Connect with us

Camera

Fujifilm XF23mm F2 R WR lens review

Published

on

Fujifilm XF23mm F2 R WR lens review


The Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR is a very compact, portable, wide-angle prime lens for Fujifilm X-mount cameras.

It makes a great walkaround lens and is well-suited for uses like travel and street photography, as well as things such as moderately wide landscapes and environmental portraiture.

The XF 23mm F2 R WR carries a list price of $450.


Index:


Key specifications:

  • Focal length: 23mm (35mm-equivalent)
  • Aperture range: F2 – F16
  • In-lens stabilization: No
  • Filter thread: 43mm
  • Close focus: 0.22m (8.7″)
  • Maximum magnification: 0.13x
  • Diaphragm blades: 9
  • Hood: Included, plastic
  • Weight: 180g (6.4oz)
  • Optical construction: 10 elements in 6 groups, two aspherical
Fujifilm X-H2 | ISO 125 | 1/220 sec | F 4
Photo: Mike Tomkins

All images edited in Capture One with manufacturer’s corrections applied. Adjustments limited to white balance, exposure, highlights, shadows, white and black levels.


Buy now:


How it compares

Although it has quite a few rivals that are at least in its ballpark, the XF 23mm F2 is a lens with no direct competition, either from Fujifilm or third parties. Unlike every other X-mount option at this focal length, it opts for a slightly less bright F2.0 maximum aperture instead of the more typical F1.4.

That means you’ll need to use up to a one-stop longer shutter speed to maintain a similar exposure level, or you’ll need to accept a lower exposure and increase the ISO. It also won’t give you quite the same potential for bokeh-licious backgrounds when shooting up close. However, the narrower aperture is the special sauce, making this lens much more travel-friendly than the F1.4 alternatives.

Below, we compare the XF 23mm F2 against its AF-equipped F1.4 rivals:

Fujifilm XF23mm F2 R WR Fujifilm XF23mm F1.4 R LM WR Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN | C Tokina atx-m 23mm f/1.4 Viltrox AF23mm F1.4 XF
Price (MSRP) $450 $900 $549 $499 $329
Optical construction 10 elements, 6 groups 15 elements, 10 groups 13 elements, 10 groups 11 elements, 10 groups 11 elements, 10 groups
Special elements 2 aspherical 2 aspherical, 3 ED 2 aspherical, 3 SLD 2 Low-dispersion 2 ED, 2 high refraction index
Aperture blades 9 9 9 9 9
Aperture control Lens ring Lens ring Controlled from camera Lens ring Lens ring
Weather sealed Yes Yes Yes, mount only No No
AF drive DC coreless Linear motor Stepping motor Stepping motor Stepping motor
Minimum focus distance / max magnification 0.22m (8.66) / 0.13x 0.19m (7.48) / 0.2x 0.25m (9.9) / 0.14x 0.30m (11.8) / 0.1x 0.30m (11.8) / 0.1x
Filter size 43mm 58mm 52mm 52mm 52mm
Diameter x Length
(no hood)
60mm x 51.9mm (2.36″ x 2.04″) 67mm x 77.8mm (2.63″ x 3.06″) 65.8mm x 79.2mm (2.6″ x 3.1″) 65mm x 72mm (2.6″ x 3.1″) 65mm x 72mm (2.6″ x 3.1″)
Weight 180g (6.4oz) 375g (13.1oz) 335g (11.8oz) 276g (9.6oz) 260g (9.2oz)

The eagle-eyed will note one intentional omission, as Fujifilm itself has offered two different 23mm F1.4 lenses for X-mount. Considering their identical pricing and the lack of stock for Fujifilm’s earlier XF 23mm F1.4 R, it has largely been replaced by the newer 23mm F1.4 R LM WR model, even if it’s not officially discontinued.

Had we included the original Fujifilm 23mm F1.4 R on the list, though, it would be the nearest OEM option in terms of size and weight, even if still larger and heavier by two-thirds. It would also prove somewhat hobbled by stepping motor-driven autofocus and a seven-bladed aperture.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/240 sec | F2
Photo: Rishi Sanyal

Like all other rivals, the newer XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR opts for a nine-bladed aperture instead. Its linear autofocus motor should give it an edge in AF performance, and a more complex optical formula portends better image quality, too. In turn, it’ll also focus closer than every rival for a higher maximum magnification and the potential for creamier bokeh.

Both OEM alternatives are double the price of the XF 23mm F2, though, which is pretty standard pricing for lenses that can let in twice as much light. If you want a closer value proposition, you’ll need to consider third-party glass. Sigma is the most expensive third-party option, costing 22% more, while the Viltrox is 27% cheaper than the Fujifilm F2.

But there are some tradeoffs to going with one of the faster third-party optics: they’re heavier and largely skip on weather sealing, so it depends on what your priorities are.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/180 sec | F2.8
Photo: Samuel Spencer

Sigma does include a seal, but only at the lens mount. Its 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary lens is the largest, heaviest and priciest third-party option, but also the most optically sophisticated and closest-focusing, roughly matching the Fuji 23mm F2. It also lacks a physical aperture control on the lens barrel, something provided by every other lens in this comparison.

The Viltrox AF23mm F1.4 XF is the most affordable option by some $120. It’s also the lightest alternative to the 23mm F2, although it’s still some 44% heavier. Tokina sits somewhere between the Sigma and Viltrox in price, although closer to the latter as it appears to share the same optical design (though possibly with different coatings, firmware etc.)

[I’m still uncomfortable with the idea of suggesting the Tokina sits between the Sigma and Viltrox in terms of specs. It sits between them in terms of price, but it’s so close to being the same lens as the Tokina that it still reads as if we don’t know that]

Speaking of Tokina, note that there’s also a renamed PLUS version of its lens. This is identical to the standard variant except for a higher price tag and a bundled lens cloth.

Back to top


Handling

Fujifilm’s XF 23mm F2 R WR lens isn’t just smaller than its F1.4 rivals; it’s also an extremely compact lens in its own right. By itself, it measures just 52mm (2.0″) long with a 60mm (2.4″) diameter, and the included lens hood only adds another 8mm (0.3″) to the length.

Despite its solid, all-metal construction, the XF 23mm F2 tips the scales at a svelte 180g (6.4 oz), making for a great walkaround lens. The plastic hood adds just another 8g (0.3 oz), which isn’t enough to notice in hand.

The all-metal exterior and nicely damped lens rings help to lend a premium, quality feel.

Thanks to the compact size and minimal weight, balance will not be an issue even on the smallest X-mount camera bodies. And with just two control rings and no buttons, switches or other protrusions, it’s about as clean and simple a design as you could hope for.

The frontmost control ring is for manual focus adjustment and, thanks to Fujifilm’s by-wire focusing, spins smoothly and without limit in either direction. Nearer to the body mount, the aperture ring has clear markings for full-stop adjustments and a gentle click detent at every 1/3-stop position.

Attaching the plastic lens hood only adds fractionally to the lens’ size and weight.

This detent is soft enough that I found myself occasionally skipping slightly past my intended aperture or stopping between detents, but a firmer click stop would be noisier and slower to adjust, so I didn’t find this overly concerning.

Nor should you be too troubled by the elements while shooting with the 23mm F2. Comprehensive weather-sealing, not just at the lens mount but also as needed to seal control rings on the barrel.

The weather stayed dry throughout my own shooting, but Fujifilm says that this lens is designed to handle both light rain and dusty environments, so long as it’s mounted on a similarly-sealed camera body.


Autofocus and focus breathing

Typically, autofocus performance tends to be less of an issue for wide-angle lenses, and that’s certainly true of the XF 23mm F2. Its DC coreless AF motor delivers very swift, consistent, and confident focusing, and I had no issues even in relatively low light levels.

In my testing, autofocus was nearly always very quick, even with extreme changes in focus distance. Focusing is also pretty much silent, so if you disable any camera beeps, it won’t distract your subjects in the least.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/125 sec | F 2
Photo: Rishi Sanyal

This lens is also free from focus breathing, so it won’t distract your viewers with shifts in focal length as you tweak focus or use it to shoot video.


For videographers

Fujifilm isn’t aiming its 23mm F2 lens at videographers, but it could prove useful for video capture. As I mentioned earlier, the focus drive mechanism is quick, confident and essentially silent. Even when controlled manually, the focusing step size is small enough not to be bothersome.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/180 sec | F2
Photo: Rishi Sanyal

The only major downside from a videography perspective is that aperture adjustment isn’t stepless or silent, meaning changes will be visible (and possibly audible) if made while recording.


Image quality

Its portability is the real attention-grabber, but this lens also delivers a solid performance on the image quality front, especially in terms of its crispness and lack of distortion.

Sharpness

Stopped down a bit, this shot is pretty crisp all the way out to the corners.

Fujifilm X-H2 | ISO 125 | 1/8 sec (tripod-mounted) | F 5.6
Photo: Mike Tomkins

Detail-gathering is a key strength for the Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR, which is excellent news. Even when shooting wide-open, images are crisp in the centers, improving only slightly when stopped down to F2.8.

Corner detail is also pretty good, even when shooting wide-open, although it’s noticeably less crisp here than in the centers. You’ll want to stop down a little more for the crispest results, achieved around F4.

That said, we’re looking here at more typical shooting distances. Although probably not the most frequent use-case for the lens, if your subject is near its minimum focusing distance and you’re shooting wide open at the same time, things can get rather soft across the frame. You’re best off stopping down a little or shooting further from your subject.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 400 | 1/25 sec | F2
Photo: Samuel Spencer

I didn’t notice any significant issues with field curvature, either. The plane of focus is relatively flat, so I didn’t see a significant improvement in corner detail if I placed the autofocus point there instead.

Distortion and vignetting

Another strength of the Fujifilm 23mm F2 is its relative lack of distortion. Only very slight barrel distortion is present, which isn’t just being corrected in software. The same is true of Raw images processed without any manufacturer corrections, so this is down to the optical characteristics of the lens instead.

Sadly, the same isn’t true of vignetting. Relatively strong vignetting is present in Raws shot with the 23mm F2 R WR, and even with Fujifilm’s corrections applied in processing, vignetting remains quite noticeable when shooting wide-open.

Fuji’s 23mm F2 exhibits only the slightest amount of barrel distortion.

Fujifilm X-H2 | ISO 125 | 1/160 sec | F2
Photo: Mike Tomkins

That said, just stopping down from F2 to F2.8 helps significantly and the issue is entirely resolved by F5.6. The vignetting that remains after Fujifilm’s Raw processing also has a relatively gentle falloff, which isn’t unattractive and could be a positive for some subjects.

And, of course, should it bother you, the remaining vignetting is also pretty easy to correct in post-processing.

F2 F2.8 F4 F5.6 F8
Here, we see a comparison of vignetting levels at five different apertures. Note that these comparisons are being made after Fujifilm’s default vignetting correction has been applied. The real vignetting levels before processing are even higher!

Photos: Mike Tomkins

Bokeh

Although it won’t offer quite the same possibilities as its F1.4 rivals when it comes to bokeh, the Fujifilm 23mm F2 can nevertheless deliver some deliciously blurred-out backgrounds.

Given the tendency for wide-angle lenses towards greater depth of field, you’ll need to get quite close to the lens’ minimum focusing distance of just over 20cm (∼9″), should you want the best background separation. But since this is a wide-angle optic, it’s probably best used for wider portraits rather than closely-shot and tightly-cropped ones, putting you in a bit of an either/or situation. Also, as mentioned above, shooting close-up and wide-open isn’t this lens’s strong point.

Although it could be tricky to get a lot of background separation other than for nearer subjects, the good news is that backgrounds never feel busy when sufficiently blurred. The transition from in-focus to out-of-focus areas with this lens is quite pleasing, too.

Specular highlights also deliver very nice, rounded bokeh balls when shooting wide-open. Stopping down just a little, though – even just as far as F2.8 – you quickly notice flat spots forming on the bokeh balls and starbursts starting to form on the brightest highlights.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 250 | 1/60 sec | F2
Photo: Rishi Sanyal

While I sometimes noticed a little fine onion ring patterning on specular highlights, this was never strong enough to be objectionable. I did notice a tendency towards a brighter ‘soap bubble’ ring around bokeh balls.

The lens does create some cat’s eye bokeh, which is caused by the obstruction of incoming light by the lens barrel itself and leads the bokeh balls to become squashed on one side, leading them towards more of a cat’s eye shape.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 1600 | 1/60 sec | F2
Photo: Rishi Sanyal

Lateral and longitudinal chromatic aberration (fringing)

Although lateral chromatic aberration – often called LaCA – isn’t an issue for the Fujifilm 23mm F2 R WR, I found it prone to its similarly abbreviated counterpart, LoCA, or longitudinal chromatic aberration. That’s a pity, as LoCA is by far the more bothersome of the duo to tame in post-processing.

The good news, though, is that it’s pretty easy to solve before you ever get to the processing step in the first place. Stopping down to F2.8 improves the aberration significantly, and it’s largely gone by the time you reach F4.

F2 F2.8 F4
Here, we’re looking at 100% crops with three different apertures. Notice the blue and red halos on either side of the focal plane and how they have all but disappeared by F4.
Photos: Mike Tomkins

Flare, ghosting and sunstars

As I noted in the handling section, Fujifilm includes a very compact and lightweight plastic lens hood in the product bundle for the 23mm F2. This feels less high-end than the rest of the lens, but it definitely helps when you need to shoot at an angle where the sun might be starting to impinge on the front lens element.

Not surprisingly, given its shallow depth, it only moderately extends the range of angles you can shoot while keeping the lens shielded. Fujifilm would have had to make the hood much bulkier were it to have been any more effective, though, so that’s certainly understandable.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/90 sec | F11
Photo: Samuel Spencer

So what happens when you have to shoot nearer to the sun? Well, it turns out that the lens is pretty resistant to flare even when shooting very close to (or directly into) the sun. Catch it at the right angle, though, and it will accompany its relatively minor glare with some quite bright and colorful ghosts.

The good news is that you can get quite nice sunstars if you stop down. The aperture’s nine blades give 18-pointed sunstars that can have fairly long and crisp rays. The ghosting, if present, sometimes muddies these a bit with colorful streaks in between the main sunrays.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 800 | 1/200 sec | F11
Photo: Rishi Sanyal

Conclusion

Pros Cons
  • Very compact and lightweight
  • Affordably priced for OEM glass
  • Premium build with weather-sealing
  • Very swift, accurate and silent autofocus
  • Pretty crisp images, even wide-open
  • Excellent detail levels across the frame if stopped down a little
  • Minimal distortion
  • No focus breathing
  • Decent background separation when shooting up close and wide-open
  • Great resistance to lens flare
  • Shooting subjects close up at F2 can result in slightly soft images
  • Noticeable vignetting at the widest apertures, even after manufacturer corrections
  • LoCA is noticeable, especially at apertures wider than F2.8
  • Bokeh balls show some soap bubble effect and start to lose roundness by F2.8
  • Prone to cat’s eye bokeh

The Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR is a lens with quite a bit going for it, but perhaps one of the key factors is the lack of a direct F2 rival. If you want to shoot with a prime lens on a Fujifilm camera at this focal length, your other options are much bulkier, heavier lenses. (And most have less capable autofocus and weather-sealing, too.)

Sure, you trade away a stop-worth of maximum aperture, but in exchange, you get a trimmer and lighter lens, not to mention one that’s more affordably priced than all but one of its F1.4 rivals.

However, what if having a faster aperture is a priority? In that case, the Viltrox lens can get you there for more than $100 less, albeit with some of the above-mentioned caveats, and it’s about 30% lighter than Fujifilm’s own 23mm F1.4 lens. It’s still more than 40% heavier than the XF 23mm F2, however, but it could be a good Goldilocks option if you don’t need the weather sealing.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/210 sec | F2.5
Photo: Samuel Spencer

Yet despite its portability, the Fujifilm 23mm F2 still feels reassuringly solid in hand, and other than its plastic lens hood, it exudes a feeling of quality.

And it manages all this while delivering pretty solid image quality, with a few caveats. Distortion is nearly nonexistent, and bokeh is generally rather attractive, though you’ll get some cat’s eyes and mild soap bubble rings wide open, as well as some LoCA. These are tamed by stopping down the lens a little, where the excellent image quality seen at the center of the frame wide open is extended to bring the corners up to scratch as well.

There are still some downsides, like vignetting, a propensity towards LoCA and cat’s eye bokeh. There’s also the need to get very close to your subjects to maximize background blurring, but, as noted above, sharpness drops off when shooting close and wide open. At this price, and for the level of image quality it offers, not to mention its unique portability, the Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR is a decent option for X-mount shooters unless up-close, wide-open sharpness is a major concern.

Fujifilm X-T2 | ISO 200 | 1/210 sec | F2.8
Photo: Samuel Spencer

Sample galleries

Please do not reproduce any of these images without prior permission (see our copyright page).

Back to top


Scoring

Back to top


Buy now:




Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Enter your photos now in the December Editors' Challenge: 'Happy Holidays'

Published

on

By

Enter your photos now in the December Editors' Challenge: 'Happy Holidays'


Canon EOS 20D and 17-40mm F4 L lens | ISO 100 | 3.2 sec | F4

Photo: Dale Baskin

The December edition of the Editors’ Photo Challenge is open for submissions! Our theme this month is ‘Happy Holidays’.

Whatever holiday tradition inspires you – Christmas, Hanukkah, Boxing Day, Kwanzaa, Festivus, or something else – show us what the holiday season looks like through your lens. Whether it’s colorful lights, dazzling decorations, festive gatherings, or just a cozy moment, we want to see your best holiday season photos.

This challenge is open to photos taken at any time. Photos must be submitted by Saturday, December 7 (GMT).

Visit the challenge page to read the full rules and to submit your photos for consideration.

Enter your photos here

Also, don’t forget to check out some of the other open and upcoming photo challenges hosted by members of the DPReview community. Or, see some of the great photos from recently completed photo challenges.

Open challenges:

Upcoming challenges:



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

On this day 2003: we reviewed the world's first designed-for-digital SLR

Published

on

By

On this day 2003: we reviewed the world's first designed-for-digital SLR


The Olympus E-1 was the first DSLR designed solely for digital. The sensor format choice was independent of any film legacy and the lens design was specifically focused on the way digital sensors accept light. Leica’s S series of 45x30mm medium format DSLRs is the only comparable system we can recall.

It’s 21 years since we reviewed the Olympus E-1, arguably the only successful attempt to develop a digital SLR from first principles, rather than trying to adapt what had come before. As part of our 25th Anniversary celebrations, we look back at the E-1 as one of the most significant cameras of the past 25 years.

In the early days of digital photography the large number of photographers already heavily invested in film lenses put pressure on companies to continue their existing systems, even though ‘full-frame’ sensors that matched the film format they were designed around were prohibitively expensive for most photographers.

The Four Thirds system was an attempt at a clean slate design, with the intention of developing a new set of lenses designed to suit digital sensors, and built around a sensor chosen because it had a good performance-to-price ratio, not to match the arbitrary dimensions of cinema film stock adapted for photography in the early 1900s. It was a decision that would also allow smaller lenses, particularly at longer focal lengths.

The first open system: the Four Thirds timeline

The Four Thirds initiative was started by Kodak and Olympus, with the two companies settling on a 5MP Type 4/3 (17.3 x 13mm) CCD sensor. This sensor size and the use of the 4:3 aspect ratio common in most early digital sensors give the system its name.

They also announced it would be an open standard, with other companies welcome to join, a decision that prompted Fujifilm to announce its interest, followed by Sanyo, Sigma and Panasonic, some seventeen months later. For a while it looked like a critical mass might coalesce, finally bringing about the long dreamt-of common mount, allowing complete interoperability between multiple brands.

In the meantime, although later than the initially suggested Feb 2002 launch date, Olympus developed the E-1, a high-end magnesium alloy DSLR with a 100% viewfinder and that 5MP Four Thirds CCD at its heart. Announced alongside five lenses in mid 2003, the original press release highlights the ‘Supersonic Wave Filter’ sensor shake system that shook dust off the sensor as solving “a problem that has long been an Achilles heel of … digital SLRs.”

Unfortunately, in his review, Phil highlighted that the Olympus couldn’t offer either the speed or the resolution that were typically expected of a camera with the E-1’s stated professional ambitions. This was made more stark by its $2199 original price tag (albeit with a ‘street price’ well below that), at a time when Canon’s 6MP EOS 10D would set you back nearer $1500.

Olympus E-300 Four Thirds DSLR
It took the more affordable E-300 model for the Four Thirds to really find its audience. By the time the E-330 arrived, two years later, Kodak was out of the picture.

It took 2004’s 8MP E-300, with its much more attainable price point (around $1000 with kit lens) for Four Thirds to really find its audience.

By 2006 Panasonic and Leica were alongside Olympus spearheading the system, with each brand releasing variations of technologies co-developed by the two Japanese companies, including “Live MOS” sensors from Panasonic, rather than Kodak. The Olympus E-330 and Panasonic L-1/Leica Digilux 3 were some of the first DSLRs to offer live view, with the E-330 including a more sophisticated/complex implementation. You don’t have to squint very hard to see the beginnings of the first mirrorless camera, which Panasonic would introduce just two years later.

Despite a broadly sound initial concept, one challenge of the use of a smaller-than-film sensor in a DSLR was that the viewfinders were often quite small and dark (because the sensor size defines the size of the camera’s mirror, which in turn puts a limit on how large or bright you can make an optical viewfinder).

This was resolved with the move to a mirrorless design and the creation of the Micro Four Thirds system, built around the same Type 4/3 sensor format and a lot of technology developed during the Four Thirds era. Perhaps fittingly, the final Four Thirds camera was a direct continuation of the original E-1 line, with the system being officially discontinued 18 months later.

With this in mind, it might seem odd to call a system with a span of just over seven years between the launch of its first camera and its last a success, but I’d focus more on the groundwork it laid. Twenty-one years after the launch of the E-1, the Four Thirds sensor format is still very much with us, and you can trace a direct line from the first all-digital DSLR project to the mirrorless cameras that dominate the ILC market today, even if both Kodak and Olympus have now exited the photography market.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Cast your vote: Wildlife Photographer of the Year People's Choice Award

Published

on

By

Cast your vote: Wildlife Photographer of the Year People's Choice Award


Wildlife Photographer of the Year People’s Choice Award

A few weeks ago, The Natural History Museum, London, announced the winners of its 2024 Wildlife Photographer of the Year Awards for 2024. Now, it needs your help to select the winner of its 2024 Wildlife Photographer of the Year People’s Choice Award.

The 25 finalists for the People’s Choice Award were selected from 59,228 entries from 117 countries and territories. Members of the public can cast their vote for the award until January 29, and the winning image, along with four runners-up, will be announced in February. Here, we present the 25 finalists for this year’s award.

If you’re a wildlife photographer and want to enter your own images in the 2025 competition, you can find information on the competition’s website. However, act quickly: you have until December 5th to submit your images.

Wildlife Photographer of the Year is developed and produced by the Natural History Museum, London.

Wolf Pack

© Arvind Ramamurthy  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Wolf Pack by Arvind Ramamurthy, India

Members of an Indian wolf pack pause briefly as they play in fields in Bhigwan, India.

Indian wolves were once found all across India. Now, their number has dwindled to as few as 3,000. Living so close to humans poses many risks. Farming has fragmented their rolling grassland habitat, and feeding on cattle carcasses puts them at risk of disease. But Indian wolves are hardy animals. With better grassland management and protection, they could make a strong comeback. Arvind was photographing this pack playing in the grassy fields. One of them came and sat down at the edge of the agricultural crop, and one by one, four others joined it. They paused for a few seconds before they ran off again, playing and chasing one another.

Copyright Arvind Ramamurthy / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Icy Repose

© Sue Flood  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Icy Repose by Sue Flood, UK

A dramatic blue-grey sky highlights the soft greys of a Weddell seal as it rests on an ice floe.

Sue watched this Weddell seal from aboard a rigid inflatable boat in Neko Harbour of the Antarctic Peninsula. So as not to disturb its peaceful slumber, Sue used a long lens to record this serene portrait. Weddell seals’ large bodies are covered in a thick layer of blubber. This keeps them warm above and below the icy waters of the Southern Ocean.

Copyright Sue Flood / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

A Good Scratch

© Mark Williams  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

A Good Scratch by Mark Williams, UK/Canada

A beluga whale rubs its underside on a shallow river bottom to exfoliate its skin.

Mark took this image in a remote inlet along the Northwest Passage in the Canadian Arctic. Hundreds of beluga whales come here to socialize and exfoliate in the shallow water. The passage is also a safe haven, away from the predatory orcas. Belugas are extremely sociable mammals. They live, hunt and migrate together in pods that can range from quite small into the hundreds. Nicknamed ‘the canaries of the sea’, they produce a series of chirps, clicks, whistles and squeals that Mark found otherworldly.

Copyright Mark Williams / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Scanning the Realm

© Aaron Baggenstos  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Scanning the Realm by Aaron Baggenstos, USA

A puma stands on a windswept outcrop in the rugged mountain terrain of Torres del Paine National Park, Chile.

It is a symbol of hope. A successful conservation movement led to the creation of the national park and a rise in ecotourism in the region. This has also helped to reduce conflict between pumas and local gauchos (sheep farmers). The gauchos view pumas more positively because they’re attracting tourists, which is good for income. The introduction of sheepdogs has also helped. The dogs confront any approaching pumas and stop them attacking the sheep. In turn, the pumas hunt their natural prey, and the gauchos are less likely to shoot them. The change has been gradual but has gained momentum over the past 20 to 30 years. There is hope that humans and pumas can live alongside one another.

Copyright Aaron Baggenstos / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Aspen Shadows

© Devon Pradhuman  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Aspen Shadows by Devon Pradhuman, USA

Four grey wolves cross a minimalist landscape of naked aspens and snow in Yellowstone National Park, USA.

It was early spring in the Lamar Valley, and this pack was in search of its next meal. Watching from a distance, Devon saw them heading towards this patch of aspens and thought it would make a compelling image. The wolves walked right past these trees and then continued to follow the tree line, eventually disappearing over the hillside.

Copyright Devon Pradhuman / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Evening Song

© Christian Brinkmann  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Evening Song by Christian Brinkmann, Germany

A singing Eurasian songbird is silhouetted against a backdrop of colorful fairground lights in Münster, Germany.

During a popular fair in Münster called the Send, an interesting atmosphere arose behind the castle. The evening mood was gentle, and Christian had singing birds on one side and party music on the other. In front of the fairground lights, this Eurasian blackbird posed for its song. Although blackbirds are a common sight, Christian likes to photograph them in distinctive ways. Here, the silhouette of the bird set against a colorful backdrop gives the image an artistic flair.

Copyright Christian Brinkmann / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Sneak Attack

© Erlend Haarberg  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Sneak Attack by Erlend Haarberg, Norway

A polar bear cub attempts an underwater surprise attack on a northern fulmar.

In the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, a walrus carcass had attracted a female polar bear and her two cubs. But one of the cubs was more interested in playing in the water than eating. The cub was having fun diving under the water and resurfacing, playing with the seaweed and kelp. The northern fulmar resting on the surface of the water awakened the cub’s desire to hunt. Erlend watched as it attempted several underwater surprise attacks on the bird, only to fail each time. Play hunting like this is essential learning for a young bear. Eventually, it will have to survive in the Arctic without its mother.

Copyright Erlend Haarberg / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Slap Shot

© Savannah Rose  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Slap Shot by Savannah Rose, USA

A beaver cocks its tail before slapping it down on the water to alert its family to a newcomer.

Savannah enjoys photographing North American beavers in this pond in Jackson, Wyoming, USA. As she approached the shoreline, a beaver cruised cautiously by after emerging from its lodge. It cocked its tail up and brought it down with a resounding crack. Savannah had been trying to document this dramatic beaver behavior for years. Beavers use tail smacks to alert their family group to a newcomer. Despite the theatrics, beavers usually relax quickly after discovering the newcomer doesn’t pose a threat.

Copyright Savannah Rose / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Togetherness

© Ivan Ivanek  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Togetherness by Ivan Ivanek, Czech Republic

A striking pair of red-shanked douc langurs are seen mating in the forests of the Sơn Trà peninsula in Vietnam.

Known for their bright red ‘stockings’, these primates are found only in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. The species is critically endangered because of habitat loss, hunting and the illegal pet trade. After days observing the area, looking for evidence of the monkeys, Ivan managed to find a small group. Late one evening, he saw these two mating. Compared to other species of monkey he’d seen mating, it was an unexpectedly gradual and graceful affair!

Copyright Ivan Ivanek / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Concert in the Forest

© Vincent Premel  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Concert in the Forest by Vincent Premel, France

A Surinam golden-eyed tree frog puffs out its cheeks as it prepares to call for a mate.

The first rains come in French Guiana after a long dry spell. They’re a release for all wildlife, but especially for amphibians. When it rains, the ponds fill with water. Dozens of species descend from the canopy or come out of the ground. They’re here to lay their eggs in the water, in an event called ‘explosive breeding’. The density of individuals is hard to imagine. It made for a special night for Vincent, who is both a herpetologist and a photographer. The call of the Surinam golden-eyed tree frog is so powerful it can be heard hundreds of meters away.

Copyright Vincent Premel / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Snuffling Sengi

© Piotr Naskrecki  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Snuffling Sengi by Piotr Naskrecki, Poland

A rarely seen four-toed sengi forages for food among the leaf litter in Mozambique.

Sengis mainly eat insects and look for their prey at dusk and dawn. They rely on a combination of good vision and excellent sense of smell to find food. Piotr watched this sengi over several weeks in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique. It followed the same network of trails every day, looking for beetles and other tasty morsels among the leaf litter. Sengis are extremely shy and skittish, so Piotr set up a remote camera to photograph the little creature sniffing for food.

Copyright Piotr Naskrecki / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Whiteout

© Michel d’Oultremont  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Whiteout by Michel d’Oultremont, Belgium

A stoat sits up and observes its territory as it blends perfectly into a snowy landscape in Belgium.

Michel had been looking for stoats in the snow for many years. The magic of snowfall fascinates Michel every winter. He wanted to take a photograph that showed how the stoats blend in with the whiteness of the landscape. He’d seen a few in Switzerland but never in his native Belgium. Then, finally, his dream came true. He lay in the snow with a white camouflage net covering all but his lens. This curious stoat came out of its snowy hole and sat up from time to time, observing its territory just before setting off to hunt.

Copyright Michel d’Oultremont / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Earth and Sky

© Francisco Negroni  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Earth and Sky by Francisco Negroni, Chile

A double lenticular cloud is illuminated at nightfall by the lava emitted from the Villarrica volcano, Chile.

Villarica is in the town of Pucón in the south of Chile. It’s one of the country’s most active volcanoes, and last erupted in 2015. Francisco takes regular trips to Villarrica to monitor its activity. On this visit, he stayed nearby for 10 nights. He says every trip is “quite an adventure – never knowing what the volcano might surprise you with”. Some nights are calm, others furious, as in this photograph, where the brightness of the crater illuminates the night sky.

Copyright Francisco Negroni / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Fallen from the Sky

© Carlo D’Aurizio  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Fallen from the Sky by Carlo D’Aurizio, Italy

A collage of dead butterflies and moths trapped by the surface tension of the water floats in a stream in Italy.

It was a summer morning in the San Bartolomeo Valley in the Majella National Park, Italy. Carlo had visited this small stream many times. He expected to see the graceful flight of butterflies and dragonflies along it. He never thought he would find such a still life, a sad collage of dead insects calmly floating in the water. It hadn’t been particularly hot, and there hadn’t been any storms in the previous days. To this day, Carlo has no explanation of why the insects died.

Copyright Carlo D’Aurizio/ Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Spiked

© David Northall  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Spiked by David Northall, UK

A bloodied yet determined honey badger returns to finish off a Cape porcupine, which earlier had tried to defend itself.

Found throughout Botswana, honey badgers are famously ferocious. They often chase animals many times their own size. This honey badger got an unpleasant surprise when it attacked the normally nocturnal Cape porcupine. The badger grabbed the porcupine’s right leg. In defense, the porcupine repeatedly backed into its attacker, piercing it with many quills. During a lull in the attack, the porcupine managed to shuffle away, its leg badly damaged. After a short retreat, the bloodied badger returned. It finished off the porcupine under a bush close to the original attack, then dragged it into its underground den.

Copyright David Northall / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Unsold

© Jose Fragozo  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Unsold by Jose Fragozo, Portugal

A young cheetah cub hisses while waiting to be sold in Ethiopia.

Captured from her home plains in the Somali Region, she was transported for several days on the back of a camel to the northern coast of Somaliland. Illegal wildlife trafficking is a problem in the Somali Region. Farmers catch and sell cheetah cubs to traffickers, claiming that the cheetahs attack their livestock. Sometimes, the farmers and traffickers cannot sell the cubs immediately. The bigger the cheetahs get, the harder it is to find buyers. Some end up being killed and their parts sold, their bones shipped to Yemen and then to other Asian markets. They are then sold as tiger bones and used to make Chinese bone wine. After hissing at the camera, the cub started chirping, calling out for its mother.

Copyright Jose Fragozo / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Annoying Neighbor

© Bence Máté  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Annoying Neighbour by Bence Máté, Hungary

A European roller defends its territory from a bemused-looking little owl in Kiskunság National Park, Hungary.

The little owl and the European roller are very different birds, but their nests and feeding requirements are similar. This means they sometimes breed near each other. The male roller makes a sport of annoying other birds that stray into its breeding area during the short mating season. It makes a surprise ambush, flying at full speed behind them. To catch such a fleeting scene, Bence spent 27 days watching from a hide. The little owl seemed nonplussed by the spectacle.

Copyright Bence Máté/ Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Curious Connection

© Nora Milligan  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Curious Connection by Nora Milligan, USA

A chimpanzee pauses and looks down as its family moves across the forest floor of Loango National Park, Gabon.

On a trek through the forest, Nora’s guide signaled for the group to stop near the bank of a swamp. They heard the call of a chimp first, then the leaves around them started to rustle and a group of chimpanzees appeared. This family is called the Rekambo group. A group of researchers from the Ozouga Chimpanzee Project is studying them. Nora couldn’t believe her luck when they started to climb the nearby trees. As she peered through her viewfinder, a large male paused and looked down at them. The chimp craned its neck forward and its eyes seemed to widen, as if to get a better look.

Copyright Nora Milligan / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Meeting in the Marsh

© Michael Forsberg  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Meeting in the Marsh by Michael Forsberg, USA

A disguised biologist approaches an endangered whooping crane in Louisiana, USA.

Michael has been chronicling the lives of endangered whooping cranes since early 2019. The biologist acted with cat-like quickness to check the bird’s health and change a transmitter that was no longer working. The transmitter helps biologists track these non-migratory birds and learn more about them. This experimental population was reintroduced in Bayou Country in 2011. In the 1940s there were roughly 20 whooping cranes in the region. Since then, numbers have climbed to over 800.

Copyright Michael Forsberg / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

The Brave Gecko

© Willie Burger van Schalkwyk  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

The Brave Gecko by Willie Burger van Schalkwyk, South Africa

A giant ground gecko stands fast against a pale chanting goshawk in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, South Africa.

One hunting strategy of the southern pale chanting goshawk is to walk or run on the ground in pursuit of prey. Willie watched as the little lizard put up a brave fight against its large attacker. Unfortunately, there was no hope of survival, but Willie was impressed by the gecko’s bravery.

Copyright Willie Burger van Schalkwyk / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Forest Dreams

© Samuel Bloch  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Forest of Dreams by Samuel Bloch, France

A northern giant petrel sits on its nest at the edge of a rātā tree forest on Enderby Island, New Zealand.

Northern giant petrels are large seabirds. They’re used to flying above the waves for weeks without encountering land. Samuel was surprised to find this one in such a woody environment. Like many other seabirds, it breeds on islands where there are fewer predators. Samuel took this image from a distance and left quickly to avoid disturbing the bird.

Copyright Samuel Bloch / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Edge of Night

© Jess Findlay  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Edge of Night by Jess Findlay, Canada

A ghostly barn owl exits the hayloft window of a derelict barn to hunt fields outside Vancouver, Canada.

Combining high-speed and long-exposure photography in a single exposure required a technical setup. First, Jess quietly watched the owl for several nights to understand its habits and plan the shot. He then set up an invisible beam that would trigger a flash when the owl flew out of the barn. Simultaneously, a slow shutter speed gathered ambient light cast on the clouds and barn to complete the scene. On the tenth night, all the moving parts came together as the owl left to begin his hunt.

Copyright Jess Findlay / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

No Access

© Ian Wood  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

No Access by Ian Wood, UK

An ambling Eurasian badger appears to glance up at badger graffiti on a quiet road in St Leonards-on-Sea, England, UK.

Residents had been leaving food scraps on the pavement for foxes. But Ian noticed that badgers from a nearby sett were also coming to forage. After seeing a badger walking along the pavement by this wall late one night, he decided to photograph it. He set up a small hide on the edge of the road to take his picture. Only the light from a lamppost illuminated the creature as it ambled along, seemingly glancing up at the badger graffiti just in front of it.

Copyright Ian Wood / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Drifting Dinner

© Noam Kortler  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Drifting Dinner by Noam Kortler, Israel

A decorator crab perches on top of a sea squirt to comb the water for drifting plankton.

Noam took this photograph during a night dive off Komodo Island, Indonesia. The sea squirt provided the crab with the perfect stage to feed on drifting plankton. The crab had camouflaged and armed itself with tiny hydroids known as Tubularia. These can sting other animals and so helped protect the crab from predators. Noam watched the crab gracefully search for food, illuminated by the camera flash as if in a spotlight center stage.

Copyright Noam Kortler / Wildlife Photographer of the Year

The Arrival

© Brad Leue  Wildlife Photographer of the Year

The Arrival by Brad Leue, Australia

Floodwaters that have traveled for months surge towards an enormous salt lake in South Australia.

Kati Thanda-Lake Eyre is Australia’s largest inland lake and one of the world’s largest salt lakes. Photographing from a helicopter in strong winds was quite a challenge for Brad. As well as the floodwaters, a dust storm was blowing and rain was falling on the horizon. Floodwaters had traveled more than 1,000 kilometers (1,600 miles). They’d surged steadily from Queensland towards South Australia. Timing was imperative to photograph this once-in-a-decade natural event. Brad’s image shows the water channeling steadily down Warburton Groove. This is the final stretch before entering the mighty lake. On their journey, the waters bring new life to this remarkable desert system and its rare and threatened wildlife.

Copyright Brad Leue / Wildlife Photographer of the Year



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending