Connect with us

Camera

One thing: Taking stock of gear and when to let go or lean in

Published

on

One thing: Taking stock of gear and when to let go or lean in


If you’re not careful, it’s easy to get caught up in acquiring a lot of gear and chasing the next new shiny object. Rather than specs, what if we looked at our habits and what we enjoy photographing? Doing this might reveal what you really need to buy instead of what you think you want to buy.

Image credit: Shaminder Dulai

This isn’t a story about new gear. This isn’t a story about the latest shiny new camera with a breathless rundown of specs and features. This story will not convince you to go out and buy the trendy thing. No, this story will ask you to rethink how you think about new gear, and I will ask you not to look to others to decide what you should buy but to look inward to yourself.

One Thing: Advice, tips and tricks from the DPReview editors

About this series:
Our team cuts through the noise to share the things that made the biggest impact on our work and what lessons you can bring into your own work.

Read the entire series here.

I’ve been thinking about how and why we buy and upgrade gear. It’s easy to get caught up in chasing the next shiny object, and before you know it, you’ve amassed a large cache of equipment, or worse, you’re the person who is always selling their gear to buy the next one and not actually using any of it. Recently, I’ve been hearing from many former colleagues in the photojournalism world with questions about global shutter and the Sony a9 III. (Before joining DPReview, I spent decades as a working photojournalist, photo editor and video producer.)

It may surprise you, but many professional photojournalists are still using DSLRs. So when a handful of people started to independently ask me if now was the moment to go mirrorless finally and if the a9 III was going to be the camera to trigger the change, it got me thinking about how often the professionals upgrade, what I learned to value and the lessons I learned the hard way.

“Instead of looking at what’s new or comparing yourself to what you don’t have, why not look at what you do have in a new light?”

Making a living from photography and video changes how you think about gear and the purchases you make (or have to convince your employer to make). In that world, getting new gear was a luxury that involved budget requests months to years in advance and a lot of begging and pleading. Or, during my freelance years, saving up for months or years. In that environment, you embrace the gear you have and learn how to squeeze out the most from it.

Need versus want

That scarcity teaches you the value of carefully considering what you ‘needed’ versus ‘wanted.’ During this time, I learned that what I ‘wanted’ may be the shiny new thing, but what I really ‘needed’ was an 50mm F1.8 workhorse to replace my aging 50mm F4.5.

You may have similar realizations as you embark on this exercise. Do you actually need a longer telephoto, or would you be better served by a 2x teleconverter? Your back and bank account will thank you.

A drone may seem appealing, but the better investment may be a monopod to help make more steady shots from the ground.

I’m just as guilty as the next fellow in getting excited about some shiny new gear and its whiz-bang new features that promise to change my visual life for the better. Case in point, when I was just a few years into working for daily newspapers, I had convinced myself that my photography was being held back by not having a wider angle lens. I had a 24-35mm lens but coveted an 11-24mm lens for some reason. I thought of all the fantastic images I could produce (and be hired to produce) if only I had this wider lens. A few years later, I finally got my hands on one and then proceeded to make some of my worst pictures.

It wasn’t the lens’s fault; it was my fault for thinking this gear would magically gel with me and make me better. The truth was, I should have invested in a faster 24-35mm (which I eventually did and still use today), but I was so enamored with the novelty of the 11mm that I forgot to ask if it was the right lens for the work I was doing (it was not).

This is a lesson I took some time to learn.

I’ve downsized over the years, and today, I can head out for 75% of assignments with items that fit in just one bag. Turns out I didn’t ‘need’ as much fancy gear as I once thought.

Image credit: Shaminder Dulai

Look at your kit with fresh eyes

It’s fun to look at new gear and debate what to buy next, but let’s not lose sight of the gear we already have by our side. Look at what you have with fresh eyes. Are there things you use often and might benefit from getting a newer version? Are there things everyone says you must have (e.g., a ring light) but don’t really jibe with your goals? Instead of looking at what’s new or comparing yourself to what you don’t have, why not look at what you do have in a new light?

“It’s fun to look at new gear and debate what to buy next, but let’s not lose sight of the gear we already have by our side.”

I am of the opinion that it’s not necessary to upgrade often, and only by running our current gear into the ground can we learn what we like, need or would enjoy using next. This experience guides us through experimenting, trial and error, and ultimately, it’s only when we hit a roadblock that we genuinely know what purchase will make the most positive impact on our photography. By gaining a better appreciation of what we have and considering what gives us joy and spurs us to get out there to make some images, we’ll discover the things that matter.

Three steps to better (photographic) living

With a nod to Marie Kondo, I propose we ask the most obvious question, “Does this give me joy?” And then, for good measure, I’ll tack on, “Does this motivate my creativity?”

I propose we shift our thinking on gear, invest in what helps drive your creativity and growth in photography, and don’t worry so much about having the latest gear. And then, let’s use this rubric to guide us in when and what to buy next. To help us get started, I suggest we look at all our gear and place everything into one of three categories: ‘stuff I don’t use,’ ‘stuff I use often,’ and ‘stuff I’d like to use.’

Stuff I don’t use

The tricky bit with this one is needing to be honest with yourself and asking if you are still using stuff you have. Over the years, I know I’ve accumulated gear that either didn’t deliver as promised, I never got around to using, or I’ve grown past needing it.

“Use the stuff; don’t just buy the stuff.”

It’s time to let this stuff go. As a bonus, while clearing up space, it’s also an excellent time to examine what you value in your photography and why you never used or outgrew part of your kit. This self-examination may reveal what you ‘need’ next.

Don’t just throw your old gear in the rubbish bin. Consider selling or donating your unused gear. If you think your gear can still fetch a pretty sum, it makes sense to sell your unused gear to help fund your next purchase. Or, bypass the hassle of selling and donate your unused gear to a younger photographer.

Used gear is how I got my chance to get my foot in the door, and it’s a great way to pass down your passion for photography to others. My first real usable professional camera was the Canon EOS-1D Mark II, donated to me by co-workers at a newspaper. That camera set me down my path and I’m still grateful over a decade later. The newsroom was upgrading staff to the ‘N,’ so it could have just as easily thrown away the older camera, but by gifting it to someone in need, it had a purpose for a few more years.

A donated Canon EOS-1D Mark II became my daily shooter for years, taking me coast to coast across the US on assignments ranging from sports to documentary projects. It had over 200K shutter actuations, an unreliable battery door, and I’m pretty sure it had spent time embedded in the Iraq War, but I loved it, and it helped me get started.

Stuff I use often

In our kits, there are workhorse items that we take for granted. A medium zoom kit lens isn’t ‘sexy’, but if we think about it, it’s where many of us started, and it’s a focal length still heavily used and practical for many uses. Instead of lusting after a very lovely 85mm F1.2 prime, how about upgrading your 18-35mm F4 zoom lens to a 16-35mm F2.8 zoom lens? Which would you get a lot more use out of?

“Do you actually need a longer telephoto, or would you be better served by a 2x teleconverter? Your back and bank account will thank you.”

You could start by looking at what you’re using. What have you worn out? What are the things you love that you currently own? Are better versions worth upgrading to? If you started with a DSLR, maybe it makes more sense to look at your most used DSLR lens and replace it with the better mirrorless version before chasing the halo products.

Stuff I’d like to use

As you move through this organization process, you’ll no doubt have a few items that you don’t use enough today but have always wanted to. For some stuck in an annual upgrade cycle, this could even mean your primary camera.

It’s time to do something with what you have. Use the stuff; don’t just buy the stuff.

Get out there and make some images. Take your camera everywhere and challenge yourself to make one image weekly (or daily). Create a personal project documenting your family, friends, pets, garden or how light rakes across your yard over the year (it worked for Claude Monet).

If you’re low on ideas, here are three challenges I’d like to offer to get you started.

“If you’re low on ideas, here are three challenges I’d like to offer to get you started.”

One: What do you care about? Make a list of 10 items and then narrow it down to one. For 30 days, make one image a day that illustrates the idea you care about most. You don’t need to show it to anyone; this is for you to develop a practice for image making and using the tools you own to be creative.

Two: The alphabet game. Each day, take a walk and find an image in the world that looks like a letter. Do one letter a day for 26 days, and by the end, you’ll see the letter C in the curl of laundry rolling in the dryer, the letter J in highway onramps, and the letter Z in leaf patterns on house plants. It’s a great way to start seeing the world from another angle, develop composition and framing techniques and have a completed project to inspire your next one.

Three: The DPReview photo challenges are a great place to share work, find community and have some fun. These are meant just for fun (there’s no prize other than bragging rights). DPReview members can view work, vote for winners, or host challenges. Join the fun and start sharing your work, or get inspired to try new tricks with old gear.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Pentax K-1 and K-1 II firmware updates include astrophotography features (depending on where you live)

Published

on

By

Pentax K-1 and K-1 II firmware updates include astrophotography features (depending on where you live)


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Yesterday, Ricoh quietly released firmware 2.50 for its Pentax K-1 and K-1 II DSLRs. However, the features you can expect to gain from this update may depend on your geography.

Ricoh’s English-language firmware pages for the K-1 and K-1 II state that firmware 2.50 delivers “Improved stability for general performance.”

However, astute Pentax users noted that Ricoh’s Japanese-language firmware pages (translation) indicate that the update also includes a limited feature called “Astronomical Photo Assist,” a collection of three new features designed for astrophotography: Star AF, remote control focus fine adjustment, and astronomical image processing.

Star AF is intended to automate focusing on stars when using autofocus lenses. Rather than manually focusing on a bright star and changing your composition, it promises to let you compose your shot and let the camera focus.

Remote control fine adjustment allows users to adjust focus without touching the lens and requires Pentax’s optional O-RC1 remote. Astronomical image processing will enable users to make in-camera adjustments to astrophotography images, including shading correction, fogging correction, background darkness, star brightness, celestial clarity, and fringe correction.

Astronomical image processing on the K-1 and K-1 II will enable users to make in-camera adjustments to astrophotography images, including shading correction, fogging correction, background darkness, star brightness, celestial clarity, and fringe correction.

According to Ricoh, Astronomical Photo Assist is a premium feature that must be purchased and costs ¥11,000 for an activation key (about $70 at current exchange rates).

Although these astrophotography features appear to be Japan-only for now, a Ricoh representative tells us, “Ricoh Imaging Americas confirmed that the premium firmware features for the PENTAX K-1 and PENTAX K-1 Mark II will eventually be available to US customers.”

Firmware update 2.50 for both the K-1 and K-1 II is available for download from Ricoh’s website.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850

Published

on

By

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

As part of our twenty fifth anniversary, we’re looking back at some of the most significant cameras launched and reviewed during that period. Today’s pick was launched seven years ago today* and yet we’re only quite recently stepping out of its shadow.

The Nikon D850 is likely to be remembered as the high watermark of DSLR technology. We may yet still see impressive developments from Ricoh in the future (we’d love to see a significantly upgraded Pentax K-1 III), but the D850 was perhaps the green flash as the sun set on the DSLR as the dominant technology in the market.

Click here to read our Nikon D850 review

Why do we think it was such a big deal? Because it got just about everything right. Its 45MP sensor brought dual conversion gain to high pixel count sensors, meaning excellent dynamic range at base ISO and lower noise at high ISOs. Its autofocus system was one of the best we’ve ever seen on a DSLR: easy to use and highly dependable, with a good level of coverage. And then there was a body and user interface honed by years of iterative refinement, that made it easy to get the most out of the camera.

None of this is meant as a slight towards the other late-period DSLRs but the likes of Canon’s EOS 5DS and 5DSR didn’t present quite such a complete package of AF tracking, daylight DR and low-light quality as the Nikon did. With its ability to shoot at up to 9fps (if you used the optional battery grip), the D850 started to chip away at the idea that high megapixel cameras were specialized landscape and studio tools that would struggle with movement or less-than-perfect lighting. And that’s without even considering its 4K video capabilities.

In the seven years since the D850 was launched, mirrorless cameras have eclipsed most areas in which DSLRs once held the advantage. For example, the Z8 can shoot faster, autofocus more with more accuracy and precision, across a wider area of the frame and do so while shooting at much faster rates.

But, even though it outshines the D850 in most regards, the Z8 is still based around what we believe is a (significant) evolution of the same sensor, and its reputation still looms large enough for Nikon to explicitly market the Z8 as its “true successor.”

Nikon D850 sample gallery

Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

*Actually seven years ago yesterday: we had to delay this article for a day to focus on the publishing the Z6III studio scene: the latest cameras taking precedence over our anniversary content.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear

Published

on

By

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Photo: Richard Butler

We’ve just received a production Nikon Z6III and took it into our studio immediately to get a sense for how the sensor really performs.

Dynamic range tests have already been conducted, but these only give a limited insight into the image quality as a whole. As expected, our Exposure Latitude test – which mimics the effect of reducing exposure to capture a bright sunrise or sunset, then making use of the deep shadows – shows a difference if you use the very deepest shadows, just as the numerical DR tests imply.

Likewise, our ISO Invariance test shows there’s more of a benefit to be had from applying more amplification by raising the ISO setting to overcome the read noise, than there was in the Z6 II. This means there’s a bigger improvement when you move up to the higher gain step of the dual conversion gain sensor but, as with the Z6 II, little more to be gained beyond that.

These are pushing at the extreme of the sensor’s performance though. For most everyday photography, you don’t use the deepest shadows of the Raw files, so differences in read noise between sensors don’t play much of a role. In most of the tones of an image, sensor size plays a huge role, along with any (pretty rare) differences in light capturing efficiency.

Image Comparison
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

As expected, the standard exposures look identical to those of the Z6 II. There are similar (or better) levels of detail at low ISO, in both JPEG and Raw. At higher ISO, the Z6III still looks essentially the same as the Z6II. Its fractionally higher level of read noise finally comes back to have an impact at very, very high ISO settings.

Overall, then, there is a read noise price to be paid for the camera’s faster sensor, in a way that slightly blunts the ultimate flexibility of the Raw files at low ISO and that results in fractionally more noise at ultra-high ISOs. But we suspect most people will more than happily pay this small price in return for a big boost in performance.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending