Connect with us

Camera

The absolute beginner’s guide to film photography: the ‘Sunny 16’ rule or how-to expose with no meter

Published

on

The absolute beginner’s guide to film photography: the ‘Sunny 16’ rule or how-to expose with no meter


Aaron Gold

No light meter? No problem. With the ‘Sunny 16’ rule you’ll never have to second-guess exposures again, even when photographing tricky scenes like sunsets.

All photos: Dan Bracaglia

The purpose of our Absolute beginner’s guide to film photography series is to help demystify the joys of shooting analog. And while we try not to dabble too much in specifics, there is one (sort-of) hard-and-fast analog-era rule we think every film (and digital) shooter should know: the ‘Sunny 16’ rule.

What is Sunny 16 and why is it important for film photography?

Sunny 16 is an easy way to set your camera’s exposure if you don’t have a working light meter or you suspect your camera’s light meter might be reading the scene improperly. The light meters in film cameras are generally much less sophisticated than those in today’s digital cameras, and they are easier to fool. The Sunny 16 rule provides a quick reality check on your meter readings, as well as a starting point to set exposure without the help of a meter.

How the Sunny 16 rule works

Lighting conditions Correct aperture when shooting
ISO 100 film @ 1/100 sec
Snow or sand F22
Sunny F16
Some clouds F11
Overcast F8
Heavy overcast F5.6
Sunset F4

It’s simple: Sunny 16 says that on a sunny day, you should set your aperture to F16 and your shutter speed to the reciprocal of your film speed, or as close to it as you can get. So if you’re shooting 100 ASA film, set F16 and 1/90 or 1/125 sec. Running 400 speed film? Try F16 and 1/500 sec. Your exposure may not be perfect, but it will be close enough to get a usable shot.

The Sunny 16 rule gives us a quick reality check on our meter readings, as well as a starting point to set exposure without the help of our meter

What if the sun isn’t out? If it’s a little cloudy, use F11; overcast, use F8; thunderclouds, F5.6; sunset, try F4. For very bright scenes (like snow), go the opposite way and use F22. Can’t remember all that? Don’t worry, you can buy stickers and t-shirts to remind you.

If you understand the basics of exposure, you can find comparable exposures that will work. Let’s say it’s a sunny day and you’re shooting 100 speed film. The Sunny 16 Rule tells you to shoot at F16 at 1/125 sec. But what if you want shallower depth of field than F16 will provide? No problem – you can open up your lens by three stops to F5.6, and compensate with a three-stop-quicker shutter speed of 1/1000 sec.

Shooting film on a sunny day? According to the Sunny 16 rule, simply set your aperture to F16, your shutter speed to the reciprocal of your film speed (so if you’re shooting ISO 100 film, ~1/100 sec), and your exposure should be close-enough to spot on; amazing!

I have a meter, do I need Sunny 16?

The whole purpose of having a meter is so you can get a more precise exposure, but the meters in older film cameras are relatively easy to fool. Meters are calibrated for what is known as middle gray, and for most scenes, which have a mixture of light and dark areas, that’s close enough. But if you are taking a photograph of something unusually light or dark, like a snowy landscape or someone wearing dark clothing, your meter may not give the correct exposure information.

If you are taking a photograph of something unusually light or dark, like a snowy landscape or a dark building, your camera’s meter may not give the correct exposure information

Here, Sunny 16 can act as a check for metering errors. Let’s say it’s a nice sunny day, and you’re shooting a jet-black car on ISO 200 film. You set your shutter sped to 1/250, and your meter tells you to set F8. The meter ‘sees’ that dark car and interprets it as middle gray, so it’ll recommend a wider aperture that will overexpose your photo. The meter’s recommendation is two stops off of what Sunny 16 tells you, and that’s a good indicator that your meter is wrong.

Why are film camera meters so easy to fool?

Shooting on an overcast day? Sunny 16 has got your back, simply open up your camera’s aperture up to F8 (and be there!).

Today, most digital cameras use sophisticated multi-segment meters that break your scene up into small parts and examine each one. Some cameras have a built-in database of sample exposures that can help them determine the contents of your scene and meter accordingly. Mirrorless cameras measure exposure from the exact same imaging sensor that captures the picture (and you can preview exposure precisely in the viewfinder).

Most film cameras from the 1960s, 70s and 80s have a center-weighted meter – they average the whole scene but give more importance to what’s in the middle

Film camera meters are nowhere near that smart. Some late-model film cameras have multi-zone matrix meters, but (aside from a handful of flagship pro SLRs) they tend to have relatively few segments. Most film cameras from the 1960s, 70s and 80s have a center-weighted meter. These meters average the whole scene and give more importance (‘weight’) to what’s in the middle, since that’s how most people frame their subjects. Some center-weighted meters give less weight to the upper section of the photo, which is where the sky generally is. Just turning the camera sideways can be enough to throw off the meter. Some older cameras have a spot meter, which only measures what’s in the middle of the frame. Framing with your subject off center is enough to give an incorrect measurement.

How do you know how your camera meters? Your camera’s manual should have an illustration showing the meter pattern. More sophisticated film cameras will let you switch between matrix, center-weighted and spot modes, but they can still be fooled.

What about a snowy day? According to Sunny 16, stopping down to F22 should get you fairly close to an accurate exposure.

What do I listen to: the meter or the Sunny 16 rule?

The Sunny 16 rule is pretty accurate, to the point that some very simple cameras display a sun and clouds rather than F-stop numbers. If your camera is within a stop or so of the Sunny 16 rule, the exposure will generally be close; when in doubt, underexpose a bit.

If your camera is within a stop or so of the Sunny 16 rule, the exposure will generally be close

If your meter is way off from Sunny 16, you might want to hedge your bets by shooting three pictures – one taken at the meter’s indicated exposure, one using the Sunny 16 rule, and one right in the middle. Be sure to make a note of your exposures and then check the finished result to see which was the most correct. Soon you’ll learn what situations can fool your meter and when it can be trusted – and you’ll also learn when the Sunny 16 rule by itself is good enough.

About

Our ‘Absolute beginner’s guide to film photography’ is an educational series of articles focused on demystifying the ins and outs of analog photography. Geared toward those discovering (or re-discovering) film, the series will cover everything from gear, to technique and more. View all of the articles in our guide here.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Camera

Pentax K-1 and K-1 II firmware updates include astrophotography features (depending on where you live)

Published

on

By

Pentax K-1 and K-1 II firmware updates include astrophotography features (depending on where you live)


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Yesterday, Ricoh quietly released firmware 2.50 for its Pentax K-1 and K-1 II DSLRs. However, the features you can expect to gain from this update may depend on your geography.

Ricoh’s English-language firmware pages for the K-1 and K-1 II state that firmware 2.50 delivers “Improved stability for general performance.”

However, astute Pentax users noted that Ricoh’s Japanese-language firmware pages (translation) indicate that the update also includes a limited feature called “Astronomical Photo Assist,” a collection of three new features designed for astrophotography: Star AF, remote control focus fine adjustment, and astronomical image processing.

Star AF is intended to automate focusing on stars when using autofocus lenses. Rather than manually focusing on a bright star and changing your composition, it promises to let you compose your shot and let the camera focus.

Remote control fine adjustment allows users to adjust focus without touching the lens and requires Pentax’s optional O-RC1 remote. Astronomical image processing will enable users to make in-camera adjustments to astrophotography images, including shading correction, fogging correction, background darkness, star brightness, celestial clarity, and fringe correction.

Astronomical image processing on the K-1 and K-1 II will enable users to make in-camera adjustments to astrophotography images, including shading correction, fogging correction, background darkness, star brightness, celestial clarity, and fringe correction.

According to Ricoh, Astronomical Photo Assist is a premium feature that must be purchased and costs ¥11,000 for an activation key (about $70 at current exchange rates).

Although these astrophotography features appear to be Japan-only for now, a Ricoh representative tells us, “Ricoh Imaging Americas confirmed that the premium firmware features for the PENTAX K-1 and PENTAX K-1 Mark II will eventually be available to US customers.”

Firmware update 2.50 for both the K-1 and K-1 II is available for download from Ricoh’s website.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850

Published

on

By

On this day 2017: Nikon launches D850


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

As part of our twenty fifth anniversary, we’re looking back at some of the most significant cameras launched and reviewed during that period. Today’s pick was launched seven years ago today* and yet we’re only quite recently stepping out of its shadow.

The Nikon D850 is likely to be remembered as the high watermark of DSLR technology. We may yet still see impressive developments from Ricoh in the future (we’d love to see a significantly upgraded Pentax K-1 III), but the D850 was perhaps the green flash as the sun set on the DSLR as the dominant technology in the market.

Click here to read our Nikon D850 review

Why do we think it was such a big deal? Because it got just about everything right. Its 45MP sensor brought dual conversion gain to high pixel count sensors, meaning excellent dynamic range at base ISO and lower noise at high ISOs. Its autofocus system was one of the best we’ve ever seen on a DSLR: easy to use and highly dependable, with a good level of coverage. And then there was a body and user interface honed by years of iterative refinement, that made it easy to get the most out of the camera.

None of this is meant as a slight towards the other late-period DSLRs but the likes of Canon’s EOS 5DS and 5DSR didn’t present quite such a complete package of AF tracking, daylight DR and low-light quality as the Nikon did. With its ability to shoot at up to 9fps (if you used the optional battery grip), the D850 started to chip away at the idea that high megapixel cameras were specialized landscape and studio tools that would struggle with movement or less-than-perfect lighting. And that’s without even considering its 4K video capabilities.

In the seven years since the D850 was launched, mirrorless cameras have eclipsed most areas in which DSLRs once held the advantage. For example, the Z8 can shoot faster, autofocus more with more accuracy and precision, across a wider area of the frame and do so while shooting at much faster rates.

But, even though it outshines the D850 in most regards, the Z8 is still based around what we believe is a (significant) evolution of the same sensor, and its reputation still looms large enough for Nikon to explicitly market the Z8 as its “true successor.”

Nikon D850 sample gallery

Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

*Actually seven years ago yesterday: we had to delay this article for a day to focus on the publishing the Z6III studio scene: the latest cameras taking precedence over our anniversary content.



Source link

Continue Reading

Camera

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear

Published

on

By

Nikon Z6III added to studio scene, making image quality clear


When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Photo: Richard Butler

We’ve just received a production Nikon Z6III and took it into our studio immediately to get a sense for how the sensor really performs.

Dynamic range tests have already been conducted, but these only give a limited insight into the image quality as a whole. As expected, our Exposure Latitude test – which mimics the effect of reducing exposure to capture a bright sunrise or sunset, then making use of the deep shadows – shows a difference if you use the very deepest shadows, just as the numerical DR tests imply.

Likewise, our ISO Invariance test shows there’s more of a benefit to be had from applying more amplification by raising the ISO setting to overcome the read noise, than there was in the Z6 II. This means there’s a bigger improvement when you move up to the higher gain step of the dual conversion gain sensor but, as with the Z6 II, little more to be gained beyond that.

These are pushing at the extreme of the sensor’s performance though. For most everyday photography, you don’t use the deepest shadows of the Raw files, so differences in read noise between sensors don’t play much of a role. In most of the tones of an image, sensor size plays a huge role, along with any (pretty rare) differences in light capturing efficiency.

Image Comparison
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.

As expected, the standard exposures look identical to those of the Z6 II. There are similar (or better) levels of detail at low ISO, in both JPEG and Raw. At higher ISO, the Z6III still looks essentially the same as the Z6II. Its fractionally higher level of read noise finally comes back to have an impact at very, very high ISO settings.

Overall, then, there is a read noise price to be paid for the camera’s faster sensor, in a way that slightly blunts the ultimate flexibility of the Raw files at low ISO and that results in fractionally more noise at ultra-high ISOs. But we suspect most people will more than happily pay this small price in return for a big boost in performance.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending