Connect with us

Camera

Ricoh’s big bet on a film renaissance: We interview the team behind the upcoming Pentax film camera

Published

on

Ricoh’s big bet on a film renaissance: We interview the team behind the upcoming Pentax film camera


Interview participants (all with Ricoh Imaging Company, Ltd.)
Second from Right: Tomoki Tanaka, General Manager, Pentax Division Others, left to right:
Kazuhiko Shibuya, Pentax Division, Business Management Department, Overseas Sales Section
Hiraku Kawauchi, Marketing Group, Marketing Communication Department
Takeo (“TKO”) Suzuki, Designer, Pentax Division
Ryutaro Aratama, Group Leader, Overseas Sales Section, Business Management Department

Everything analog is suddenly cool again, and photography is no exception: There’s an incredible renaissance happening in film photography, led by a generation who grew up never knowing anything other than digital cameras.

The growth has been explosive by any measure; on a recent tour of used-camera stores in Tokyo, owners consistently told me that they’re seeing about 3x the level of film camera sales now compared to pre-pandemic times. More remarkable is that I don’t think I saw any customer older than 40 in any of the mainstream shops I visited.

Old cameras are just that, though: old. They may or may not work, and if they stop working, the only option is usually to fork out for another one. Wouldn’t it be great if there were a brand-new film camera with a warranty and service available?

That’s exactly what the Pentax division of Ricoh Imaging has been thinking, led by a passionate young designer, Takeo “TKO” Suzuki, the designer who first had the idea of Pentax developing a new film camera, with the full support of Pentax’s General Manager, Tomoki Tanaka.

In this recent YouTube video, designer Takeo “TKO” Suzuki discusses some of the design choices on the upcoming Pentax film camera.

The project has been ongoing, albeit largely under wraps, since late 2022, but Pentax revealed the following details about the camera in an announcement and a YouTube video where TKO went into more depth on March 1 this year:

  • The project is going forward; the camera will ship sometime this summer
  • Compact design with a half-frame format (2x the exposures on a 35mm roll)
  • Manual film advance and rewind
  • Vertical image format
  • A wide-angle fixed lens
  • Zone focusing
  • Mostly automatic exposure, but with “shooting modes” for user control

I was in Tokyo when the announcement was made and managed to interview Tanaka, TKO and team members about a week later. We covered Tanaka’s vision for Pentax going forward, as well as many details about the camera itself. Here’s how that went, with some slight paraphrasing on my part for clarity:

Ricoh Imaging’s vision for the Pentax brand

Dave Etchells: What’s your vision for the Pentax brand? What do you see as your unique place in the market, and how do you plan to leverage that going forward? What do you see as the relationship between film and digital products, say, five years from now?

Tomoki Tanaka: Our vision is to offer products to photography enthusiasts; that’s the main point. Photography doesn’t just mean digital cameras or analog cameras, though, but both. As of today, we don’t know the future of these categories, but it’s clear that film camera use has been increasing in recent years. Five or ten years from now, there might be new technology that will change everything, so it’s hard to say that far in the future. We believe that both digital and analog cameras will be available though. Some people prefer digital, some people prefer analog, and some may like both. Our mission, our vision, is based on user demand; we always try to offer products to users based on their demand.

We, of course, can’t speak for other manufacturers, but so far, we are the only one to have the potential to offer both analog and digital to the users. That is our vision for now: whether they are film or digital users, we want to be able to serve the enthusiasts.

“Our mission, our vision, is based on user demand; we always try to offer products to users based on their demand.”

The biggest surprise in the latest announcement about the Pentax Film Camera is that it will use a half-frame format with vertically-oriented frames on 35mm film.Photo: Ashley Pomeroy, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

The future of film cameras

Dave Etchells: I know you can’t read the minds of your competitors, but I think there’s going to be a very robust market for new film cameras, given the high level of interest, especially with the Millennials and Gen-Zs. Do you think other companies might enter the market for advanced compact film cameras once you’ve demonstrated success?

Takeo “TKO” Suzuki [TKO]: Yes, we don’t know the situations of our competitors, but we expect that some will enter the film market. We even hope that what we are doing will stimulate the market overall. The analog photography industry is supported by many people with great dedication to it. It’s wonderful to have such people, and we’d like to support them as a camera manufacturer. It’s very difficult to try to do that only by ourselves, though, so we hope we can do it together with other manufacturers to pass on the film culture to the next generation.

“We want to be a pioneer, but we don’t want to be alone.”

Dave Etchells: Ah – as they say, a rising tide floats all ships; if you can get other companies to participate, that would be good for you, too, vs just having a monopoly.

Tomoki Tanaka: We want to be a pioneer, but we don’t want to be alone.

Making the new film camera a reality

Dave Etchells: For a long while, you weren’t sure that it would even be possible to manufacture a new film camera, but you announced just a week before our meeting that you’ve firmly decided the project is feasible and you’re going ahead with it. When was that decision finally reached, and what was the last piece of the puzzle that made you realize it was possible?

TKO: It was when we were able to create a prototype, and I could take a picture with it. I didn’t expect that anyone would give us the OK to proceed with this project without a first shot actually being made by the prototype, so that was the moment. I was very moved when I was able to take the first picture with the prototype. It even brought tears to my eyes.

“I was very moved when I was able to take the first picture with the prototype. It even brought tears to my eyes.”

Dave Etchells: I can imagine; you’d had a dream, and finally, it was in your hands.

TKO: A dream, yes.

Dave Etchells: It must have been a lot of work to build the prototype – and you had to have a lens for it. Did you just take an existing lens that you had and kind of hack it together into something for the sake of a test?

TKO: It’s newly designed for this project specifically. We, of course, referred to other cameras’ lens designs, but we didn’t just use an old one as it was; we redesigned it. To make the prototype, we had to make a whole new lens just to be able to build one prototype camera. We actually didn’t have the necessary equipment or molds to rebuild old designs, so we had to start over from scratch.

Dave Etchells: Wow, that’s a big investment to make, just to decide if the project would be possible or not.

TKO: Yes, it was a lot.

The new film camera will carry the Pentax brand, a famous name in photo history. In 1957, the Asahi Pentax (AKA the Asahi Pentax AP) arguably kicked off the SLR boom. Some aspects of its design became industry standards, including its rapid-wind film advance lever, film-rewind crank, instant mirror return and microprism focusing aids on the viewfinder screen.

Photo: Andriy Matusevich, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Pentax vs Ricoh branding

Dave Etchells: Part of the announcement was that the camera will carry the Pentax branding. How did you decide on that? I was kind of expecting to see the Ricoh name used, given that the GR series has more of a compact rangefinder feel to it than current Pentax models.

TKO: Actually, this was simply because we considered this product to be a Pentax brand product from the very beginning; we simply started working on it as a Pentax project and announced it as the Pentax Film Camera Project in December of 2022.

You mentioned the Ricoh Auto Half when we were talking earlier – We didn’t start off thinking of it as a half-frame camera. That’s why we only just now declared that it will be half-frame format; we decided to do that during the process, but we didn’t have the Ricoh Auto Half in our minds in the beginning.

“We considered this product to be a Pentax brand product from the very beginning.”

Dave Etchells: Ah, so you actually started out thinking in terms of full-frame and only later turned to half-frame when the idea of making it vertical-format came about.

TKO: Yes, we only decided on half-frame later. When we made the first announcement in December 2022, we didn’t have any such details yet. We communicated with the market [and that led us to the idea of vertical format and half-frame].

Dave Etchells: I like that. It’s a story about having a vision for a product but then talking to the market to refine it. I’ve always appreciated that about the Film Project; you’ve gotten very close to the users to see what they actually want.

Incorporating feedback from film photographers

Dave Etchells: Before we talk about some of the details you just announced, what was the most surprising thing you discovered as the concept developed?

TKO: It was the fact that we have so many friends and supporters in the analog world. There were many, many more than we expected, so we were very surprised. We were very moved by how cooperative they were and how much they wanted to help with our project. It was also very encouraging to have a sense of such camaraderie that we’re not alone in doing this. There are many many supporters, that’s very encouraging.

Tomoki Tanaka: There were many strong friendships that contributed. Once we had an opportunity to talk with someone for example, they would introduce us to the next person, and the next and the next. ‘Film’ people have many connections, and everyone has been so cooperative. So their friendliness, their connections … I don’t know if that’s a good English word. The connections and relationships with each other really increased our opportunities to talk with analog camera people.

The used film camera market is red hot right now. The owner of Used Camera Box in Shinjuku (Mr Tanaka, above) told me he’s getting 100+ customers per day, 80% from outside Japan. (Stay tuned for an upcoming article on used-camera shopping in Tokyo.)Photo: Dave Etchells

Dave Etchells: I can imagine that. Film shooters are a very passionate, supportive and close-knit group. For a manufacturer to come along and say, “Hey, we’re with you, we’re going to make this happen,” it’s very powerful; I can see it really being embraced.

TKO: We receive comments directly through our distribution channel, and also via SMS comments [phone texts]. We watch these comments every day and try to understand what they’re thinking. But we were also surprised that many comments were from overseas countries, not just Japan.

Dave Etchells: It was interesting to me as I was touring the used camera stores here that first, I don’t think I saw a single customer over the age of 40 the whole time, except in some of the small, very collector-oriented shops. Secondly, there were a huge number of foreigners from all over the world. One shop owner said that 80% of his customers are from other countries. So as strong as the interest is in Japan, it might be even more in other countries.

Tomoki Tanaka: It’s just a guess, but maybe it’s that there’s demand outside of Japan, but the product is available here [so that’s why there are so many foreigners hunting for film cameras here.]

Dave Etchells: Yeah, there’s really nowhere in the US where you can go and put hands on remotely as many cameras as you can here in Tokyo. There’s a large used-gear dealer in Atlanta (KEH) that has perhaps 500 film bodies on hand and another in Portland, Oregon (Blue Moon Camera) that has a similar number in stock, but only people who live nearby can visit either one, and you can probably find 5-10x as many bodies just in Shinjuku.

Ryutaro Aratama: I’ve heard that some camera fans from overseas countries first stop in Shinjuku and find a favorite camera, then go to Kyoto or Osaka or for another trip.

Dave Etchells: Ah yes – I came across a couple of stories exactly like that, just among the people I met. One person was buying a camera and a couple of lenses before going to Kyoto to shoot with them. It’s nice to see people using old cameras again; it’s like they’re still loved and they still have a place.

I’d never given a second thought to cranking a film-advance lever, but the moment TKO mentioned it, it brought a flood of memories. So many moments in my life are connected through that quick flick of a finger. I dug out an old and battered family K-1000 to pose for this shot.

Photo: Dave Etchells

Sweating the little details

Dave Etchells: Some design choices seemed obvious to me, while others were quite surprising. I immediately loved the idea of mechanical film advance and rewind, but TKO mentioned that this approach was more costly. What makes a manual mechanism more expensive, and can you give us a rough idea of how much more it costs to make a fully mechanical system?

TKO: At this moment, we cannot disclose any figures, but it is true that to have a mechanical film winding means the number of parts, such as screws or gears, is many more than with an electrical system. So it’s more difficult to assemble, and it needs more training, much more training, even for experienced assembly workers. It’s not just the parts cost itself, but everything around it takes more time and money. Despite the fact that it costs more, though, we decided to equip the camera with a mechanical system because we believe that one of the fun parts of using a film camera is winding the film. I really wanted to make that happen and deliver it to the users, our target users.

[Author’s note: There aren’t just more parts, but they have to be strong enough for people to crank on them, applying much more force than a tiny electric motor would. This adds cost as well.]

The Ricoh Auto Half first debuted around 1960, and a whole range of variants were sold through the 1970s. It featured a 25mm F2.8 lens (equivalent to 36mm on a full-frame camera). The optical design of the lens in the coming Pentax Film Camera draws its optical heritage from the Pentax Espio Mini, but the angle of view was inspired by the Ricoh Auto Half.

Photo: Hiyotada, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The logic behind going vertical

Dave Etchells: The choice of a vertical format was a real surprise to me. Once TKO explained it in the video, though, I was like, “Well, of course!”. Was this a decision you made very early in the project, or was it a point you arrived at only after a while?

Tomoki Tanaka: I believe it wasn’t openly discussed, but it was in his [TKO’s] mind from the beginning. He needed to carefully study whether it would really be suitable for young users these days or if it would be accepted by the market, so he spent a lot of time interviewing knowledgeable people and potential users. He received a lot of great advice and very helpful information.

Dave Etchells: So you found people liked the idea? I’ve never used a half-frame camera, but I expect it will be a shift for older photographers like me to think of vertical format for everything. You found that both older and younger thought it was a good idea, though?

TKO: We were afraid at first that long-time analog users wouldn’t like the idea of half-frame. After the YouTube video, though, many older people say they understand the concept, saying “we know that this camera is for young people.”

Dave Etchells: Even though I’m an “old person,” this is a camera I would buy and think about starting up my darkroom again for. I like the idea that it immediately cuts processing costs in half for users. I don’t know if labs are set up to print half frames separately, but even if printed two up it would probably be fine. (In fact, it could even be a storytelling component, where you would take pairs of pictures that you wanted to see together.

These shots of Japanese actress and model Riko taken with a Ricoh Auto Half show how the half-frame format looks as a standard 4×6 print. The new Pentax Film camera will have about the same angle of view and perspective.

Photo: BARFOUT, Copyright © Brown’s Books, all rights reserved, used with permission

Dave Etchells: This is a bit the same question over again, but the idea of a vertical frame and half-frame 35mm format go hand in hand. Did half-frame drive the idea of vertical format, or was it the other way around?

TKO: I myself shoot with a smartphone every day, so using vertical format is a very normal everyday activity for me. One day I was using a half-frame camera, looking through its viewfinder at a small street with traditional Japanese buildings, and I realized how well they fit in a vertical frame. It was really refreshing to be able to see a vertical composition, not on a smartphone but in a viewfinder.

Tomoki Tanaka: Actually, in the old days, even after we had smartphones, people would take pictures with them this way. [Gestures, showing a horizontal format.] But now, everyone just takes pictures in the vertical. The times have changed, and we have to follow.

Historically, photography was always this way [horizontal], maybe because of our … can I say eyes? But now, people are seeing pictures on their smartphones… Maybe in the future, movies will be vertical too, made for smartphones.

The Pentax Espio Mini was sold in the US as the Pentax UC-1. Its 32mm f/3.5 lens was highly regarded for its sharpness, contrast and overall image quality, despite its simple 3-element triplet design. The new Pentax Film Camera will use a newly designed but similar triplet arrangement.

Photo: Butkus.org camera manual site, used with permission

Lens details

Dave Etchells: You said that the lens was inspired by the field of view of the Auto Half models and the optical design of the Pentax Espio Mini’s lens. How were the optical designs of those two camera lines different, and what sort of design did the Espio have that you’ve brought forward?

TKO: So, to confirm, we referenced the Espio’s lens design, not the Auto Half’s; it was just the angle of view of the Auto Half that we followed, not the design itself. [Editor’s note: The Auto Half featured a 25mm lens, equivalent to 36mm on a full-frame camera, but Pentax declined to state a specific number for the new camera’s lens.]

I thought that the natural angle of view when looking through the viewfinder of a Ricoh Auto Half is very suitable for everyone, for everyday use. The Espio Mini was a famous compact film camera that had many fans. We decided to use the Espio Mini lens as a reference because of its high-quality image; even the R&D people rated it very highly. We can also apply the latest technology coatings to it; I think it has the potential to become a modern masterpiece.

“The [Pentax] Espio Mini was a famous compact film camera that had many fans. We decided to use the Espio Mini lens as a reference because of its high-quality image.”

Dave Etchells: This is sort of a technical detail, but can you tell me how many elements were in the Espio lens, and are you using the same number in the new one?

TKO: The Espio Mini’s lens is a triplet, a very simple lens system with just three elements. It’s very simple, but our engineers tried it and got very good results. It’s beautiful with just the triplet, very natural and very clear, so we optimized the triplet. The lens on the Espio Mini was very nice; this new lens is a new design but it’s very similar.

Dave Etchells: So the new lens is a triplet also?

TKO: For right now, we’ll just refer you to the Espio Mini’s triplet lens construction. The Espio Mini was a full-frame camera though, so we had to do some refining to adjust to the half-frame format.

Zone focusing

Dave Etchells: TKO mentioned in the video that the camera would have zone focusing rather than a continuous range. Is this only the case for manual focus, or is it true for autofocus as well? If the latter, isn’t there a potential loss of sharpness for subjects at distances between the discrete settings? [Author’s note: Think of zone focus settings in terms of close-up, portrait or landscape, although Pentax didn’t reveal how many zones there would be.]

TKO: In this camera, focus adjustment is assumed to be only zone focus. We adopted zone focusing because we believe that zone focus is the best mechanism for young users entering the world of film cameras to take a step from pan-focus to the next level. Zone focus is a style in which users judge the distance visually and select a proper zone. So there actually isn’t any autofocus, it will be the user selecting their own setting. This style is very suitable for snapshots, and you can adjust it, switch it very intuitively.

“We adopted zone focusing because we believe that zone focus is the best mechanism for young users entering the world of film.”

I tried taking pictures with a prototype and found it really fun to judge the distance myself, decide the distance and take the picture. I realized that I had completely forgotten how much fun it was. Of course there will be failures, but I believe that failure is one of the charms of film photography.

Tomoki Tanaka: In the case of digital cameras, we can see the picture right after we shoot it, and many people like to check the screen to see if it is in focus or not. But in the case of film cameras, we take the pictures, and we have some hope for how they will turn out, but we don’t know until we get the results. So, in this sense, making a picture all by yourself and having responsibility for the focus can be fun.

The difference between digital and film shutters

Dave Etchells: TKO said that the electronic shutter mechanism is specifically optimized for film camera use. What’s the difference compared to shutters in digital cameras like the Pentax WG or Ricoh G series cameras?

TKO: Film cameras need to prevent light leakage, not only when shooting but also when the power is off. Even if you’re not using the camera, the film is always there, so that makes it extremely sensitive to light leakage. It’s not just the shutters themselves but the mechanism around them; the entire camera body has to be designed to avoid light leakage. It’s a much more serious problem than in digital cameras.

When I read that the new camera would have “shooting modes,” I immediately thought of the standard PASM dial. Pentax declined to give any specific details, but TKO’s observation that aperture won’t have a lot of effect on the images due to the half-frame format and relatively wide angle lens suggests that any modes won’t involve aperture control. (To be 100% clear, though, Pentax gave no indication of what “shooting modes” might mean.)

Photo: Richard Butler

What’s meant by “shooting modes”?

Dave Etchells: TKO also mentioned the ability for the user to choose the shooting mode via a control dial. What did he mean by shooting mode? Will there be anything like PASM options, or was he referring to something else?

TKO: We can’t disclose all the details of this yet, but basically, the camera can shoot automatically, controlling the aperture and shutter speed by itself. But if that is all you have, if everything is controlled by the camera, you won’t be able to enjoy changing the settings yourself, so we’re considering making it possible to choose from several shooting modes. I’m afraid we can’t go into more detail on this right now, but there will be some choices that the user can make.

Tomoki Tanaka: We can provide good pictures by having the camera control the exposure, but we want to let the user apply their own modifications. That’s what we want to make available.

Dave Etchells: It may be too early to ask this, but will the camera have an entirely manual exposure mode, as in the user can set an exposure of F8 at 1/250?

TKO: Please wait. <laughter> But I want to say that because the camera is half-frame, the depth of field will be very great, so adjusting the aperture may not be very effective in changing that.

Despite the best exchange rates in decades, film prices are high in Japan, just like the US. (When this photo was taken, a 3-pack of 36-exposure Kodak Gold 200 film cost ¥6,180, or about $40.) While it trades off some ultimate image quality, the Pentax Film Camera’s half-frame format will make photography a lot more affordable for users.

Photo: Dave Etchells

Getting film into the hands of consumers

Dave Etchells: Moving on to a related but non-camera subject, I see that Ricoh has begun selling film. I think that’s a brilliant move, but I would like to hear the thinking behind it. Was this made possible through any particular partnership or collaboration?

Ryutaro Aratama: We are trying an experiment selling film directly. We would like to cooperate with film manufacturers and others to try to improve both the supply and price.

Dave Etchells: What brands are you selling right now?

Tomoki Tanaka: An assortment; some Fuji and Kodak films, and monochrome films by Ilford; actually several assortments.

Ryutaro Aratama: This is a trial, though; we source them on the spot, and once one is gone, it’s gone.

Tomoki Tanaka: This is a trial project, a trial challenge, and we will have to work together with people in other territories as well to gain experience. The aim isn’t mainly to sell film but to build relationships and give opportunities to consumers.

Pentax has a “Clubhouse” in the Yotsuya neighborhood of Tokyo, where Pentaxians can come to see and hold the current lenses, have cleaning and light service performed on their cameras and attend exhibitions, classes and seminars. They say it’s an important way for them to stay close to their users.

Photo: Pentax Division, Ricoh Imaging Company, Ltd.

What about the high cost of processing?

Dave Etchells: Doing a film sales trial is easier for you to do in Japan than in other countries, given that you have your own retail locations here. Do you have any plans or strategies for reducing the high costs of film and processing in other parts of the world as well?

TKO: We haven’t come to any specific plan. We need to first establish relationships with development or printing companies. In the end we hope we can help to improve the cost or lead times. We’ve begun setting up relationships with several partners around the world. We’ve just started, though, and want to continue the process

Tomoki Tanaka: Indirectly, if we can grow the analog film business in the world, higher volume always makes the cost come down. Perhaps we can indirectly help with that, but we don’t want to be directly involved in film development. We just want to increase the size of the pie for everyone.

Pentax has long been known for making water-resistant and waterproof/shockproof cameras. Their latest model is the WG-90, announced in November, 2023. It’s a 16 megapixel/5x zoom model that’s waterproof to 14m (46 ft.), shockproof against a fall from 1.6m (5 ft.), and freezeproof to -10C (14F).

The future of the WG (weather-resistant) camera line

Dave Etchells: Finally, the WG-90 has been released since I met with [Ricoh Imaging president, Noboru] Akahane last year. How does the WG line fit into Pentax’s overall strategy? What has the market trend been like for waterproof/rugged cameras in recent years? Is it increasing, decreasing or holding steady?

Tomoki Tanaka: I think it’s stable. We don’t have market data except from our own sales history, but we believe there is a demand for water-resistant or waterproof and shockproof types of cameras, and I see this continuing. We at Pentax have offered products like this for a long time, probably more than 30 years. Our first water-resistant camera was the Zoom-90 WR; I remember it clearly because it was shipping back when I first joined Pentax in 1992. We believe that there is a demand from users so we should offer the product.

The WG-90 is just the latest in a long string of weather-resistant and waterproof cameras. The Pentax Zoom-90 WR was first released in 1991, the year before current General Manager Tomoki Tanaka joined the company.

Photo: Butkus.org camera manual site, used with permission

Conclusion

Pentax is making a big bet on the rebirth of film by being the first major manufacturer to commit to making a new film camera in decades. It’s no small thing, as they’ve had to start completely from scratch, recapturing the expertise of retired film-era engineers, reviving or replacing decades-gone supply chains and setting up mass manufacturing to meet global demand for a product more mechanically complex than not only today’s digital cameras but even late-model film cameras with motorized film advance and rewind mechanisms.

It all began as one man’s passion project, but TKO’s enthusiasm is infectious, and the idea of a new film camera, hopefully even a line of them, turned into a passion project for the company as a whole.

Every company gets excited about its latest products, but what I felt at Pentax was on another level; there’s an overriding sense of doing something new and almost revolutionary, of being part of a movement rather than just adding the next checkbox to an already-bulging digital feature list.

At the heart of it all is the film community itself. There’s truly a new generation of photographers rising, sharing an excitement about photography that digital cameras and cell phones could never ignite. As has been true of photographers in any era, they’re supportive of each other and happy to do whatever they can to help other people enjoy the craft, too.

“Every company gets excited about its latest products, but what I felt at Pentax was on another level.”

Pentax tapped into and became a part of that community, letting their efforts be guided by what they heard people asking for rather than imposing their own ideas on the market.

Will it work? We’ll see this summer, but if they can bring a well-built, reliable and attractive modern film camera to the market, I think they’re going to have more demand than they can handle.

On a parting note, I do hope that the enthusiast community will recognize and accept that they’re not the primary target for this particular model. If it succeeds, there’ll be other cameras coming, some designed for us, but right now, Pentax needs to focus on the under-40 crowd I saw almost exclusively in the Tokyo used camera shops. That’s the mass movement that Pentax needs to ride to not only kick-start their own product line but hopefully reboot the whole analog film world as well.

All that said, while I’m more of an SLR or at least an advanced-rangefinder sort myself, I plan to be one of the first in line to buy a new Pentax film camera when they’re released. Who knows, maybe my enlarger and developing trays will find their way back into a spare bathroom again 🙂



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Adobe Max Roundup: the demos

Published

on

By

Adobe Max Roundup: the demos


Photo: Mitchell Clark

This year we attended Adobe Max in person, where we got to demo several of the new features in Photoshop, Lightroom, and Adobe Camera Raw. If you missed the announcement, you can read our coverage of it here, though we’ll be covering the hits here.

We documented the demos on our Instagram, but in case you missed it, we’re rounding them up here. We were also able to interview some folks at Adobe while at the show, so stay tuned for more on the future of Photoshop, Lightroom, and other Adobe projects like Content Credentials.

Adobe Camera Raw Adaptive profile

Adobe has added a new profile to Adobe Camera Raw, called Adaptive. It uses AI to analyze what’s in the scene, and adjust exposure, tones, saturation, and other parameters automatically, potentially giving you a better starting point for your own edits. It’s also designed to work with HDR images and produces both HDR and SDR profiles, making it even more useful for those who aren’t used to editing for HDR displays yet.

Since it’s substantially more opinionated than other profiles like Adobe Color or Adobe Landscape, there’s also an amount slider that lets you tone down or turn up the results.

Photoshop automatic distraction removal

Perhaps one of the niftiest features Adobe added to Photoshop is the automatic distraction removal tool. It analyzes your photo for cables, wires, or people that may be in the way of your subject, then automatically fills in the areas they took up.

Lightroom Quick Actions

Lightroom’s new Quick Actions, available on Mobile and Web, will automatically mask parts of your image like subjects, backgrounds, and skies, and let you make adjustments to them.

Lightroom Frame.io integration

Frame.io is now built into Lightroom, letting you access images uploaded to the cloud service. Combine that with Frame.io’s Camera To Cloud feature, available on some Fujifilm, Panasonic, Nikon, Canon, and Leica cameras, and you can take pictures on your camera then watch them appear wirelessly in Lightroom.

Content Credentials

Adobe’s Content Credentials system is part of a larger industry-wide initiative to help prove what content on the web is authentic, and to keep track of what edits have been made to it. While at Max, we got to take a look at the Chrome extension meant to surface the credentials attached to images on social media and other sites, as well as the closed beta site that lets you attach content credentials to your own images, and view what credentials are attached to existing images.

We got to sit down with one of the senior directors of the Content Authenticity Initiative at Adobe while at the conference, so expect a more thorough check-in of the technology to come.

Generative Extend in Premiere Pro

Photoshop has had several generative AI features in beta for a while now, but now Adobe has introduced one for its Premiere video editing software. It lets you extend a clip by up to two seconds, helping you fill in gaps, transitions, or slightly flubbed takes with imagery generated by Adobe’s Firefly model.

According to Meagan Keane, Principal Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Pro Video, the idea came from asking customers what some of their biggest editing pain points were. The Pro Video team was then able to take that to the research team, and the result is Generative Extend.





Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

On this day in 2014: The Panasonic GH4, which brought 4K to the masses, reviewed

Published

on

By

On this day in 2014: The Panasonic GH4, which brought 4K to the masses, reviewed


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Photo: DPReview staff

As part of DPReview’s 25th anniversary celebration, we’re looking back at some of the more significant cameras to come along over the past 25 years, and today, we’re highlighting the camera that led the 4K revolution in consumer cameras: the Panasonic GH4. Officially announced in early 2014, we published our GH4 review on October 16, 2014 – ten years ago today.

We’ve all become so used to 4K video that it no longer registers as unique. It’s found on virtually every mirrorless camera made today, smartphones, action cameras, miniature gimbal cameras, webcams, security cameras, and even those wacky $100 ‘pro’ video cameras you see on Amazon and wonder who buys them.

But, of course, it wasn’t always that way, and we have the GH4 – the first mirrorless camera to capture 4K video internally – to thank for opening the metaphorical floodgates and ushering in the 4K era.

I had a personal interest in the GH4: as someone who had adopted the GH line early on for video projects, I was as curious as anyone to know how it stacked up. Although I was on staff at DPReview, I wasn’t involved in writing the GH4 review and probably read it with as much anticipation as anyone else.

Photo: DPReview staff

It’s worth remembering that the GH4 was a hybrid camera designed to appeal to both stills and video shooters, and it had features to appeal to those who wanted to do both. Like the GH3, the camera was built around a 16MP sensor, but it supported 12fps burst shooting (7.5fps with focus tracking), a 1/8000 shutter speed and 1/250th flash sync. It even had a rather lovely 2.36M-dot OLED viewfinder.

But realistically, nobody was buying a GH4 just to shoot stills. You bought it because you wanted a solid video camera that could shoot stills when needed.

“Realistically, nobody was buying a GH4 just to shoot stills.”

The GH4 could capture 4K video at up to UHD 4K/30p (3840×2160) or DCI 4K/24p (4096×2160) internally and supported both Long GOP and All-I codecs at bit rates up to 200Mbps. Although we take bit rates like this for granted today, this was very high at the time. The camera also produced pleasing 1080p video, though as we called out in our review, its HD video wasn’t as good as the perfectly oversampled 1080p video from the Sony a7s.

Despite the impressive specs and beautiful video to match, we had some nitpicks. To start, 4K video captured internally only had 8-bit 4:2:0 color, providing less flexibility for color grading in post. (10-bit 4:2:2 color was supported, but only when recording externally.) Additionally, the GH4’s sensor was 4608 pixels wide, requiring the camera to use a smaller, native crop of the sensor when shooting 4K. This resulted in a 1.1x crop for DCI 4K and a 1.2x crop for UHD 4K.

Equally as crucial as its video specs, the GH4 illustrated Panasonic’s commitment to supporting a professional video workflow.

The camera included several now-common tools to improve the video shooting experience, including focus peaking, two zebra settings, control over Master Pedestal (black level) and luminance scale, and a ‘cinema-like’ gamma preset. It also allowed users to set the shutter speed and ISO as shutter angle and gain and could generate color bars for calibration. It was also possible to switch between capture frequencies, meaning the camera could support NTSC, PAL, and true 24fps cinema standards.

“Equally as crucial as its video specs, the GH4 illustrated Panasonic’s commitment to supporting a professional video workflow.”

Alongside the camera, Panasonic released the optional DMW-YAGH interface unit. This $1999 accessory unit added two XLR inputs for audio, an SDI input for timecode, four 3D-SDI connectors capable of outputting 4:2:2 10-bit video and a 12V DC power socket. The unit attached to the bottom of the GH4 and felt oversized relative to the camera. Beginning with the GH5, the interface unit was phased out in favor of the DMW-XLR1, a much more affordable option in the style of the hotshoe-mounted XLR adapter we’ve become accustomed to today.

The GH4 was also the camera Panasonic used to debut its newest autofocus technology: Depth-from-Defocus, or DFD. DFD attempted to build a depth map of a scene by making tiny focus adjustments and analyzing changes in the image. With an understanding of the out-of-focus characteristics of a particular lens, the camera could build a depth map of the scene.

The optional DMW-YAGH ‘Interface Unit’ provided a more extensive selection of video industry connectors for using the GH4 as part of a high-end video rig.

However promising the technology may have been, DFD never quite met expectations. Panasonic really wanted to make it work, and it’s possible that, given fast enough sampling and processing, it might have continued to improve. Unfortunately for Panasonic, cameras using phase-detect autofocus consistently provided a better AF experience, particularly when shooting video, and the company eventually made the jump to phase-detection with the Lumix S5II in 2023, finally arriving in the GH series on the GH7 in 2024.

In our review of the GH4, we found a lot to like and a few frustrations. For example, despite having an autoexposure compensation dial, the camera didn’t allow you to use it when using Auto ISO in manual exposure mode, and there was no Auto ISO option when shooting video in M mode. Overall, though, we were mighty impressed and saved our biggest praise for the camera’s video capabilities:

“The GH4 was also the camera Panasonic used to debut its newest autofocus technology: Depth-from-Defocus, or DFD.”

“It’s in terms of video that the GH4 really stands out. It produces some of the best video we’ve yet seen – losing out only to the Sony a7S’s moiré-free 1080 output. The ability to capture good quality 4K, whether for use at full resolution, downsampling to 1080 or cropping to 1080, adds real flexibility to the camera. Low light performance is solid if not exceptional,” we concluded.

The GH4 landed in the retail market at a price of $1699, or about $2260 today adjusted for inflation, which isn’t far off the $2199 price of the GH7. It’s amazing to think about how expectations for video have changed over the years. However, the GH7 has its work cut out for it: rather than being an obvious standout in the crowd, it has to compete in a marketplace of cameras brimming with video features. Maybe in another ten years, we’ll look back to see how it held up.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

DJI's new dual-camera Air 3S drone gets a larger sensor and LiDAR

Published

on

By

DJI's new dual-camera Air 3S drone gets a larger sensor and LiDAR


Photo: DJI

DJI has announced the Air 3S, an update to its existing dual-camera Air 3 model that upgrades the primary camera to a larger Type 1 sensor and adds features that promise to make the drone easier to operate at night. DJI is positioning the Air 3S as “perfect for travel photography.”

The main camera on the Air 3S gains a 50MP Type 1 (13.2 x 8.8mm) CMOS sensor and features a 24mm equiv. F1.8 lens. That’s an upgrade from its predecessor, which utilized a smaller Type 1/1.3 (4.8 x 3.6mm) CMOS sensor with a marginally faster F1.7 lens. The telephoto camera remains unchanged between the two models, using a 48MP Type 1/1.3 sensor and featuring a 70mm equiv. F2.8 lens.

In addition to stills, both cameras can capture up to 4K/120p or 4K/60p when shooting HDR. All video can be captured in 10-bit, even in regular color mode, and D-Log M and HLG modes are available. The maximum ISO has been raised to 12,800 (3200 when shooting D-Log M). However, DJI says the Air 3S includes a new, more advanced video encoding algorithm that reduces video file size by over 30% without compromising image quality.

DJI claims both cameras can capture up to 14 stops of dynamic range and says the new main camera should capture even more detail than the camera on its more expensive Mavic 3 Pro model.

The DJI Air 3S is similar to its predecessor, the Air 3, but it gains a larger Type 1 (13.2 x 8.8mm) CMOS sensor on its main camera.

Image: DJI

Beyond the cameras, DJI has added several appealing features to the Air 3S:

A new Free Panorama mode enables users to create panoramic shots by stitching together images across a manually selected subject area. This works with either camera, but DJI suggests the best results will come from using the telephoto camera, which reduces distortion.

The Air 3S also includes features designed to make it easier and safer to fly at night, including Nightscape Obstacle Sensing, with the Air 3S becoming the first DJI drone to feature forward-facing LiDAR. Additionally, the drone includes downward-facing infrared sensors and six vision sensors (two each at the front, rear and bottom). According to DJI, this combination of sensors provides the Air 3S with “nightscape omnidirectional obstacle sensing,” which should allow the drone to automatically identify and navigate around obstacles for safer nighttime photography.

This technology also enables DJI’s next-gen Smart RTH (return-to-home) feature, intended to allow the drone to return safely to its takeoff location, even at night.

The Air 3S is available with either DJI’s RC-N3 controller, which requires a smartphone to monitor the camera feed and aircraft status, or the RC 2 controller (above), which includes a built-in 700-nit 5.5″ 1080 screen.

Image: DJI

The Air 3S also includes real-time vision positioning and map construction technology, designed to allow the drone to memorize a flight path and to return safely when adequate light is available, even in areas without satellite coverage.

The new model also features DJI’s ActiveTrack 360 subject tracking but introduces a new subject focusing feature designed to keep a subject in sharp focus, even during manual flight or when a subject moves off-center. This should allow a pilot to focus on creative decisions like composition or camera movement while ActiveTrack keeps the subject in focus.

There are a few hardware specs worth noting as well. The Air 3S weighs 724g (1.6 lbs), just 4g more than its predecessor, and is rated for 45 minutes of flight time. It includes DJI’s O4 video transmission system that transmits 10-bit video at up to 1080/60p and 42GB of built-in storage. A new Off-state Quick Transfer feature allows files to be transferred from the drone to a smartphone or a computer even when powered off.

Finally, for the privacy-conscious, a new Local Data mode completely disconnects the drone from the internet, ensuring that all data stays only on the device. DJI likens this mode to airplane mode on a smartphone.

The Air 3S is available in several packages. The Fly More combo shown above includes the RC 2 controller, ND filter set, two additional batteries (for a total of three), a charging hub, extra props and a shoulder bag, will retail for $1599.

Image: DJI

The charging hub that ships with the Air 3S supports PD fast charging and features a power accumulation function. It allows users to transfer the remaining power from several depleted batteries into the battery with the most remaining power – something anyone who has had to use drones in remote locations without a charging station is likely to appreciate.

Price and availability

The DJI Air 3S is available for purchase in several configurations: the drone with the RC-N3 controller, which requires a smartphone to monitor the camera feed and flight status, will retail for $1099. A Fly More combo with the RC-N3 controller, ND filter set, two additional batteries, a battery charging hub and shoulder back will retail for $1399. Finally, a Fly More combo with DJI’s RC 2 controller, which includes a built-in 700-nit 5.5″ 1080p screen, ND filter set, two additional batteries, charging hub and shoulder pack, will retail for $1599.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending