Connect with us

Camera

Best cameras under $1500

Published

on

Best cameras under 00


Updated: Nov 6, 2023

Spending $1500 – or the equivalent amount in your local currency – on a camera can seem like a daunting prospect, but this is the price bracket where the cameras start to get really good. The past few years have seen great advances in the power and simplicity of autofocus, and the cost of full-frame cameras has dropped, meaning there are some really capable options at this price.

The $1500 price bracket includes the more affordable full-frame cameras – so-called because their sensors are the same size as a piece of 35mm film – or some of the higher-end APS-C models.

With the right lenses full-frame can offer better image quality than an APS-C camera. But choosing a sensor size is a balance between size, price and image quality. An APS-C camera can be smaller, especially once you factor the lenses in, and one in the $1500 price range is likely to shoot faster and may have more sophisticated features than a full-frame model at the same price. After extensive use, the following cameras would be our picks, in this price range:


Our picks:


Best camera for under $1500: Canon EOS R8

24 MP full-frame CMOS sensor | 4K/60p 10-bit video recording | 8 fps burst shooting

The EOS R8 is one of the most affordable way to gain the image quality benefits of a full-frame sensor. Lens availability is a concern, but it’s a capable and enjoyable camera to use.

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:


What we like:

  • Great image quality
  • Very good AF subject detection and tracking
  • Good starting price

What we don’t:

  • No in-body image stabilization
  • Short battery life
  • No AF joystick

The Canon EOS R8 is a surprisingly capable compact full-frame mirrorless camera that has the features and image quality of Canon’s EOS R6 II at a much lower price.

The EOS R8 has a comfortable grip and twin dials, giving a good level of direct control. There aren’t many buttons so more committed users may want to move up to the EOS R6 II, rather than rely on the quick menu for changing settings.

Autofocus is the R8’s strong suit: tracking and subject detection are simple to use and very effective. There’s no AF joystick, so you’ll have to use the touchscreen or select a subject and recompose. Battery life is very limited for an entry-level full-frame camera, though it can charge over USB, at least.

“If you’re partial to Canon and are new to full-frame mirrorless, the EOS R8 is a great place to start your photographic journey.”

The R8 shoots attractive video, including 4K footage at up to 60p. The lack of in-body stabilization means you’ll need a stabilized lens or a tripod to get the best results.

Photos are on par with more expensive full-frame cameras, with great high ISO performance, detail-preserving noise reduction, and Canon’s pleasing JPEG colors. The 40 fps burst mode is prone to rolling shutter distortion, reducing its usefulness for capturing action.

The EOS R8 offers the image quality and many of the features of Canon’s more expensive models but battery life and viewfinder resolution are part of the price you pay for that. The RF mount is still fairly new so it’s worth researching your lens options before buying, but an adapter allows the use of EF DSLR lenses if you have them.




Enjoyable to shoot with: Nikon Z5

24MP full-frame sensor | In-body image stabilization | 4K/30p video

The Nikon Z5’s view and autofocus aren’t as good as those of the Canon EOS R8 but it can be nicer to use in some regards, not least thanks to its larger battery and high-res viewfinder.

Photo: Dan Bracaglia

Buy now:


What we like:

  • Excellent image quality
  • Superb build quality
  • Effective image stabilization

What we don’t:

  • 4K video has heavy crop
  • Heavy-handed high ISO noise reduction
  • Noticeable rolling shutter

We also really liked the Nikon Z5, which sells for around the same price as the Canon.

The Nikon Z5 is among the most affordable entry-level full-framer cameras ever released. It sports a stabilized 24MP CMOS chip with on-sensor phase detect AF, packed inside a robust, best-in-class body.

“The Z5 is good for anyone seeking a well-priced, stills-oriented full-frame mirrorless camera”

Its autofocus isn’t quite as reliable as the R8’s and its video is nowhere near as good, but if anything we find it a slightly more enjoyable camera to actually use and it offers in-body image stabilization, which the Canon lacks. It has a higher resolution viewfinder and a joystick for positioning its autofocus point, which makes a surprisingly big difference to usability. It also offers significantly better battery life than the Canon, which is another nice-to-have feature.




Other full-frame cameras we considered

We also considered the Sony a7 II, which is still available at some very tempting looking prices. This isn’t the bargain it might seem. The a7 II was launched in late 2014 and cameras have come a long way since then. Sony has updated the autofocus, menus and ergonomics of the a7 series significantly since the launch of the a7 II, and has adopted a much larger battery, all of which are worth spending more money to gain. Sony’s E-mount has the widest selection of lenses of any mirrorless system, but we’d recommend saving for an a7 III instead of buying the a7 II at this point.

It’s a similar story with the Sony a7C, at this point. The a7C includes many of the features of the a7 III in a smaller body, but its small, low resolution viewfinder and lack of a front command dial mean you pay a significant cost in terms of usability in that downsizing.


Most versatile option: Sony a6700

26MP BSI CMOS sensor | 4K/60p video capture | Fully articulating screen

The Sony a6700 combines all-round stills and video capabilities with class-leading autofocus. The standard 16-50mm kit zoom’s not great, though.

Photo: Richard Butler

Buy now:


What we like:

  • Front and rear command dials
  • Excellent AF in stills and video
  • 4K/120p capture (with crop)

What we don’t:

  • No AF joystick
  • JPEG sharpening can be aggressive

The Sony a6700 is an enthusiast-level APS-C mirrorless camera built around an image-stabilized, 26MP BSI CMOS sensor. It includes an impressive collection of features for both photo and video shooters.

The a6700 has a twin-dial interface missing from less expensive models. It’s just slightly larger than previous models in the line, but in exchange, you also get a fully articulating display. However, it lacks the AF joystick found on many cameras in its class.

Autofocus on the a6700 offers class-leading subject detection and tracking capabilities. Combined with a dedicated ‘AI’ processor, it effectively tracks subjects around the frame even when shooting at the maximum 11 fps burst shooting rate.

“Excellent photo and video quality with best-in-class AF in stills and video make it an excellent choice for enthusiasts.”

Image quality is very good in JPEG or Raw. JPEG colors are pleasing to the eye, though sharpening can be a bit aggressive. Base ISO noise levels are consistent with other modern APS-C models but in low light it exhibits a little more noise.

The camera produces very detailed 4K video up to 60p with 10-bit color, with good rolling shutter performance. There’s also a 4K/120p mode, albeit with a 1.58x crop. Autofocus performance is top-notch, with a well-designed touch interface. It’s a strong option both for videographers and vloggers.

Excellent photo and video quality, best-in-class AF in stills and video, and a deep set of features to support both make it an excellent choice for enthusiasts. Sony’s E-mount also includes a good range of available lenses.




The creative choice: Fujifilm X-S20

26MP X-Trans APS-C sensor | Up to 6.2K/30P 10-bit video | In-body image stablization

We found the X-S20 to be a capable stills and video all-rounder, though the autofocus tracking isn’t quite as reliable as its rivals’.

Photo: Brendan Nystedt

Buy now:


What we like:

  • Excellent still and video quality
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable, simple ergonomics

What we don’t:

  • AF tracking still lags behind peers
  • Small electronic viewfinder
  • Micro HDMI instead of full-size

The Fujifilm X-S20 is a compact 26MP APS-C mirrorless camera with image stabilization that takes features of the company’s higher-end models and puts them into a DSLR-styled body with a large grip.

In most respects the Sony a6700 has the edge over the X-S20, particularly in terms of autofocus performance. But what the Fujifilm offers is a wide selection of photographer-friendly prime lenses, both from Fujifilm itself and companies such as Sigma and Viltrox. This, and the attractive Film Simulation modes, make it worth considering.

“The X-S20 delivers a long list of options to still shooters and vloggers alike, all while offering solid battery life.”

The X-S20’s video specs are impressive, with 10-bit 4K capture at up to 60p. Videographers will appreciate its F-Log capture, while the Eterna color profile is attractive if you want a simpler workflow. An optional fan extends record times but autofocus isn’t especially dependable.

The X-S20 takes Fujifilm’s higher-end still and video features and puts them into a simple, cleanly designed body with built-in image stabilization. Image quality is great, autofocus is good in most situations, and the breadth of video features is impressive.



The affordable kit: Fujifilm X-S10 with 18-55mm F2.8-4.0 OIS lens

26MP X-Trans CMOS sensor | In-body image stabilization | 4K/30p video capture

The X-S10 isn’t as sophisticated as the X-S20, particularly in terms of video capture, but the 18-55mm F2.8-4.0 OIS lens (pictured) is a really good lens, whereas some of the lenses included with other cameras are not.

Buy now:


The older Fujifilm X-S10 is also worth considering. It’s a little less sophisticated than the X-S20, with less reliable autofocus, less effective image stabilization, lower video spec and a smaller battery all making the newer model a better choice. Our reason for including it comes down to what you can get with it if you have a strict $1500 budget: a good lens. The other cameras here are typically only fit within the price range when bought body-only or with a rather basic zoom.

For less than $1500 you can buy the X-S10 with the 18-55mm F2.8-4.0 OIS lens. This is one of the best ‘kit’ zooms on the market: covering a useful range, offering good optical performance and letting in more light than is typical, which helps you access more of the camera’s image quality potential. An X-S20 with the 18-55mm is an even better choice, but it strays over this guide’s headline target price.




Other APS-C cameras we considered

Also available in this price range is the Canon EOS R7. It’s a very capable camera with impressive specs and the same highly effective autofocus system as the EOS R8. However, at present there are relatively few lenses available for it, and most of them are fairly slow aperture zooms or prime lenses with focal lengths that make more sense on full-frame cameras, effectively reducing the options further.

You can adapt Canon’s EF-mount DSLR lenses, but the extra depth of the adapter makes this rather unweildy. If you’re happy to stick with one of the rather pedestrian RF-S kit zooms, the EOS R7 is a lovely camera, but the Fujifilm and Sony currently offer so much more room to grow.

The compact option: OM System OM-5

20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor | 4K/30p video | In-body stabilization rated to 6.5EV (7.5 with some lenses)

The OM-5 offers a smaller, more rugged alternative to APS-C or full-frame cameras.

Photo: Shaminder Dulai

Buy now:


There’s a third option when it comes to striking the size/price/image quality balance of sensor sizes: Four Thirds. The Micro Four Thirds system uses a sensor one quarter the size of that in ‘full-frame,’ which means there’ll be an appreciable image quality hit in many situations and it’ll be harder to achieve the blurry backgrounds that full-frame can give. The flipside, though is a significantly smaller system for which some of the lenses are much less expensive.

What we like:

  • Attractive JPEG output
  • Selection of clever photo features
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • IP53 rating supports claims of weather sealing

What we don’t:

  • AF tracking is disappointing
  • Image quality is behind larger sensor cameras

The OM System OM-5 is a compact 20MP image-stabilized Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera.

The OM-5 has a compact body but a decent number of control points and offers a high degree of customization. Its menu system is quite cluttered by the camera’s extensive array of features. Viewfinder and rear screen are typical for the price.

It has good phase-detect autofocus with face detection, but tracking for other subjects is distinctly unreliable. Using a single point or zone of focus and trying to keep up with the subject yields best results, but is somewhat awkward due to the lack of an AF joystick.

“Its combination of IP-rated weather sealing, image stabilization and compact size helps the OM-5 offer something different”

Image quality is good for its sensor size, with attractive JPEGs and flexible Raw files. A 12-shot handheld high-res mode lets it punch above its weight if your scene has relatively little movement. Excellent image stabilization expands the camera’s working range, and unique features like Live ND mean you rarely need a tripod.

The OM-5’s 4K video isn’t the most detailed, but this is made up for by some of the best image stabilization on the market, making the OM-5 a competent hand-held video option. Video AF tracks faces and people decently, but can struggle with other kinds of subjects.

The OM-5 offers strong all-round capability with excellent image stabilization in a compact IP53-rated weather-sealed body and access to one of the largest mirrorless camera lens systems.




Why you should trust us

This buying guide is based on cameras used and tested by DPReview’s editorial team. We don’t select a camera until we’ve used it enough to be confident in recommending it, usually after our extensive review process. The selections are purely a reflection of which cameras we believe to be best: there are no financial incentives for us to select one model or brand over another.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Pentax K-1 and K-1 II firmware updates include astrophotography features (depending on where you live)

Published

on

By

Pentax K-1 and K-1 II firmware updates include astrophotography features (depending on where you live)


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Yesterday, Ricoh quietly released firmware 2.50 for its Pentax K-1 and K-1 II DSLRs. However, the features you can expect to gain from this update may depend on your geography.

Ricoh’s English-language firmware pages for the K-1 and K-1 II state that firmware 2.50 delivers “Improved stability for general performance.”

However, astute Pentax users noted that Ricoh’s Japanese-language firmware pages (translation) indicate that the update also includes a limited feature called “Astronomical Photo Assist,” a collection of three new features designed for astrophotography: Star AF, remote control focus fine adjustment, and astronomical image processing.

Star AF is intended to automate focusing on stars when using autofocus lenses. Rather than manually focusing on a bright star and changing your composition, it promises to let you compose your shot and let the camera focus.

Remote control fine adjustment allows users to adjust focus without touching the lens and requires Pentax’s optional O-RC1 remote. Astronomical image processing will enable users to make in-camera adjustments to astrophotography images, including shading correction, fogging correction, background darkness, star brightness, celestial clarity, and fringe correction.

Astronomical image processing on the K-1 and K-1 II will enable users to make in-camera adjustments to astrophotography images, including shading correction, fogging correction, background darkness, star brightness, celestial clarity, and fringe correction.

According to Ricoh, Astronomical Photo Assist is a premium feature that must be purchased and costs ¥11,000 for an activation key (about $70 at current exchange rates).

Although these astrophotography features appear to be Japan-only for now, a Ricoh representative tells us, “Ricoh Imaging Americas confirmed that the premium firmware features for the PENTAX K-1 and PENTAX K-1 Mark II will eventually be available to US customers.”

Firmware update 2.50 for both the K-1 and K-1 II is available for download from Ricoh’s website.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850

Published

on

By

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

As part of our twenty fifth anniversary, we’re looking back at some of the most significant cameras launched and reviewed during that period. Today’s pick was launched seven years ago today* and yet we’re only quite recently stepping out of its shadow.

The Nikon D850 is likely to be remembered as the high watermark of DSLR technology. We may yet still see impressive developments from Ricoh in the future (we’d love to see a significantly upgraded Pentax K-1 III), but the D850 was perhaps the green flash as the sun set on the DSLR as the dominant technology in the market.

Click here to read our Nikon D850 review

Why do we think it was such a big deal? Because it got just about everything right. Its 45MP sensor brought dual conversion gain to high pixel count sensors, meaning excellent dynamic range at base ISO and lower noise at high ISOs. Its autofocus system was one of the best we’ve ever seen on a DSLR: easy to use and highly dependable, with a good level of coverage. And then there was a body and user interface honed by years of iterative refinement, that made it easy to get the most out of the camera.

None of this is meant as a slight towards the other late-period DSLRs but the likes of Canon’s EOS 5DS and 5DSR didn’t present quite such a complete package of AF tracking, daylight DR and low-light quality as the Nikon did. With its ability to shoot at up to 9fps (if you used the optional battery grip), the D850 started to chip away at the idea that high megapixel cameras were specialized landscape and studio tools that would struggle with movement or less-than-perfect lighting. And that’s without even considering its 4K video capabilities.

In the seven years since the D850 was launched, mirrorless cameras have eclipsed most areas in which DSLRs once held the advantage. For example, the Z8 can shoot faster, autofocus more with more accuracy and precision, across a wider area of the frame and do so while shooting at much faster rates.

But, even though it outshines the D850 in most regards, the Z8 is still based around what we believe is a (significant) evolution of the same sensor, and its reputation still looms large enough for Nikon to explicitly market the Z8 as its “true successor.”

Nikon D850 sample gallery

Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

*Actually seven years ago yesterday: we had to delay this article for a day to focus on the publishing the Z6III studio scene: the latest cameras taking precedence over our anniversary content.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear

Published

on

By

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Photo: Richard Butler

We’ve just received a production Nikon Z6III and took it into our studio immediately to get a sense for how the sensor really performs.

Dynamic range tests have already been conducted, but these only give a limited insight into the image quality as a whole. As expected, our Exposure Latitude test – which mimics the effect of reducing exposure to capture a bright sunrise or sunset, then making use of the deep shadows – shows a difference if you use the very deepest shadows, just as the numerical DR tests imply.

Likewise, our ISO Invariance test shows there’s more of a benefit to be had from applying more amplification by raising the ISO setting to overcome the read noise, than there was in the Z6 II. This means there’s a bigger improvement when you move up to the higher gain step of the dual conversion gain sensor but, as with the Z6 II, little more to be gained beyond that.

These are pushing at the extreme of the sensor’s performance though. For most everyday photography, you don’t use the deepest shadows of the Raw files, so differences in read noise between sensors don’t play much of a role. In most of the tones of an image, sensor size plays a huge role, along with any (pretty rare) differences in light capturing efficiency.

Image Comparison
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

As expected, the standard exposures look identical to those of the Z6 II. There are similar (or better) levels of detail at low ISO, in both JPEG and Raw. At higher ISO, the Z6III still looks essentially the same as the Z6II. Its fractionally higher level of read noise finally comes back to have an impact at very, very high ISO settings.

Overall, then, there is a read noise price to be paid for the camera’s faster sensor, in a way that slightly blunts the ultimate flexibility of the Raw files at low ISO and that results in fractionally more noise at ultra-high ISOs. But we suspect most people will more than happily pay this small price in return for a big boost in performance.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending