Camera
Review: DJI’s FPV drone combines DJI features with the fun of a racing drone
DJI has officially entered the FPV (first-person-view) drone market. Typically, remote pilots interested in the type of immersive flight experience FPV drones provide, including the ability to maneuver through tight spaces and in close proximity to objects, all while performing aerobatics such as flips and rolls, had to also master an entirely different set of skills.
Soldering, understanding how to configure an RC controller specifically for a drone, learning how frequencies work, and installing the right motors are just a few disciplines a would-be FPV pilot must undertake to create a safe and effective FPV flight system.
Some people who delight in these challenges will always enjoy the process of building, but DJI is betting many more people will want to cross over to FPV with an intuitive solution, and its FPV drone is ready to fly right out of the box for $1299. As an added bonus, the system is equipped with GPS, obstacle avoidance sensors, and a Return To Home feature – ensuring that beginners will be less likely to crash or lose their drone.
DJI tells us it set out to create a cinematic FPV drone and combined elements of its Mavic series with the features and functionalities of traditional FPV drones. Is this a product that will appeal to a broader audience, especially beginners? Or, are there downsides that would make some users look at more traditional drone models?
We had the opportunity to test DJI’s new FPV drone, so read on to discover if this is your ideal introduction to the world of FPV.
JKey specifications
- 795g (1.75 lbs.) total weight
- 255×312×127mm (with propellers)
- 1/ 2.3” 12MP CMOS image sensor
- 35mm equivalent lens (150º FOV)
- Ability to capture photo and video on the same flight
- 4k/60p and 1080/240p video at 120Mbps
- H.264 and H.265 codecs
- Emergency brake and hover
- Obstacle avoidance sensors on front and bottom of aircraft
- OcuSync 3.0 (O3) transmission system for 10km range, dual frequencies, 50 Mbps bitrate
- 20-minute max flight time
- 140 kph (87 mph) max speed
- Memory card holder in goggles in case drone is lost
Here is a basic comparison chart to get an idea of the difference between a traditional FPV drone and what DJI offers.
| Traditional FPV drones | DJI FPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Flight modes | Angle, Horizon, Acro | Normal, Sport, Manual |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Obstacle avoidance | None | 4 stereoscopic sensors + an auxiliary light |
| Camera | Customizable | Built-in 4K/60p with 150º FOV and RockSteady EIS |
| Assembly | Requires in-depth knowledge of parts, radio frequencies, ESCs, motors, assembly, soldering | Already assembled and ready to fly right out of the box |
| Flight assistance | None | Return To Home, Emergency Brake and Hover |
| Auto-stabilization | None | Available for ‘N’ and ‘S’ modes |
| Flight time | 3 – 10 minutes | Up to 20 minutes |
| Battery type | Lithium Polymer (LiPo) | Intelligent Flight |
| Transmission | Analog, short-range, lower quality | Live digital video feed at 810/120p, low-latency |
The hardware
I tested the DJI Standard FPV Combo ($1,299), which includes the drone, FPV Goggles V2, and the remote controller 2. As usual, DJI offers an additional ‘Fly More’ combo that includes two extra batteries and a 3-battery charging hub for $299.
The goggles, which are 202x126x110mm with all four antennas attached, activate with the help of an 1800 mAh 9V battery that’s connected by a USB-C power cable. Lasting an estimated 110 minutes between charges, it’s light enough that it can hang down by your side while in operation. Still, I typically put the battery in the pocket of a coat I was wearing as an extra measure to ensure the battery didn’t get disconnected.
 |
DJI’s FPV drone features a new OcuSync 3.0 transmission system. It boasts a 10 km (6.2 mile) range, dual-frequencies, a 50 Mbps bitrate, and three options for first-person-viewing – a Low-latency HD mode for near-real-time feed and clear image, Smooth mode for higher frame rates and decreased latency, and Audience mode. The latter option allows others wearing V2 goggles to join in and view your real-time feed.
4K/60p footage with the camera facing upward. FPV mode through the goggles is very smooth, thanks to OcuSync 3.0 transmission.
The FPV drone will also operate on DJI’s Fly app, introduced in 2019 for the Mavic Mini. It’s cleaner and more pared down for a superior user experience. The app is still in beta and wasn’t available for testing with the FPV drone. Nevertheless, I activated all of the drone’s features through drop-down menu items in the goggles.
The joystick-type button on the top lower-right-hand corner will guide the pilot through numerous settings and features for both the remote and camera. The goggles receive up to 810/60p video transmission in high-quality mode and less than 28 milliseconds of latency, or 120 fps in low-latency mode.
 |
V2 of DJI’s remote controller is ergonomically friendly and gives you immediate access to features you’ll need including Return to Home, a gimbal wheel that can pitch the camera upwards and downwards at 90-degree angles, the ability to switch back and forth between flight modes, plus a button to stop the drone and put it in a stable hover if control of the drone is suddenly lost. You can also lock the gimbal at an upward or downward angle.
One note: I did not receive the hand motion controller due to shipping delays. This review will be updated once I’ve tested it out.
Photos and Video
The camera uses a 12MP, 1/2.3” sensor, providing a 150º FOV, and is mounted on a 1-axis gimbal. Capable of capturing stills and video up to either 4K/60p, or 1080p/120p for 4X slow motion, at 120 Mbps, the camera uses an electronic roll axis and RockSteady image stabilization. While it provides smoother imagery than most FPV drones, it’s not comparable to the 3-axis mechanical image stabilization offered up in DJI’s other series of photography drones, including the Mavic.
 |
| DJI’s FPV drone takes decent photos at times. If you’re serious about aerial photography, though, the Mavic 2 Pro is a better investment. |
Remote pilots can capture .JPG and images or .MP4 and .MOV clips all in the same flight. It’s easy to toggle back and forth between these modes. While the photos I captured are decent enough, there were times when the drone was tilted, resulting in photos with crooked horizons. Also, photo resolution is limited to 3840×2160, the same as 4K video. Anyone serious about drone photography will probably want to look at a more-photo-centric model; the FPV drone is fun to fly but is not a replacement for traditional photography drones.
 |
| There’s a fair amount of fisheye distortion from the FPV drone’s wide lens, though a distortion correction function in the camera menu can be applied. |
I typically enjoy recording aerial videos with the gimbal tilted down. With the wide FOV on the FPV drone, it is likely parts of the propellers will become visible. I also noticed some fisheye effect in some of my clips. To prevent this, you can either tilt the gimbal up as the aircraft moves forward or adjust settings through the goggles. To do this, access Advanced Camera Settings in the Camera menu and select Distortion Correction.
In-flight
Obstacle avoidance and flight modes
There are four obstacle avoidance sensors on the FPV drone – two in the front of the aircraft and two on the bottom with an auxiliary light that helps with precision movement in low-light environments. Obstacle avoidance sensors only work when the drone is flown in ‘N’ or Normal mode. This mode is suitable for beginners and highly recommended for those flying an FPV drone for the first time.
 |
| An auxiliary light helps with precision in low-light conditions. |
You’ll also be limited to flying to 50 km/h (31 mph) in normal mode. The drone is stabilized the entire time and will slow down if it approaches a forward or downward-facing obstacle. ‘S’ or sport mode disables obstacle avoidance sensors and ups the excitement factor. The drone can travel up to 97 km/h (60 mph) and can perform pitches and rolls at limited angles, all while maintaining altitude and stabilization for the entire flight.
In normal mode, you can’t fly quite as aggressively, but obstacle avoidance sensors are active. This is a good setting for first-time FPV fliers.
‘M’ or manual mode is reserved for the experts. One may believe, at first, that manual mode can be triggered through the remote with the press of a button. It’s a bit more complicated. Operating a drone in Acro mode is challenging, to say the least. While flipping and rolling a drone looks fun, in reality, it’s easy to get disoriented. DJI anticipated the potential hazard of a first-time user accidentally activating manual mode from the remote controller.
You can crank the speed up to 97 km/h (60 mph) in Sport mode, though that still falls short of the 140 km/hr (87 mph) you can achieve in Manual mode.
As a result, users can only activate manual mode with a series of steps from the menu options through the goggles. Add in the fact that you can fly up to 140 km/hr (87 mph) in this mode, and it’s easy enough to lose control, even when Emergency Brake and Hover can still be activated.
DJI’s Virtual Flight app simulator was created so pilots could practice FPV maneuvers without a crash risk. Nevertheless, without a lot of flight experience, an accident is still a strong possibility. Practicing in an open space such as a field or park cannot be recommended enough.
Odds and Ends
Looking at DJI’s FPV drone, the battery is noticeably massive in scale and helps balance out the aircraft. At 2000 mAh, DJI’s Intelligent Flight batteries offer up to 20 minutes of flight time – a huge improvement over typical FPV drones. As a bonus, they’re not the typical LiPos that can catch fire if overcharged or not stored properly.
DJI’s Intelligent Flight batteries offer up to 20 minutes of flight time – a huge improvement over typical FPV drones.
A flap under the camera houses ports for a MicroSD card and USB cable should you want to make updates to your drone through your computer. There is also a MicroSD slot located on the goggles. If you lose your FPV drone, you’ll still retain a memory card. This is an incredible new feature for those concerned about losing their imagery in the event of an accident. I hope DJI implements this concept in some way on future models.
What’s it like to fly?
In both ‘N’ and ‘S’ modes, DJI’s FPV drone is a great deal of fun to fly. It’s also an incredibly reassuring experience. Besides the Return to Home button, there is a bright white ‘H’ that pops up in the goggle’s viewfinder. It marks where you are relative to your launch point at all times. The system is also equipped with ADS-B technology. During a recent flight, I was immediately notified when a helicopter was nearby and was given ample time to adjust my flight path and altitude.
 |
One downside is that even though this FPV drone is relatively compact, it is quite noisy. It emits a high-pitched squeal that can be heard from several hundred feet away. Flying discreetly is out of the question. During one of my first flights, my daughter joked if it was the drone or ‘the ice fishers on the frozen lake screaming.’ DJI has worked tirelessly on improving ESCs and designing more aerodynamic propellers. Curiously, these updates weren’t applied to the FPV drone.
Conclusion
Anyone hesitating to enter into the world of FPV because they didn’t have the time or patience to learn about all the factors that go into building a capable system will naturally want to try out DJI’s latest release. As mentioned at the beginning of this review, it’s an out-of-the-box product that can be activated almost immediately. When you add in fail-safe features, including GPS, Return to Home, Emergency Brake and Hover, it makes it that much more enticing to dive in.
That being said, there are a few concerns that come to mind. Traditional FPV drones are known for being resilient. Lightweight and constructed out of flexible materials made of carbon fiber, for example, they can crash into objects and require a motor replacement or a bit of soldering. DJI’s FPV drone consists of a tough plastic shell that will break with a high enough impact.
 |
| DJI’s ‘Fly More’ combo for the FPV drone includes two extra batteries and a 3-battery charging hub for $299. |
The ability to truly freestyle, fly close to objects, and through narrow spaces is part of what makes FPV flight exhilarating. If you feel like you’re going to significantly damage your drone and ship it off for repair every time it collides with an object, the true joy of flying FPV will be stifled to a degree.
I had the unfortunate experience of crashing my DJI FPV loaner in manual mode, and it needed to be sent back to DJI for repairs. Even if I possessed the skills required to build and repair FPV units, it wouldn’t have been possible for me to do it myself. People who like to customize their builds and tinker likely won’t want to be at the mercy of one manufacturer when it comes to repairs or parts replacement.
Another issue that will bug some purists is the inability to replace or use more than the camera built into DJI’s FPV drone. It isn’t designed to carry an additional payload. Pilots won’t be able to attach a GoPro or OSMO Action camera, for example. The lack of flexibility in the camera is limiting and will be a turn-off for some FPV filmmakers.
I had the unfortunate experience of crashing my DJI FPV loaner in manual mode and it needed to be sent back to DJI for repairs.
Geofencing is another longstanding feature of DJI’s that rubs some people the wrong way. While all pilots need to be safe and compliant, some have switched to other drone brands to avoid and restrictions it brings up altogether. Even if you remain low to the ground, the drone will not take off if the airspace is considered restricted.
What will appeal to almost anyone is the long-range flight this drone offers. FPV is traditionally associated with close range and choppy analog feeds. If you stray too far from your home base, you run the risk of losing connection completely – which is a potential hazard. With DJI’s FPV drone, you can fly much longer distances so long as you remain within visual line of sight.
DJI’s FPV drone is certainly going to appeal to those who want to get into this style of flying. Purists who’ve already built advanced FPV drones that are resilient and carry their preferred camera will likely pass on this one. My main concern is that most remote pilots new to FPV won’t truly be prepared to operate in manual mode. While flips and rolls look exciting, it takes a lot of practice and perseverance to get the right feel for it. DJI Care Refresh is available in any event.
What we like
- GPS, Emergency Brake feature, Return to Home, Hover
- OcuSync 3.0 for clear transmission and long-range
- 4K/60p video
- Modes to suit beginner and advanced pilots
- Activates and is ready to fly right out of the box
What we don’t
- Lack of ability to switch out cameras
- Extremely loud
- Will likely need to be sent to DJI for repair if crashed
| NASA photo / Matthew Dominick |
Hurricane Milton is barreling across the Gulf of Mexico toward the west coast of Florida, putting almost 15 million Florida residents under flood watches and prompting the evacuation of millions from the central part of the state.
Earlier today, NASA astronaut and photographer Matthew Dominick shared photos and video of Hurricane Milton through the window of the Crew Dragon Endeavour spacecraft. The spacecraft is currently waiting to undock from the International Space Station to return to Earth.
The National Hurricane Center continued to classify Milton as a Category 5 hurricane, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 265 km/h (165 mph) and warning of “life-threatening inundation from storm surge.” However, the view from space belies the terrifying wind and rain on the ground, clearly showing the pinwheel shape of the hurricane with an identifiable eye at its center.
Additionally, Dominick posted a timelapse video from Dragon Endeavour on X, giving a sense of what it’s like to pass directly over the hurricane.
Timelapse flying by Hurricane Milton about 2 hours ago.
1/6400 sec exposure, 14mm, ISO 500, 0.5 sec interval, 30fps pic.twitter.com/p5wBlC95mx
— Matthew Dominick (@dominickmatthew) October 8, 2024
In addition to Dominick’s posts on X, NASA has shared two videos of the hurricane from the International Space Station that provide different views:
Although Milton may appear serene from space, and maybe even beautiful, it poses a real risk to life and property down on Earth and will impact millions. If you’re anywhere in the path of the hurricane, you can visit the National Weather Service’s feed on X, where the agency is posting regular updates and information.
| NASA photo / Matthew Dominick |
Hurricane Milton is barreling across the Gulf of Mexico toward the west coast of Florida, putting almost 15 million Florida residents under flood watches and prompting the evacuation of millions from the central part of the state.
Earlier today, NASA astronaut and photographer Matthew Dominick shared photos and video of Hurricane Milton through the window of the Crew Dragon Endeavour spacecraft. The spacecraft is currently waiting to undock from the International Space Station to return to Earth.
The National Hurricane Center continued to classify Milton as a Category 5 hurricane, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 265 km/h (165 mph) and warning of “life-threatening inundation from storm surge.” However, the view from space belies the terrifying wind and rain on the ground, clearly showing the pinwheel shape of the hurricane with an identifiable eye at its center.
Additionally, Dominick posted a timelapse video from Dragon Endeavour on X, giving a sense of what it’s like to pass directly over the hurricane.
Timelapse flying by Hurricane Milton about 2 hours ago.
1/6400 sec exposure, 14mm, ISO 500, 0.5 sec interval, 30fps pic.twitter.com/p5wBlC95mx
— Matthew Dominick (@dominickmatthew) October 8, 2024
In addition to Dominick’s posts on X, NASA has shared two videos of the hurricane from the International Space Station that provide different views:
Although Milton may appear serene from space, and maybe even beautiful, it poses a real risk to life and property down on Earth and will impact millions. If you’re anywhere in the path of the hurricane, you can visit the National Weather Service’s feed on X, where the agency is posting regular updates and information.
Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners
The Natural History Museum has announced the winners of its prestigious Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition. This year, the museum received a record-breaking 59,228 entries from 117 countries and territories and granted awards to 100 photos. The two Grand Title winners were selected from 18 category winners.
Celebrating its 60th year, Wildlife Photographer of the Year is developed and produced by the Natural History Museum, London. You can visit the exhibition in person at the museum beginning Friday, October 11, and on tour around the UK and in Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Switzerland, with more locations to be announced. The exhibition features all 100 winning images, videos showing the impact wildlife photography can have globally, and past Grand Title winners.
Here, we present some of our favorites, including the Grand Title and winners of many award categories.
Wildlife Photographer of the Year: Grand Title
 |
The Swarm of Life by Shane Gross, Canada
Wildlife Photographer of the Year: Grand Title
Winner, Wetlands: The Bigger Picture
Shane Gross looks under the surface layer of lily pads as a mass of western toad tadpoles swim past. Shane snorkeled in the lake for several hours through carpets of lily pads. This prevented any disturbance of the fine layers of silt and algae covering the lake bottom, which would have reduced visibility. Western toad tadpoles swim up from the safer depths of the lake, dodging predators and trying to reach the shallows, where they can feed. The tadpoles start becoming toads between four and 12 weeks after hatching. An estimated 99% will not survive to adulthood.
Location: Cedar Lake, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
Technical details: Nikon D500 + Tokina fisheye 10–17mm F3.5–4.5 lens at 11mm; 1/200 at F13; ISO 640; 2x Sea & Sea strobes; Aquatica housing
Copyright Shane Gross / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Young Wildlife Photographer of the Year: Grand Title
 |
Life Under Dead Wood by Alexis Tinker-Tsavalas, Germany
Young Wildlife Photographer of the Year: Grand Title
Winner, 15-17 Years
Alexis Tinker-Tsavalas rolls a log over to see the fruiting bodies of slime mold and a tiny springtail. Alexis worked fast to take this photograph, as springtails can jump many times their body length in a split second. He used a technique called focus stacking, where 36 images, each with a different area in focus, are combined. Springtails are barely two millimeters long (less than a tenth of an inch). They are found alongside slime molds and leaf litter all over the world. They feed on microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi, improving soil by helping organic matter to decompose.
Location: Berlin, Germany
Technical details: Panasonic Lumix G91 + Laowa 25mm F2.8; 2.5–5x ultra macro lens; 1/200 at F4; ISO 200; Nikon SB-900 Speedlight flash; Cygnustech macro diffuser; focus stack of 36 images
Copyright Alexis Tinker-Tsavalas / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner: Urban Wildlife
 |
Tiger in Town by Robin Darius Conz, Germany
Winner, Urban Wildlife
Robin Darius Conz watches a tiger on a hillside against the backdrop of a town where forests once grew. Robin was following this tiger as part of a documentary team filming the wildlife of the Western Ghats. On this day, he used a drone to watch the tiger explore its territory before it settled in this spot. The protected areas in the Western Ghats, where tigers are carefully monitored, are some of the most biodiverse landscapes in India and have a stable population of tigers. Outside these areas, where development has created conflict between humans and wildlife, tiger occupancy has declined.
Location: Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India
Technical details: DJI Mavic 3 Pro Cine + 70mm F2.8 lens; 1/15 at F2.8; ISO 400
Copyright Robin Darius Conz / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Behavior: Birds
 |
Practice Makes Perfect by Jack Zhi, USA
Winner, Behavior: Birds
Jack Zhi enjoys watching a young falcon practicing its hunting skills on a butterfly above its sea-cliff nest. Jack has been visiting this area for the past eight years, observing the constant presence of one of the birds and photographing the chicks. On this day, it was a challenge to track the action because the birds were so fast. Should this young peregrine falcon make it to adulthood, tests have shown it will be capable of stooping or dropping down on its prey from above at speeds of more than 300 kilometers per hour (186 miles per hour).
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Technical details: Sony α9 II + 600mm F4 lens; 1/4000 at F5.6; ISO 640
Copyright Jack Zhi / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Oceans: The Bigger Picture
 |
A Diet of Deadly Plastic by Justin Gilligan, Australia
Winner, Oceans: The Bigger Picture
Justin Gilligan (Australia) creates a mosaic from the 403 pieces of plastic found inside the digestive tract of a dead flesh-footed shearwater. Justin has been documenting Adrift Lab’s work for several years, often joining them on beach walks at dawn to collect dead chicks. The team brings together biologists from around the world to study the impact of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems. Studies found that three-quarters of adult flesh-footed shearwaters breeding on Lord Howe Island – and 100% of fledglings – contained plastic. The team, including a Natural History Museum scientist, discovered it causes scarring to the lining of the digestive tract, a condition called plasticosis.
Location: Lord Howe Island, New South Wales, Australia
Technical details: Nikon D850 + 24–70mm F2.8 lens; 1/125 at F11; ISO 400; Profoto B10 + A1 flash
Copyright Justin Gilligan / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Behavior: Invertebrates
 |
The Demolition Squad by Ingo Arndt, Germany
Winner, Behavior: Invertebrates
Ingo Arndt documents the efficient dismemberment of a blue ground beetle by red wood ants. ‘Full of ant’ is how Ingo described himself after lying next to the ants’ nest for just a few minutes. Ingo watched as the red wood ants carved an already dead beetle into pieces small enough to fit through the entrance to their nest. Much of the red wood ants’ nourishment comes from honeydew secreted by aphids, but they also need protein. They are capable of killing insects and other invertebrates much larger than themselves through sheer strength in numbers.
Location: Hessen, Germany
Technical details: Canon EOS 5DS R + 100mm F2.8 lens; 1/200 at F8; ISO 400; Canon Macro Twin Lite MT-24EX flash; softboxes
Copyright Ingo Arndt / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Photojournalism
 |
Dusting for New Evidence by Britta Jaschinski, Germany/UK
Winner, Photojournalism
Britta Jaschinski looks on as a crime scene investigator from London’s Metropolitan Police dusts for prints on a confiscated tusk. Britta spent time at the CITES Border Force department, where confiscated animal products are tested. Newly developed magnetic powder allows experts to obtain fingerprints from ivory up to 28 days after it was touched, increasing the chances of identifying those involved in its illegal trade. The International Fund for Animal Welfare has distributed more than 200 specially created kits to border forces from 40 countries. They have been instrumental in four cases that resulted in 15 arrests.
Location: Heathrow Airport, London, England, UK
Technical details: Leica SL2 + 24–90mm F2.8–4 lens at 62mm; 1/80 at F3.8; ISO 200
Copyright Britta Jaschinski / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, 11-14 Years
 |
An Evening Meal by Parham Pourahmad, USA
Winner, 11-14 Years
Parham Pourahmad watches as the last rays of the setting sun illuminate a young Cooper’s hawk eating a squirrel. Over a single summer, Parham visited Ed R Levin County Park most weekends to take photographs. He wanted to showcase the variety of wildlife living within a busy metropolitan city and to illustrate that ‘nature will always be wild and unpredictable’. The Cooper’s hawk is a common species across southern Canada, the USA, and central Mexico, where it inhabits mature and open woodlands. These adaptable birds also live in urban spaces, where there are tall trees to nest in and bird feeders that attract smaller birds, which they can prey on.
Location: Ed R Levin County Park, California, USA
Technical details: Nikon D3500 + Sigma 150–600mm F5-6.3 lens at 210mm; 1/400 at F6.3; ISO 800
Copyright Parham Pourahmad / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Animals in their Environment
 |
Frontier of the Lynx by Igor Metelskiy, Russia
Winner, Animals in their Environment
Igor Metelskiy shows a lynx stretching in the early evening sunshine, its body mirroring the undulating wilderness. The remote location and changing weather conditions made access to this spot – and transporting equipment there – a challenge. Igor positioned his camera trap near the footprints of potential prey. It took more than six months of waiting to achieve this relaxed image of the elusive lynx. A survey carried out in 2013 estimated the entire Russian lynx population was around 22,500 individuals, with numbers for the Russian Far East, including those in Primorsky Krai, at 5,890.
Location: Lazovsky District, Primorsky Krai, Russia
Technical details: Sony α7 IV + 24–70mm F2.8 lens; 1/500 at F5.6; ISO 100; Scout camera controller + PIR motion sensor
Copyright Igor Metelskiy / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Impact Award
 |
Recording by Hand by Liwia Pawłowska, Poland
Winner, Impact Award
Liwia Pawłowska watches as a relaxed common whitethroat is gently held by a bird ringer. Liwia is fascinated by bird ringing and has been photographing ringing sessions since she was nine. She says that she hopes her photograph ‘helps others to get to know this topic better.’ Volunteers can assist trained staff at bird-ringing sessions, where a bird’s length, sex, condition and age are recorded. Data collected helps scientists to monitor populations and track migratory patterns, aiding conservation efforts.
Location: Rgielsko, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland
Technical details: Nikon Coolpix P900; 1/400 at F5; ISO 100
Copyright Liwia Pawlowska / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Impact Award
 |
Hope for the Ninu by Jannico Kelk, Australia
Winner, Impact Award
Jannico Kelk illuminates a ninu, with the wire grass and shrubs behind it providing a frame against the darkness. Jannico spent each morning walking the sand dunes of a conservation reserve, searching for footprints that this rabbit-sized marsupial may have left the night before. Finding tracks near a burrow, he set up his camera trap. The greater bilby has many Aboriginal names, including ninu. It was brought to near extinction through predation by introduced foxes and cats. Within fenced reserves where many predators have been eradicated, the bilby is thriving.
Location: Arid Recovery, Roxby Downs, South Australia, Australia
Technical details: Canon EOS 60D + 24mm F2.8 lens; 1/80 at F9; ISO 320; 3x Nikon SB-28 Speedlight flashes; Camtraptions PIR motion sensor
Copyright Jannico Kelk / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Behavior: Amphibians and Reptiles
 |
Wetland Wrestle by Karine Aigner, USA
Winner, Behavior: Amphibians and Reptiles
Karine Aigner recognizes the skin of a yellow anaconda as it coils itself around the snout of a yacaré caiman. The tour group Karine was leading had stopped to photograph some marsh deer when she noticed an odd shape floating in the water. Through binoculars, Karine quickly recognized the reptiles and watched as they struggled with each other. Caimans are generalist feeders and will eat snakes. As anacondas get larger, they will include reptiles in their diet. It’s hard to determine who is the aggressor here. On the snake’s back are two tabanids, blood-sucking horseflies that are known to target reptiles.
Location: Transpantaneira Highway, Mato Grosso, Brazil
Technical details: Sony α1 + 200–600mm F5.6–6.3 lens; 1/400 at F16; ISO 800
Copyright Karine Aigner / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Animal Portraits
 |
On Watch by John E Marriott, Canada
Winner, Animal Portraits
John E Marriott frames a lynx resting, with its fully grown young sheltering from the cold wind behind it. John had been tracking this family group for almost a week, wearing snowshoes and carrying light camera gear to make his way through snowy forests. When fresh tracks led him to the group, he kept his distance to make sure he didn’t disturb them. Lynx numbers usually reflect the natural population fluctuations of their main prey species, the snowshoe hare. With climate change reducing snow coverage, giving other predators more opportunities to hunt the hares, hare populations may decline, in turn affecting the lynx population.
Location: Yukon, Canada
Technical details: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + 100–400mm fF.5–5.6 lens at 400mm; 1/800 at F9; ISO 1250
Copyright John E Marriott / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Photojournalist Story Award
 |
Dolphins of the Forest by Thomas Peschak, Germany/South Africa
Winner, Photojournalist Story Award
‘Among the Trees’: The Amazon river dolphin is one of two freshwater dolphin species living in the Amazon and Orinoco basins. Only this species has evolved to explore the seasonally flooded forest habitat.
Portfolio Story: Thomas Peschak documents the relationship between endangered Amazon river dolphins, also known as botos or pink river dolphins, and the people with whom they share their watery home. The Amazon river dolphin’s relationship with humans is complex. Traditional Amazonian beliefs hold that the dolphins can take on human form, and they are both revered and feared. Others see them as thieves who steal fish from nets and should be killed. Thomas took these images in areas where local communities are creating opportunities for tourists to encounter the dolphins. This brings another set of problems: when they’re fed by humans, the dolphins become unhealthy, and younger individuals don’t learn to hunt for themselves.
Technical details: Nikon Z9 + 14–30mm F4 lens at 16mm; 1/320 at F6.3; ISO 1250
Location: Brazil and Colombia
Copyright Thomas Peschak/ Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Winner, Rising Star Portfolio Award
 |
The Serengeti of the Sea by Sage Ono, USA
Winner, Rising Star Portfolio Award
‘Rubies and Gold’: These tube-snout fish eggs will fade in color as the embryos develop. But for now, they sparkle like gems next to the kelp’s gold, glowing, gas-filled buoyancy aids. The green serrated edges of the kelp fronds complete the simple composition.
Portfolio Story: Sage Ono explores the abundant life around the giant kelp forests in Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Inspired by the stories told by his grandfather, a retired marine biologist, and by a photograph of a larval cusk eel, Sage acquired a compact underwater camera and decided to take up underwater photography. After university, he moved to the coast near the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary to pursue his interest. Here, it’s the submerged world of the bay’s forests of giant kelp – the biggest of all seaweeds – and the diversity of life they contain that have captured his imagination.
Technical details: Nikon D850 + 60mm F2.8 lens; 1/160 at F14; ISO 250; Nauticam NA-D850 housing; 2x Sea & Sea YS-D2J strobes
Location: California, USA
Copyright Sage Ono / Wildlife Photographer of the Year
-
Solar Energy3 years agoDLR testing the use of molten salt in a solar power plant in Portugal
-
world news11 months ago
Gulf, France aid Gaza, Russia evacuates citizens
-
Camera11 months agoDJI Air 3 vs. Mini 4 Pro: which compact drone is best?
-
Solar Energy11 months agoGlencore eyes options on battery recycling project
-
Camera3 years agoCharles ‘Chuck’ Geschke, co-founder of Adobe and inventor of the PDF, dies at 81
-
world news11 months ago
Strong majority of Americans support Israel-Hamas hostage deal
-
Camera11 months agoSony a9 III: what you need to know
-
TOP SCEINCE6 months agoCan animals count?
