the gear > image quality 2 section of the menu, to control which parameters do and don’t carry over.
Image stabilization
There are two “enhanced IS” electronic image stabilization modes that work on top of the camera’s sensor-shift IS system. This takes a small-to-medium crop of the frame and uses the surrounding area to compensate for camera movement. “Standard” enhanced IS adds a small 1.1x crop, while “High” adds a more substantial crop in exchange for its strong shake reduction.
Also worth being aware of is the “Boosts IS” function. This tells the camera that you’re try to keep your shot entirely still, and will fight against any movement you then make, rather than trying to anticipate which of your movements are intentional. We found it highly effective at maintaining an almost tripod-like stability.
Some other useful capture tools include waveforms and vectorscopes, shutter angle, V-Log/HLG view assist, anamorphic de-squeeze, preset distances for automatic rack focusing, and numerous audio controls.
At 4K (UHD), the G9 II looks nearly the same as the Sony a6700, which samples video from a 6K area of the frame. The a6700 is just a bit sharper, though you’re unlikely to notice in the real world. The same is true at both DCI 4K and 4K/120p settings. The results are similar looking at the high res 5.7K setting versus Panasonic’s GH6, with the smallest of difference in sharpness.
Sample video
Conclusion
By Jeff Keller
What we like | What we don’t |
---|---|
|
|
The Panasonic Lumix G9 II isn’t the camera one would’ve expected Panasonic to release based on its predecessor. The original G9 was a very good stills-focused camera with some video features thrown in for good measure. The G9 II builds on those features, puts them in the body of the full-frame S5, and adds video tools that get it pretty close to the GH6.
Converted from Raw using ACR. White balance adjusted. ISO 3200 | 1/60 sec | F3.8 | Leica DG 12-60mm F2.8-4 @ 68mm equiv. Photo: Jeff Keller |
The G9 was already a fairly large camera, especially for Micro Four Thirds, and the same is true with its successor. As one would expect, the body is weather-sealed, though Panasonic doesn’t provide an IP rating. Our G9 II did have a close encounter with a muddy photographer and kept on going after some cleanup.
If you’ve just picked up the G9 II, you might find the sheer number of dials and buttons to be imposing. The menu system is overloaded with options, so putting your favorites into the “My Menu” is a smart idea.
Another thing to be aware of is that the G9 II’s battery life is below that of its peers. If you use Bluetooth to geotag or auto-transfer your photos, it’ll drain even faster. Carrying around a spare battery or a power brick (with USB PD support) is a smart idea if you’re planning on a full day of shooting.
Cropped to taste. ISO 100 | 1/320 sec | F4 | Leica DG 50-200mm F2.8-4 @ 400mm equiv.
Photo: Jeff Keller |
The G9 II’s autofocus is generally pretty good and a significant step up from the G9, or any Panasonic camera that uses its Depth-from-Defocus system, for that matter. When attempting some bird photography, I was surprised by how reliably it detected them, locking onto and tracking them even when they were flying away from me. In that situation and some others we tested, the AF system may lose its subject, but it usually got it back.
The G9 II’s 25 Megapixel sensor has further closed the gap between Four Thirds and APS-C. Noise levels are somewhat higher than on the likes of the Sony a6700 and Fujifilm X-T5 and trail a little behind the OM-1. While it was difficult to push the shadows on the old G9 without a noticeable increase in noise, you can get away with it on the G9 II.
When the G9 II was released, Panasonic called it a “launching point for video.” The fact is that the G9 II is very close to Panasonic’s “official” Micro Four Thirds video camera, the GH6. The G9 II can do almost everything the GH6 can, bar the longer recording times and 5.7K/60p capture that the GH6’s fan-assisted design delivers.
ISO 100 | 1/125 sec | F3.2 | Leica DG 12-35mm F2.8 @ 52mm equiv.
Photo: Jeff Keller |
One video feature that really impressed me was Boost IS, which is designed for stationary shooting. It does that amazingly well, even eliminating the slight tremor in my hands. For more action-oriented footage, the more traditional electronic stabilization modes performed well, with a small-to-moderate crop depending on the intensity.
In conclusion, as someone who has shot with the original G9 for years, Panasonic’s G9 II is a significant upgrade in so many ways, from sensor to subject recognition to burst speeds. And it’s nice being able to carry a camera and lenses in a range of focal lengths in a relatively small bag. It’s not perfect: battery life is not great, the menus can be overwhelming, and it can be frustratingly slow to start up at times. This and AF tracking that’s only good, rather than great, are the only things that stop it gaining our Gold award. Overall the G9 II has proven to be a reliable stills camera with strong image quality and some useful computational modes, and can get you well on your way to being a videographer.
Scoring
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category. Click here to learn about what these numbers mean.
Compared to its peers
The OM System OM-1 Mark II is an excellent camera conceptually very similar to the G9 II. While both cameras have weather-sealed bodies, the OM-1 II is rated to the IP53 standard and we’d have no qualms about using it in the rain. The larger and higher-res EVF on the OM-1 II is nice, and its battery life is significantly better. The G9 II has more to offer serious videographers in terms of support tools, resolution, frame rates and codecs. And while the OM-1 can recognize more subjects, we think the G9 II’s AF tracking performance has a slight edge. Its price is also $500 below that of the Olympus, money that could be spent on lenses.
The Sony a6700’s rangefinder-style design is 180° from the G9 II. It’s smaller, with fewer, more cramped controls and an underwhelming EVF. Unlike the G9 II it has a single memory card slot and no AF joystick. It has many of the still and video specs of the Panasonic though it’s not to the extent of capturing uncropped 4K/120p or open gate footage. That said, the a6700’s autofocus tracking performance is probably the best on the market. Sony also has the magic touch when it comes to battery life, which is twice that of the G9 II.
Like the G9 II, the Fujifilm X-T5 appears to be stills-orientated, but with high res video capabilities. The truth is very different, with rolling shutter and significant cropping holding back the Fujifilm. The X-T5’s control logic is much more traditional than the G9 II’s, which some people will love, and it’s a similar story with the two-axis LCD. The X-T5 also has a high-res mode but it requires more shots, has no motion correction and needs to be combined off-camera. The AF systems are similar with good subject recognition sometimes held back by failure to predict distance correctly, leading to significantly missed shots.
Buy now:
Sample gallery
Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don’t abuse it.
Production gallery
Pre-production gallery
Camera
Our year in stories 2024: a look back at the year's news and reviews
The year is coming to a close, so we thought it would be a good time to go back through the archives and pick out some of the most important stories we covered and reviews we published throughout 2024. This list will be far from exhaustive – we have one of those if you’re interested – as we’re just looking at the highlights.
January
Canon EOS R100 Review
On January 22nd, we published our in-depth review of Canon’s EOS R100, the company’s entry-level mirrorless camera. We found that it compromises perhaps a bit too much to reach its $479 body-only price point but can produce some lovely-looking pictures nonetheless.
Sony ZV-1 Mark II Review
Hot on the heels of the EOS R100 review was our deep-dive on the Sony ZV-1 Mark II, a compact vlogging camera based around a Type 1 Stacked CMOS sensor. It has its strengths – though it’s absolutely not the enthusiast stills compact we’ve all been hoping for – but we found that it doesn’t quite do enough to earn a recommendation compared to a modern-day smartphone.
Also in January, we published our initial review of the Sony a9 III, the first full-frame photography camera from a major manufacturer to feature a ‘global’ shutter. We’ll talk about it more in a bit when we get to the full review. We also published our initial review of the OM System OM 1 Mark II, a mild update to the company’s Micro Four Thirds flagship. And who can forget CES?
February
February is usually a busy month here at DPReview thanks to the CP+ industry expo that takes place in Japan. That means we have to cover a lot of news, but we were also able to release our initial review of the Fujifilm X100VI, a camera that would go on to become one of the most difficult pieces of tech to get in 2024. We also published a sample gallery for the OM 1 Mk. II, and added the Panasonic S5 II to our studio scene.
Finishing the Nikon Zf review
While we published the bulk of our Nikon Zf review in early January, in February, we added a sample video and video experience section, rounding out the review. The Zf may look like a vintage film camera, but we found it was surprisingly capable of filming as well.
March
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 II Review
In March we published our full review of the Panasonic G9 II, a high-end Micro Four Thirds camera aimed at stills photographers. We found that it accomplished that task well, and was a worthy successor to its predecessor… while also packing a surprisingly capable suite of video features as well.
Leica SL3 Initial Review
We also took a look at the Leica SL3, a camera that takes the sensor used in the company’s flagship M11 rangefinder and put it into a more traditional mirrorless body with an L-mount and autofocus capabilities.
March was also a busy month for sample galleries; we published pictures shot with four different lenses and a selection of images from our trip to Japan in February, shot with the Panasonic S5 IIX. We also covered Nikon’s acquisition of cinema camera maker Red, and interviewed the Divisional Manager of Fujifilm’s Professional Imaging Group about the company’s future.
April
Panasonic S5 II Review
Our review of the S5 II was definitely late to the game, as the camera was unfortunately announced right as we were learning that DPReview’s parent company intended to shut it down. This year, however, we were finally able to put some time in with it, using the new v3 firmware that added several features and enhancements.
We also looked at pixel-shift high-resolution modes and explained why we’ve had such bad luck with them in the past. Spoiler: some of it comes down to patents and the real world’s inability to hold still for too long. Also in April: we asked manufacturers what they thought some of the most influential camera gear from the past 25 years was, checked in on Ricoh’s development of a new film camera, and Sigma’s CEO gave us an update on full-frame Foveon.
May
Fujifilm X100VI Review
In May, we published our full review of the Fujifilm X100VI, a fixed-lens camera that paired AI-derived autofocus and a stabilized sensor with an already-popular hybrid rangefinder / EVF. We found using it to be an extremely compelling experience, which is what makes it such a shame that it’s still only available on backorder or at extremely inflated prices all these months later.
Sony a9 III Review
We also finished our in-depth look at the Sony a9 III, and found that it was an incredibly capable sports camera. Its ‘global’ shutter makes different types of photography possible, especially when it comes to shooting with high-powered flashes. The tech does come with a small downside in image quality, but if you need to shoot some of the fastest subjects on earth, it’s likely worth the tradeoff.
We also took our first look at the Fujifilm X-T50 and its new kit lens, the XF16-50mm F2.8-4.8 R LM WR. May was apparently Fujifilm month here at DPReview, though we also published an interview with Sigma’s CEO, and a celebration of physical controls on cameras. Be sure not to miss our stunning sample gallery from the Sigma 15mm F1.4 either, or the first episode of our Stories Behind the Photo podcast.
June
Pentax 17 Review
It’s not often that we review film cameras. For one, our expertise is largely in digital photography – go figure – but more importantly, there just aren’t that many that come out. This year, though, Pentax released its first camera in 20 years that shoots to celluloid instead of a sensor. It’s definitely not cheap, despite the fact that it keeps film costs down by shooting half frames instead of full ones, but using it is a unique experience in this day and age.
We also took our first look at Panasonic’s video-focused Micro Four Thirds GH7 in June. It’s not the biggest upgrade ever, but it includes some very interesting technologies, such as 32-bit float audio.
Two more summer successes: we published an interview with Nikon, and a sample gallery for Sigma’s cutting-edge F1.8 zoom lens.
July
Leica D-Lux 8 Preview
The D-Lux 8 is a bit of an odd camera, as it’s essentially a refresh of a years-old camera with a substantial price tag. Still, we find it compelling – not only is it one of the only enthusiast compacts to be released in years, but its interface focuses purely on the basics of photography.
Canon EOS R1 Preview
We also got to look at Canon’s first true mirrorless sports flagship, the EOS R1. It brings a lot to the table, especially with its Action Priority AF system, which ended up being crowned with our Innovation of the Year award.
Another accomplishment in July was writing up interviews with several manufacturers, including Panasonic, Tamron, Sony and Canon, and published the final chapter in a series about a nature photography tour of Madagascar.
August
Fujifilm X-T50 Review
In August, we published an in-depth review of Fujifilm’s then-entry-level camera – the X-M5 hadn’t been announced yet. We found that, if you can put the price aside, it’s a nice entry point into the X-mount system for someone looking to get into photography and who wants to play around with the company’s famous Film Simulation modes.
August is typically a glacial month for camera news, but we were able to spend some of it shooting sample galleries; we tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro and Pixel 9 Pro XL and Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM II and published our gallery from the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 II. We also told the oft-overlooked story of how Kodak’s film business ended up in the hands of the UK Government’s Pension Protection Fund, begged manufacturers for an enthusiast compact, and got to hear about the state of the camera industry from the people who actually make those cameras.
September
Canon EOS R5 II
In September, things kicked back into gear, starting with our review of Canon’s EOS R5 II, a wildly impressive camera that we found was up to almost any task. For those that occasionally shoot sports, it also includes the Action Priority AF system that impressed us so much with the larger, more expensive EOS R1.
Leica Q3 43
We also got to fully review Leica’s latest fixed-lens camera, a variant of its Q3 with a 43mm F2 lens instead of a 28mm lens. We thoroughly enjoyed the experience of shooting with it, and getting to use Leica’s photo-focused controls… though, obviously, it’s tough to ignore the hefty price tag, especially when you’re out and about on the streets.
September was also a big month for phones. As is tradition, Apple announced the iPhone 16 which included a dedicated camera button – we broke down exactly what changes it made to the cameras compared to previous versions here – and we got to shoot a sample gallery with Google’s Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
October
Sony ZV-E10 II Review
We started October with our review of the Sony ZV-E10 II. Appropriately for a vlogging camera, the bulk of our review was published as a video, which you can see above. Of course, there is still plenty to dig into in the written review.
Nikon Z6III Review
Just a day after publishing the ZV-E10 II review, we were back with our in-depth look at the Nikon Z6III, a camera that impressed us with its all-around capabilities. Its ‘partially-stacked’ sensor comes with a minor hit to dynamic range, but in most circumstances, the speed improvements it brings will more than make up for that.
During October, we also published sample galleries for the Fujifilm XF16-55mm F2.8 II and Panasonic 18-40mm F4.5-6.3, as well as a review of a Lowepro backpack over a decade in the making. It was also the month we went to Adobe’s Max conference to get a sneak peak at some of what the future holds for products like Photoshop, Lightroom, Adobe Camera Raw, and Content Credentials.
A few more can’t-miss pieces: we looked back at the Fujifilm X-E series to get an idea of what a potential X-E5 might be like, saw a DIY camera, and covered why so many cameras seem to be aimed at people other than photographers these days.
November
Panasonic S9 Review
In November, we published our review of Panasonic’s S9, an entry-level full-frame camera focused on making it fast and easy for creators to shoot and share videos and photos. We appreciated its size and Real-Time LUT system, but found that it gave up quite a lot, such as ergonomics, a mechanical shutter, a viewfinder and hot shoe, to achieve that size and price point.
We also published initial reviews of the entry-level Nikon Z50II and professional flagship Sony a1 II. While writing the latter, we also got to film our experience of using it to shoot part of a US football game, which ended up making for a great video.
We also, as part of our 25th anniversary content, wrote about the first camera DPReivew ever reviewed: the Canon PowerShot Pro70, and got the opportunity to interview a photographer who took over 100,000 portraits in a single year.
December
Fujifilm X-M5 review
Hopefully, you’re not tired of creator-focused cameras because our last review rounding out 2024 was of the Fujifilm X-M5. We found that it packs a lot of photo and video features into a compact body that’s priced within reach of beginners, but comes with a few tradeoffs that are worth noting.
We also published an article comparing Nikon’s modern 50mm F1.4 lens, which is a budget model that trades clinical sharpness for character, and its DSLR-era 50mm F1.4 lens, which was its professional offering for a few years. It’s an interesting look at how far lenses have come over the past decade.
Of course, December was also when we put out our annual DPReview Awards, recognizing the best gear released throughout the year.
That brings us to today. The X-M5 review was our last one for the year, but we’ll be back with more in January. Be sure to check out the rest of our end-of-year articles, and let us know in the comments: what were your favorite moments of 2024?
Camera
Merry Christmas and happy holidays from DPReview!
Season’s greetings! We’ve almost reached the end of 2024, and as is our custom, the DPReview team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Boxing Day, Happy Kwanzaa, Joyous Festivus, and Happy Holiday to all. We’re incredibly grateful you’ve stuck with us for yet another orbit around the sun.
2024 was an important year for DPReview symbolically. One year ago today, on December 25, 2023, we celebrated the site’s 25th anniversary. For the past 12 months, we’ve been looking back at some of the moments and milestones from that past quarter century. We couldn’t have reached this point without your support.
2024 has also been an important chapter for DPReview as a business. Many of you know we’ve been going through a period of rebuilding. Every person at DPReview, including many folks behind the scenes, has poured their heart and soul into this effort. Why? Because at a fundamental level, we believe that an internet with DPReview is better than one without it.
The hard work is paying off. You might recall that a couple of months ago, we advertised some new editorial roles on the site, and I’m thrilled to report that we’ll have a couple of new faces joining the team early next year.
“At a fundamental level, we believe that an internet with DPReview is better than one without it.”
A huge factor in that success has been our community. Whether you’re a regular in the forums or just pop in to comment under the occasional article, we’re grateful for your contributions. Our forums are a goldmine of information, crowd-sourced from knowledgeable people for over 25 years. Our homepage may get a lot of attention, but the forums are where the magic happens: exchanging ideas, forming communities, and forging personal connections.
In fact, we’re planning to ramp up support for our online community in 2025. Remember those new staff members I mentioned? One of them will be focused on supporting our forums, including our team of volunteer moderators. This will be the first time we’ve had a person on our team dedicated to this task, and to be candid, it’s overdue.
Before you leave today, we’d love it if you’d take a moment to leave a comment and let us know what made 2024 at DPReview memorable for you. Or, if you’re feeling prophetic, please tell us what you’d like to see in the coming year.
From all of us at DPReview – the editors who craft the stories, the tech wizards who keep the lights on, and the business team who keep us on solid footing – we wish you all a happy and healthy holiday season. We’re genuinely excited about what the future holds and look forward to having you by our side as we embark on the next 25 years.
Camera
2024 in review: the most important trends in photography this year
2024 In Review
2024 is just about over, so we thought it’d be a good time to look back and identify some trends that started emerging or kept going strong throughout the year. This isn’t a recap of all the news that happened – we’ll be releasing one of those soon enough – but rather a broad look at the direction the industry is going, which may give us an idea of what to expect throughout 2025.
Global Shutter
It’s hard to say that global shutter was a trend in 2024; in terms of consumer mirrorless cameras, there was only one with the tech, the Sony a9 III. Given the benefits it brings, though – the ability to sync with full-power flash at almost any speed, the ability to shoot stills at 120fps, and to use shutter speeds up to 1/80,000 sec to capture the fastest subjects without any blur – we fully expect to see it come to more high-end sports / action cameras.
That’s not to say that the a9 III’s sensor is perfect. Compared to its rolling shutter counterparts, it takes a hit to absolute image quality with its 250 base ISO, which means it has about a stop more noise than most of its competitors.
However, if you need the performance a global shutter offers, it’s likely none of those caveats will be deal breakers. We just mention them to say that we don’t expect to see global shutters in cameras that are focused on image quality above all else, such as the Sony a7R series or a follow-up to the Nikon Z8 – at least not in 2025 or even 2026.
Physical color mode controls
This year, it felt like every other camera had a physical control for color modes. Fujifilm’s Film Simulation dial, included on the X-T50 and X-M5, feels like the obvious example, but it was far from the only one: Panasonic put a LUT button on the creator-focused S9 – and then gave its users the option to backport one onto other cameras – and Nikon included a button to bring up its Picture Control menu on the Z50II.
Physical color mode controls aren’t a brand-new thing. We saw one on the Olympus Pen-F in 2016. But this is the year they definitively became a trend.
Only time will tell if they stick around. Camera manufacturers will likely be paying very close attention to whether consumers actually value being able to easily change the look of their photos and videos using a physical button or dial. If it turns out they do, this year’s crop of cameras likely won’t be the last we see with a color mode control.
APS-C shooters have more options than ever
2024 was the year that Canon and Nikon started allowing more and more third-party APS-C lenses onto their systems. At the beginning of the year, you only had a handful of options if you wanted a third-party autofocus lens for RF or Z-mount. Now, you have significantly more.
The change came from some of the usual suspects, as well as some smaller companies. Sigma and Tamron were the first to announce they’d be bringing their lenses to RF mount, but Samyang slid in under the wire with an announcement that it, too, would start producing lenses for the system.
Most of Sigma’s DC DN primes have been available on Z-mount since early 2023, but this year, we’ve seen a slew of autofocus primes become available for the system from brands like Siuri and Viltrox.
There are still holes in the lineup for each brand, though – neither has a great telephoto option, and there aren’t any fast zoom Z-mount lenses – which is why we’d like to see this trend continue into 2025. If we’re really dreaming, maybe Canon and Nikon will allow more third-party full-frame glass, but we’ll save our fantasies for a different article.
The rise of smaller full-frame lenses
Speaking of full-frame glass, this year we’ve also seen a trend of smaller, lighter full-frame lenses. Panasonic’s 18-40mm F4.5-6.3 for L-mount is the most obvious example – the company says it’s the “smallest and lightest interchangeable zoom with autofocus for full-frame mirrorless cameras” – but Sony’s FE 24-50mm F2.8 is also a great, compact new lens that makes a ton of sense on smaller bodies like the a7CR.
Even the big lenses have been getting smaller – Sigma’s second-gen 24-70 F2.8 is 10% lighter than its predecessor, a difference that’ll definitely be noticeable in hour eight of shooting a wedding. Sony’s 85mm F1.4 GM II also boasts a 20% weight reduction compared to the original.
Again, this trend isn’t exactly new. We’ve seen a few lenses that have been largely defined by their size; Canon’s original RF 70-200mm F2.8 from 2019 and Sony’s 70-200mm F2.8 GM II from 2022 come to mind. But with further advances in optics and manufacturing techniques, we hope to see even more full-frame lenses come out that are smaller and lighter than the ones that came before… even if they still won’t be able to out-compact Fujifilm’s XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II.
The AI age
Pretty much every industry has had its own deluge of AI-related news in 2024, and photography is no exception. The continued proliferation of AI-generated images and text has sparked near-endless debates about what place, if any, the technology has in photography, with some people even taking the extreme position that the ubiquitous ability to generate images will destroy the art form altogether (assuming those comments too, aren’t AI-generated).
It’s not all existential doom and gloom, though, as some companies have used AI to try and improve the experience of photography rather than replace it. For instance, the new Canon EOS R1 and R5 II have Action Priority AF modes, which use machine learning-based algorithms to determine which subject to focus on during key moments in certain sports. It could be thought of as context recognition, rather than the subject recognition that’s become table stakes for most cameras. The EOS R1 and R5 II also have built-in AI-derived noise-reduction and upscaling functions, should you choose to use them.
AI-powered denoising and upscaling are also making their way into photo editing software, such as Lightroom or the apps from companies like Topaz Labs. And while Adobe has added plenty of generative AI features to Photoshop, we’ve also seen other AI-powered improvements, such as its distraction removal mode and Adobe Camera Raw’s new Adaptive profile and reflection removal feature.
However you feel about the technology, it’s almost certainly here to stay. The good news is that another facet of the AI trend this year has been companies working on improving transparency around AI, creating tools to prove a photo’s authenticity or show exactly how it’s been manipulated, either by AI or through more conventional means. The tech is far from ubiquitous, but it seems likely that we’ll see it spread to more and more platforms as AI becomes even more prevalent.
-
Solar Energy3 years ago
DLR testing the use of molten salt in a solar power plant in Portugal
-
Camera1 year ago
DJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?
-
world news1 year ago
Gulf, France aid Gaza, Russia evacuates citizens
-
Camera1 year ago
Sony a9 III: what you need to know
-
world news1 year ago
Strong majority of Americans support Israel-Hamas hostage deal
-
Camera4 years ago
Charles ‘Chuck’ Geschke, co-founder of Adobe and inventor of the PDF, dies at 81
-
Solar Energy1 year ago
Glencore eyes options on battery recycling project
-
Indian Defense3 years ago
Israeli Radar Company Signs MoU To Cooperate With India’s Alpha Design Technologies