Aerial photography has always offered a unique perspective, and recent technological advances have made this genre of photography more accessible than ever. But what are the implications for the wildlife we’re trying to capture?
In this article, I’d like to share my thoughts about wildlife photography from the air, namely, using a manned aircraft (helicopter or light plane) or a drone. Photographing animals from the air is a somewhat controversial subject, both in terms of how the images look and the moral implications.
“A photographer shouldn’t shoot wildlife from the air if doing so causes any serious distress or harm to the animals.”
Let’s address the second controversy first, since people tend to have strong feelings about it.
A photographer shouldn’t shoot wildlife from the air if doing so causes any serious distress or harm to the animals. This means, for example, that if a bear is hunting, disturbing it with a buzzing drone and ruining the chase – and potentially depriving it of its prey – is wrong and shouldn’t be done.
However, this does not mean that all aerial wildlife photography is wrong. Some animals simply aren’t bothered by aircraft at a distance, so if photography is done responsibly and the animal’s well-being is taken into account, there’s no problem with shooting it from the air.
 |
|
A family of walruses having a sleepover on a flat iceberg in Svalbard. These lazy blobs couldn’t care less about my drone hovering above them. To make sure of that, my guide was monitoring their responses at all times using binoculars. (Magdalenefjord, Svalbard) DJI Mavic 3 Classic | 24mm F2.8 | ISO 100 | 1/500 sec | F6.3 |
 |
|
Shooting from far away allowed me to show the shapes a flock of flamingos creates in flight. I was so far away that there’s no way they would have been disturbed. (Sandwich Harbor, Namibia) Canon EOS 5D Mark IV | Canon EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS II USM | ISO 400 | 1/1000 sec | F8 |
Now that we have this out of the way, let’s talk about the actual photography. Aerial wildlife photography is awesome. Aircraft can fly to places the photographer can’t reach by other means. It can offer a different perspective, for better or worse, and generally opens up the options, which is what we want, assuming we are interested in creating original, interesting art.
That’s the good part, but there is a bad part. Using an aircraft means that we almost surely cannot shoot the animal at eye level. This is detrimental in the sense that the photographer is very limited in the kind of connection they can create between the viewer and the subject.
“Wildlife photography is all about bringing the beauty of animals to life and immersing viewers in their habitats.”
Wildlife photography is all about bringing the beauty of animals to life and immersing viewers in their habitats. Shooting from the air limits how close you can get and the shooting angle, which is a very serious disadvantage.
The way to overcome this disadvantage is to create a connection to the wildlife by other means. Namely, use the aircraft to create an interesting composition that shows the animal in its natural habitat in a visually appealing way.
Take, for example, the image below. This is a good example of an animal-in-landscape type of shot, which means a landscape image with a wildlife element. Here, the compositional ‘punch’ comes from the shapes of the broken sea ice. The pair of walruses is just the cherry on top – the element that breaks the pattern and injects interest into the flat, somewhat repetitive landscape.
 |
|
A pair of walruses chilling on sea ice. While the wildlife is the main subject, the broader context of the animals in their habitat and the way I composed the landscape are what make this image work. To achieve this composition, I had to use a drone. (Yoldiabukta, Svalbard) DJI Mavic 3 Classic | 24mm F2.8 | ISO 100 | 1/240 sec | F6.3 |
I have a bit of a problem with top-down aerial photography, but there are instances where it just works.
Last summer, I shot lunge-feeding fin whales during my Greenland photo workshop, and the drone proved to be the perfect tool for this. Not only did it allow me to get a good view of the whale, free of reflections and close enough to show detail, but since the whales often swim turned to their sides, the drone allowed me to capture the full view of the animals’ bodies and behaviors.
 |
|
Fin whales lunge-feeding in Disko Bay, Greenland. The whales feed by driving krill to the surface, then taking huge gulps and filtering the tiny crustaceans with their baleen. (Disko Bay, Greenland) DJI Mavic 3 Classic | 24mm F2.8 | ISO 100 | 1/400 sec | F3.2 |
 |
|
Since the whale is on its side, this high angle was actually perfect to show all the desired detail. See the tiny krill? Am I the only one who thought of Shai Hulud (the sand worm from Dune)? (Disko Bay, Greenland DJI Mavic 3 Classic | 24mm F2.8 | ISO 100 | 1/400 sec | F4 |
The fact that the whales feed turned to the side is exactly why I could shoot top-down (more or less) and still get the interesting parts of my subjects to show in the images.
Erez Marom is a professional nature photographer, guide and traveller. You can follow Erez’s work on Instagram and Facebook, and subscribe to his mailing list for updates.
If you’d like to experience and shoot some of the world’s most fascinating landscapes and wildlife with Erez as your guide, take a look at his unique photography workshops in Zambia, China, Colombia, Vietnam, Madagascar and more.
Erez has recently published his first e-book, Solving the Puzzle, thoroughly explaining his views about composition in landscape photography and beyond.
Selected Articles by Erez Marom:
- Lava Frenzy: Shooting Fagradalsfjall Volcano
- Behind the Shot: Tambora Sandwich
- Parallelism in Landscape Photography
- Black Hole Sun: Shooting the Total Solar Eclipse in Argentina
- Winds of Change: Shooting Changing landscapes
- Demon of the Deep: Shooting Kawah Ijen Volcano
- Shooting Kīlauea Volcano, Part 1: How to Melt a Drone
- Whatever It Doesn’t Take